El Sat, 25 de Jan 2014 a las 9:42 PM, Vincent Cheng
escribió:
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi Cameron,
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Cameron Norman
wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "geary"
* Package name : ge
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi Cameron,
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Cameron Norman
wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "geary"
>
> * Package name : geary
> Version : 0.4.3-1.1
> Upstream Author : Yorba
>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "geary"
* Package name : geary
Version : 0.4.3-1.1
Upstream Author : Yorba
* URL : http://yorba.org/projects/geary
* License : LGPL 2.1+
Section : mail
It builds those binary packages:
g
On 26. jan. 2014 02:02, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
>
>> This is my first package. Should I follow some special procedure? or
>> just rename the files and re-upload?
>
> Since probably no-one has the old package name installed, just rename
> eve
On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 02:37 +0100, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
> I would have to fork the project, declare the SVGs the source, and then
> convert them back to OpenType? That sounds like a lot of work. :-/
I definitely would not suggest forking the project but taking over
maintenance of the exist
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
> This is my first package. Should I follow some special procedure? or
> just rename the files and re-upload?
Since probably no-one has the old package name installed, just rename
everything, retitle the bug and re-upload.
> I have alr
On 26. jan. 2014 00:57, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 5:27 AM, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
>
>> * Package name: otf-clear-sans
>
> Please rename your source/binary packages in accordance with current
> practices. This would mean changing it to fonts-clear-sans.
I could swear tha
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libgeo-proj4-perl"
Package name: libgeo-proj4-perl
Version : 1.05-1
Upstream Author : Mark Overmeer
URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Geo-Proj4
License :
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Sebastien Badia wrote:
> * URL : http://www.ripe.net/tools/
According to the upstream FTP site, asused has been 'decommissioned'.
I wonder if the package should be replaced in Debian by whatever
replaces it upstream?
ftp://ftp.ripe.net/tools/OLD/
--
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 5:27 AM, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote:
> * Package name: otf-clear-sans
Please rename your source/binary packages in accordance with current
practices. This would mean changing it to fonts-clear-sans.
> * URL : https://01.org/clear-sans
Upstream appears to
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hh"
* Package name: hh
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Martin Dvorak (Dvorka)
* URL : https://github.com/dvorka/hstr
* License : Apache 2
Sec
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "asused"
* Package name: asused
Version : 3.72-11
* URL : http://www.ripe.net/tools/
* License : MIT
Section : utils
It builds those binary packages
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my very first package "otf-clear-sans".
* Package name: otf-clear-sans
Version : 1.0-3
Upstream Author : Darren Wilson (Intel)
* URL : https://01.org/clear-sans
* License
Re: Florian Rothmaier 2014-01-24 <52e2acbf.1090...@ari.uni-heidelberg.de>
> It should be mentioned that my "debian/rules" is still based on an
> outdated version of "pg_buildext" from
> "postgresql-server-dev-all" (129). So the next step will be to use v152
> of this script which includes the "loop
I can't promise I'll sponsor this package, but here's a preliminary
review:
* Mateusz Łukasik , 2014-01-25, 20:46:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/napi-bash/napi-bash_0.31.1-1.dsc
Instead of using debian/dirs, I'd rather fix the upstream makefile, so
that it doesn't explode when
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "napi-bash"
* Package name: napi-bash
Version : 0.31.1-1
Upstream Author : 3ED
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/napi-bash/
* License :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/25/2014 05:24 AM, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting The Wanderer (2014-01-22 15:14:34)
>
>> Do things still work fine in Debian when using ld.gold (by
>> installing the binutils-gold package) rather than ld.bfd? I know
>> there's an
Hi Ahmed,
Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 08:52:43)
> At the end of the README it says to use mountlo, but there isn't such a
> utility in Debian.
there is also no such utility in other distributions it seems. After some
digging I found out that mountlo is a utility which uses fuse and a minima
Hi,
Quoting The Wanderer (2014-01-22 15:14:34)
> Do things still work fine in Debian when using ld.gold (by installing the
> binutils-gold package) rather than ld.bfd? I know there's an important
> difference in ld.gold related to --as-needed (or possibly to -
> --no-as-needed, I don't recall offh
19 matches
Mail list logo
