Your message dated Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:28:16 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: ruby-rkerberos/0.1.2-2 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #718206,
regarding RFS: ruby-rkerberos/0.1.2-2 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:20:50 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>In the particular case, not much. libunwind is somewhat a special case...
Thanks a lot for your detailed explanation Niels!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
❦ 22 décembre 2013 12:10 CET, Thomas Leonard :
>> "ITP stands for Intend to package. These are packages which not exist in
>> Debian yet. Such packages need to go through NEW. That is the queue on
>> ftp-master for packages uploaded for the first time, which need to be
>> reviewed first. This in
On 2013-11-23 15:46, Thomas Leonard wrote:
On 2013-11-16 22:26, Eriberto wrote:
A doubt: where is the ITP bug???
Thanks!
Regards,
I'm not sure what you mean. Do I need to file a bug somewhere as well?
According to http://mentors.debian.net/sponsor/rfs-howto:
"ITP stands for Intend to packa
On 2013-12-22 03:45, T o n g wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to adopt the par2cmdline package, but on its QA page,
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/par2cmdline.html
> it says,
>
> ,-
> | "This package is part of the ongoing testing transition known as
> | auto-libunwind. Please avoid uploads unre
5 matches
Mail list logo