Another possibility: Use qemu to simulate the target arch... Needs usually a
good portion of patience, but helped me a couple times already.
Paul Wise schrieb:
>On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:59 AM, L.C. Karssen wrote:
>
>> What I can't see is their exact error messages. This is because
>automake
>>
Hi Tong,
You should always have an updated development system.
It can also be a chroot, so it won't interfere with your daily needed
installation. ( Indeed, a chroot for dev work has other advantages too; IMHO
strongly suggested to use it always..)
--
coldtobi
Tong Sun schrieb:
>Hi Eribert
Your message dated Thu, 23 Jan 2014 04:26:11 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: rateit/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Tool for performing MUSHRA
tests
has caused the Debian Bug report #721812,
regarding RFS: rateit/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Tool for performing MUSHRA tests
to be marked as done.
This means
Hi Eriberto,
Thanks a lot for checking into my package.
My sid is about 3~4 weeks old but somehow I don't have lintian
problems of hyphen-used-as-minus-sign and
hardening-no-fortify-functions. I've shot into the dark, so please
verify for me. New build just uploaded:
Uploading to mentors (via ht
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2014 17:19:21 -0800
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#736283: sponsorship-request: RFS: lcas/1.3.19-2 -- Fix
for FTBFS bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #736283,
regarding sponsorship-request: RFS: lcas/1.3.19-2 -- Fix for FTBFS bug
to be marked as done.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Johann Felix Soden wrote:
> I plan also to look at your RFS for hwinfo, but it seems that
> you already have people who can sponsor it...
That was my line of thinking for libx86emu as well, heh. :)
Feel free to review and sponsor hwinfo at the same time as libx8
Hi Sebastien,
the libx86emu-package looks quite ready now - good job!
I found only one thing which should be fixed:
- The description of the libx86emu-dev specifies that it
contains a "static library", which is not the case
and is not necessary for a -dev package.
The solution is simple:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:59 AM, L.C. Karssen wrote:
> What I can't see is their exact error messages. This is because automake
> by default runs tests in parallel and sends the output of the individual
> tests to a file called test-suite.log. Is there a way to get access to
> that file on the bui
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-aosd"
* Package name: python-aosd
Version : 0.2.3-1
Upstream Author : Armin Häberling
* URL : https://code.google.com/p/python-aosd/
* License
Control: reassign -1 sponsorship-requests
On Ma, 21 ian 14, 23:02:02, Dennis van Dok wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-request
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lcas"
>
> * Package name: lcas
>Version : 1.3.19-2
>Upstream
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for release 0.8.2-1 of “comixcursors”.
* Package name: comixcursors
Version : 0.8.2
Upstream Author : Jens Luetkens
* URL :
http://opendesktop.org/content/show.php/ComixCurso
On 2014-01-22 00:43, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 21/01/14 18:45, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> However, it is kicked because of an "old libffi" dependency. I realised
>> that it had in fact
>>
>>libffi6 (>= 3.0.4)
>>
>> in its dependencies which was included via
>>
>>${shlibs:Depends} or
>>
Hi,
The point is probably more that the package description is relatively useless,
and should rather explain that it's a test runner; what about e.g. "PlainBox
based test runner"?
Eric
Sylvain Pineau wrote:
>On 22/01/2014 18:15, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> On 2014-01-22, Sylvain Pineau wrote:
>>>
Dear list,
With the help of the Debian-med team I have created the probabel package
for Debian [1]. After uploading I noticed in the buildd logs that the
package fails to build on several architectures (e.g. mips and powerpc).
Looking at the build log [2] I see that the package compiles, but that
On 22/01/2014 18:15, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2014-01-22, Sylvain Pineau wrote:
It builds those binary packages:
checkbox-ng - Simple replacement for CheckBox
What's CheckBox?
/Sune
CheckBox is a test runner for Ubuntu
(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Automation/Checkbox)
CheckBox NG i
On 2014-01-22, Sylvain Pineau wrote:
> It builds those binary packages:
>
> checkbox-ng - Simple replacement for CheckBox
What's CheckBox?
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "checkbox-ng"
* Package name: checkbox-ng
Version : 0.1-1
Upstream Author : Sylvain Pineau
* URL : http://launchpad.net/checkbox
* License : GPLv3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/22/2014 05:12 AM, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 10:36:11)
>
>> Actually what happens implicitly (at least on Ubuntu precise) is:
>> $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $^ -o $@
>>
>> which causes the compilation
Hi,
Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 10:36:11)
> Actually what happens implicitly (at least on Ubuntu precise) is: $(CC)
> $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $^ -o $@
>
> which causes the compilation to fail, because the -l<...> should be
> after the object files (or source files in this case).
Ah f
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:22:12AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi Ahmed,
>
> Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 08:51:02)
> > Sorry, that I forgot to attach it. Please find it attached in this email.
>
> thanks! What problem does that patch fix?
>
> The only differences in comparison to my
Hi Ahmed,
Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 08:51:02)
> Sorry, that I forgot to attach it. Please find it attached in this email.
thanks! What problem does that patch fix?
The only differences in comparison to my patch that I can make out are:
1) you add -lpthread but `pkg-config --libs fuse
Roberto Luiz Debarba writes:
> I'm working yet.
An ITP (Intent to Package) bug should be done before you start working,
to try to avoid that anyone else starts to work on the same package. So,
if you're working on this package, an ITP bug should exist.
Cheers.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
22 matches
Mail list logo
