On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 07:39:05AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> It is clear for me. Maybe if you tell me how it is not clear for you I can fix
> it accordingly. I especially like how the README even includes steps to use
> fdisk to figure out the partition offsets.
---end quoted text---
At t
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 07:39:05AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi Ahmed,
>
> Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 06:51:13)
> > * I had to modify the hardening patch to get fuseloop to build, modified
> > patch is attached.
>
> I think you forgot to attach your patch but notice that after i
Hi Ahmed,
Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 06:51:13)
> * I had to modify the hardening patch to get fuseloop to build, modified
> patch is attached.
I think you forgot to attach your patch but notice that after informing
upstream of the issue, they fixed it for fuseloop 1.0.2 which is packag
Hello,
* I had to modify the hardening patch to get fuseloop to build, modified
patch is attached.
* I think it would be useful to install upstream's README.md (just add
it in debian/fuseloop.docs)
* The README isn't clear about how to actually mount the exposed
partition
--
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2014 04:26:25 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: worklog/1.8-7 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #723626,
regarding RFS: worklog/1.8-7 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
This version removes the jar files from the package.
I've also fixed debian packaging so that egg-info and C source files are
not included in the final binary.
BR
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:02:02 +0100
with message-id
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #735685,
regarding RFS: libnftables/0.0.0~20131209-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libnftnl"
* Package name: libnftnl
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : Pablo Neira Ayuso
* URL : http://www.netfilter.org
* License : GPL-2+
Section
On 21/01/14 18:45, Andreas Tille wrote:
> However, it is kicked because of an "old libffi" dependency. I realised
> that it had in fact
>
>libffi6 (>= 3.0.4)
>
> in its dependencies which was included via
>
>${shlibs:Depends} or
>${misc:Depends}
>
> but I have no idea, how to prev
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mandos"
* Package name: mandos
Version : 1.6.3-1
Upstream Author : Mandos Maintainers
* URL : http://www.recompile.se/mandos
* License : GPL-3+
Section
Your message dated Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:09:48 +0100
with message-id <87r481jb37@deep-thought.43-1.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#734125: RFS: deal.ii/8.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Finite Element
Differential Equations Analysis Library
has caused the Debian Bug report #734125,
regarding RFS: deal.ii/8.1.0-1 [
Hi Julien,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 09:39:03PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >
> >libffi6 (>= 3.0.4)
> >
> No, the version that got removed from testing depended on libffi5, which
> we got rid of.
Ahh, thanks for the clarification. I was actually chacking the qiime
version in unstable whic
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 19:45:40 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope this is the correct list to ask this questions - if not please
> redirect me (and also please CC me in your reply). [debian-mentors in
> CC as well - may be some other people have a similar problem.]
>
> I know that qi
I'm working yet.
Thanks
Em 21-01-2014 08:39, Mònica Ramírez Arceda escreveu:
According to [0], arnu has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 733022 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
On 21/01/14 20:10, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2014-01-21 19:45, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> I know that qiime has a serious bug (#731190) where I was seeking for
>> help six weeks ago with no real result. So I would have expected to
>> become kicked from testing because of this bug which would be fine.
On 2014-01-21 19:45, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi Andreas and d-mentors,
> I hope this is the correct list to ask this questions - if not please
> redirect me (and also please CC me in your reply). [debian-mentors in
> CC as well - may be some other people have a similar problem.]
>
Seems l
Hi,
I hope this is the correct list to ask this questions - if not please
redirect me (and also please CC me in your reply). [debian-mentors in
CC as well - may be some other people have a similar problem.]
I know that qiime has a serious bug (#731190) where I was seeking for
help six weeks ago w
Florian Rothmaier writes:
> Currently, my "debian/control" has the following structure:
>
> While looking at other postgres extensions (e.g. "ip4r", "postgis",
> "prefix"), I noted that in all cases, the extension is built for one
> specific postgres version only, e.g.
Have a look at the debian/r
Re: Florian Rothmaier 2014-01-21 <52de8102.8040...@ari.uni-heidelberg.de>
> Currently, my "debian/control" has the following structure:
>
> Source: q3c
> ...
>
> Package: postgresql-8.4-q3c
> ...
>
> Package: postgresql-9.0-q3c
> ...
>
> Package: postgresql-9.1-q3c
> ...
>
>
> While looking a
Hi Christoph, hi Dimitri, (cc: dear mentors)
finally, after quite a long break, I've taken up my work on the postgres
extensions "pgsphere" and "q3c". Christoph might remember this because
he reviewed these packages about one year ago (thanks again for that!).
Since both packages have similar iss
According to [0], arnu has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 733022 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
According to [0], deal.ii has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 734125
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
22 matches
Mail list logo
