Packaging an extension with gnome-shell version dependency

2013-10-29 Thread Joseph Herlant
Dear mentors, I've packaged an extension for gnome-shell, and I realized that the version I packaged is only compatible with gnome-shell 3.4, so it will only work with Debian testing and stable, but not unstable. The issue is that the version of the extension that is compatible with gnome-shell

Re: Packaging an extension with gnome-shell version dependency

2013-10-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote: I've packaged an extension for gnome-shell, and I realized that the version I packaged is only compatible with gnome-shell 3.4, so it will only work with Debian testing and stable, but not unstable. You will need to package a version that

Re: Packaging an extension with gnome-shell version dependency

2013-10-29 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi Paul, Thanks for the answer. So that means that I won't be able to have my package in testing before gnome 3.8 gets in testing? Thanks in advance, Joseph On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote: I've packaged

Re: Packaging an extension with gnome-shell version dependency

2013-10-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote: So that means that I won't be able to have my package in testing before gnome 3.8 gets in testing? Correct. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: Packaging an extension with gnome-shell version dependency

2013-10-29 Thread Joseph Herlant
Ok, thanks, I'll update my RFS and redo the package with the correct version. Sorry for the doubleton, I just did a reply all. Thanks again for the quick answer. Joseph On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote:

Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1

2013-10-29 Thread Joseph Herlant
Hi, It seems the version I packaged is ONLY compatible gnome-shell 3.4, so it won't work in unstable (see discussion on debian-mentors list). I tested the package in Debain testing and it worked fine, but I'll will redo the package for the unstable version (gnome-shell 3.8). In the mean time,

Bug#728181: RFS: tofrodos/1.7.13+ds-1 [ITA]

2013-10-29 Thread Markus Koschany
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package tofrodos which I intend to adopt. Package name: tofrodos Version : 1.7.13+ds-1 Upstream Author : Christopher Heng URL :

Bug#728181: RFS: tofrodos/1.7.13+ds-1 [ITA]

2013-10-29 Thread Markus Koschany
On 29.10.2013 10:23, Andrew Shadura wrote: Hello, On 29 October 2013 09:57, Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package tofrodos which I intend to adopt. I've built, signed and uploaded your package. Thanks for your work. Feel free to contact me if

Bug#728181: RFS: tofrodos/1.7.13+ds-1 [ITA]

2013-10-29 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, On 29 October 2013 09:57, Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package tofrodos which I intend to adopt. I've built, signed and uploaded your package. Thanks for your work. Feel free to contact me if you need to sponsor your upload again. -- WBR,

upload of xchroot-2.3.2-1 vanishes

2013-10-29 Thread Elmar Stellnberger
Dear Debian Mentors, Having filed an ITP bug for xchroot as required (721447) and uploaded xchroot-2.3.2-1 with the correct key to mentors.debian.net by dput more than a day ago the package still has not appeared in my personal folder at https://mentors.debian.net/packages/my. Even before ~

Re: upload of xchroot-2.3.2-1 vanishes

2013-10-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Elmar Stellnberger wrote: Having filed an ITP bug for xchroot as required (721447) and uploaded xchroot-2.3.2-1 with the correct key to mentors.debian.net by dput more than a day ago the package still has not appeared in my personal folder at

Bug#728220: RFS: fatcat -- FAT32 explore, extract, repair, and forensic tool

2013-10-29 Thread Grégoire Passault
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hello, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package: * Package name: fatcat Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : Grégoire Passault g.passa...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/Gregwar/fatcat/ * License : MIT

Bug#728181: marked as done (RFS: tofrodos/1.7.13+ds-1 [ITA])

2013-10-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 29 Oct 2013 16:26:17 + with message-id e1vbc7v-0001gd...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: tofrodos/1.7.13+ds-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #728181, regarding RFS: tofrodos/1.7.13+ds-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Re: Bug#728220: RFS: fatcat -- FAT32 explore, extract, repair, and forensic tool

2013-10-29 Thread Michael Shuler
Hi again, Some other things I noticed: - no source code Copyright in d/copyright (only lists debian/*) - is the source code to build the docs/ image files available? - no d/watch file - no Homepage: entry in d/control - no Vcs-*: entries in d/control -- Kind regards, Michael -- To