Bug#708301: marked as done (RFS: fortunes-mario/0.20-8)

2013-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Oct 2013 04:26:12 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: fortunes-mario/0.20-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #708301, regarding RFS: fortunes-mario/0.20-8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Unable to upload a fix for 724195 (RC, FTBFS)

2013-10-23 Thread Rogério Brito
Package: hfsprogs Version: 332.25-10 Followup-For: Bug #724195 Hi. I have just tried to upload a fix for this bug, but it seems that, with the transition from the DMUA flags, I lost the privileges of uploading this one. You can find an updated packaging in any of the following repositories:

Re: Is it OK to have compile warnings

2013-10-23 Thread Russ Allbery
Gert Wollny writes: >> To directly answer your question, since I think everyone so far has told >> you that you should fix it, this answer from S/O [1] >> > [...] >> [1] >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3614691/casting-to-void-doesnt-remove-warn-unused-result-error/3615000#3615000 > One sh

Re: Is it OK to have compile warnings

2013-10-23 Thread Patrick Baggett
Oh yeah, definitely fix it if at all possible ;) On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Gert Wollny wrote: > > To directly answer your question, since I think everyone so far has told > > you that you should fix it, this answer from S/O [1] > > > [...] > > [1] > > > http://stackoverflow.com/question

Re: Is it OK to have compile warnings

2013-10-23 Thread Gert Wollny
> To directly answer your question, since I think everyone so far has told > you that you should fix it, this answer from S/O [1] > [...] > [1] > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3614691/casting-to-void-doesnt-remove-warn-unused-result-error/3615000#3615000 One should note that the question on

Re: Is it OK to have compile warnings

2013-10-23 Thread Patrick Baggett
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Tong Sun wrote: > Hi, > > Is it OK to have compile warnings when building a package? If not, > > how can I fix the following: > > dial.c: In function 'main': > dial.c:273:8: warning: ignoring return value of 'write', declared with > attribute warn_unused_result [-

Re: dm-upload-allowed-is-obsolete

2013-10-23 Thread Tong Sun
> > I've already removed the "Dm-Upload-Allowed" entry from my > >*downloaded* .dsc file, but it still shows up in the *built* > >.dsc file.  What's the proper way to fix it? >  > Remove the DMUA entry from debian/control. Thanks Vincent. JFTR, this is what I tried before asking the question,  g

Re: Multiple pbuilders setting from pbuilder User's Manual doesn't seem to work

2013-10-23 Thread Tong Sun
> The FAQ section 8  from pbuilder User's Manual describes briefly a way to > setup and use multiple pbuilder setups...  >  > Here's some examples on running pbuilder or pdebuild: >  > DIST=gutsy sudo pbuilder create >  > DIST=sid sudo pbuilder create --mirror http://http.us.debian.org/debian It