The package should be in good shape and should only need some minor updates.
More recent upstream version is also available.
If you are interested in sponsoring this package, I can do the work during
the next few days.
If you want to co-maintain the package, feel free to do the work yourself,
On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 21:00:18 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
There have been several replies to this, but none of them quite tell you
exactly what to do, so let me take a stab at that.
First, dh_installdirs is not actually useful for solving this particular
problem . . .
Thank you, thank you,
Hi,
I am doing test build of my binary package, and I get the following
warnings.
W: zh-autoconvert: empty-binary-package
I checked and it *is* empty, only containing copyright and changelog,
nothing else. I don't know why because it looks like the installation was
fine.
I've post the
T o n g mlist4sunt...@yahoo.com writes:
I am doing test build of my binary package, and I get the following
warnings.
W: zh-autoconvert: empty-binary-package
I checked and it *is* empty, only containing copyright and changelog,
nothing else. I don't know why because it looks like the
On 02-01-14 20:44, Russ Allbery wrote:
Be aware of one gotcha: the destination column in *.install files
specifies the destination *directory*, not file name. You cannot use
dh_install to rename files;
Except if you build depend on dh-exec and use it (The man page is good,
so I am not going
On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 11:44:28 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
You're building multiple binary packages from the same source package.
This means that the Debian package build infrastructure has no inherent
way of determining which files go into which package. You have to tell
it explicitly.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am packing The Best Ad Blocking Method[1] into a Debian package and am
looking for a sponsor for my package dbab, which starts with
reviewing it first.
[1] http://sfxpt.wordpress.com/2011/02/21/the-best-ad-blocking-method/
*
Hi,
Could you please help me sponsoring this upload. Because bug 728027 a
reverse dependency has been also removed from testing (osmo).
Thanks
pgpQhYvBKJSuz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
If I take a simple file (BSD-licensed), (greatly) improved it, and
include it in my package. How should I handle the situation?
- I should claim that the author of the new file is me, right?
- I should inherit the BSD-licensed, right?
- How to express that the new file was based on
T o n g mlist4sunt...@yahoo.com writes:
If I take a simple file (BSD-licensed), (greatly) improved it, and
include it in my package. How should I handle the situation?
- I should claim that the author of the new file is me, right?
Usually I list both authors, such as:
* Written by Larry
This has all sorts of problems.
1) incomplete source and debian packaging (symlinked to nowhere)
2) native package (version 1.0.1 and debian/ dir should be separate from
upstream source)
--
Kind regards,
Michael
mshuler@mana:~/tmp/build$ dget -xu
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
As part of the upcoming SpatiaLite transition am I looking for a sponsor for
my package pyspatialite.
Please refer to the thread on debian-gis@ for more information on this
transition:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
As part of the upcoming SpatiaLite transition am I looking for a sponsor for
my package librasterlite.
Please refer to the thread on debian-gis@ for more information on this
transition:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
As part of the upcoming SpatiaLite transition am I looking for a sponsor for
my package spatialite-tools.
Please refer to the thread on debian-gis@ for more information on this
transition:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
As part of the upcoming SpatiaLite transition am I looking for a sponsor for
my package spatialite-gui.
Please refer to the thread on debian-gis@ for more information on this
transition:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mapserver
Package name: mapserver
Version : 6.4.1-1
Upstream Author : The MapServer team
URL : http://www.mapserver.org
License : MIT/X11
Section
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-nagiosplugin:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nagiosplugin/nagiosplugin_1.2-1.dsc
It builds these binary packages:
python-nagiosplugin - Python class
Your message dated Fri, 03 Jan 2014 04:26:20 +
with message-id e1vywky-0001md...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: mwlib.ext/0.13.2-1 [ITP] -- external dependencies
needed by the mwlib library
has caused the Debian Bug report #719884,
regarding RFS: mwlib.ext/0.13.2-1 [ITP] --
18 matches
Mail list logo
