Your message dated Mon, 17 Feb 2014 04:25:15 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: mrrescue/1.02b-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #719985,
regarding RFS: mrrescue/1.02b-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Mon, 17 Feb 2014 04:25:15 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: wiktionarytodict/20130929 [ITP] -- dictionaries
for dictd
has caused the Debian Bug report #724896,
regarding RFS: wiktionarytodict/20130929 [ITP] -- dictionaries for dictd
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Mon, 17 Feb 2014 04:25:10 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: psocksxx/0.0.2-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #724539,
regarding RFS: psocksxx/0.0.2-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Felix Natter wrote:
> the freeplane package's .orig.tar.gz contains some windows/mac stuff like
> *.ico, stuff for windows/mac installer etc.:
Without having looked at how these were created and if DFSG item 2 is
satisfied...
> ./freeplane_framework/windows-icons
BTW, it might be appropriate to forward your patches upstream too since
having them online is also a privacy violation because browsers load
JavaScript and images by default.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 15:19 +0400, Sergey Kirpichev wrote:
> I hope, that's fixed in:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/awstats.git;a=commit;h=9c8f27ceb7f9490387a32b9fb2f45b21f69f853d
It doesn't have any privacy issues, but:
It is utterly pointless to include a 1x1 tracking gif
Hi,
I am trying to work on an orphaned package maradns. It uses quite a
lot of patches managed with quilt. I created a repo on alioth [1] to
manage different versions. I imported all the versions (debsnap and
git-import-dscs). Now I am stuck with two problems:
1. Should I keep the source unpatche
New upload; changelog attached.
Upstream has replied to the above question regarding signed releases;
they will start signing with the next release, 2.9.7, which should be
within a few months according to the principal developer.
changelog
Description: Binary data
PS:
It also does not build in an pdebuilder environment.
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking libconfig.h usability... no
checking libconfig.h presence... no
checking for libconfig.h... no
configure: error: oops no libconfig.h ?
==> config.log <==
This file contains any messages produced by com
Hallo Jonathan,
(first the usual disclaimer: I'm not a DD so I cannot sponsor.)
I only briefly look into the packaage , so this is only a brief review
mostly from the data available from m.d.n... Sorry, also on a hurry ..
I see those problems which should work on:
-> you need to file an ITP Bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "oh-my-zsh"
* Package name: oh-my-zsh
Version : 0~20140211-1
Upstream Author : Robby Russell and contributors
* URL
Hi Eriberto,
On 16/02/2014 13:24, Eriberto wrote:
> I checked your package. Note that I want help you improve your package
> but I can upload it.
And that's much appreciated.
My considerations:
>
> d/changelog: the initial realease is your first work in the package.
> So, d/changelog must have
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ngp"
* Package name: ngp
Version : 0.1-1.0
Upstream Author : Jonathan Klee
* URL : https://github.com/jonathanklee/*ngp*
* License : GPL
Section
Your message dated Sun, 16 Feb 2014 14:15:23 +0100
with message-id <20140216131523.gm26...@jadzia.comodo.priv.at>
and subject line Re: libsocket6-perl
has caused the Debian Bug report #739003,
regarding RFS: libsocket6-perl/0.25-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Hi Fabien,
I checked your package. Note that I want help you improve your package
but I can upload it. My considerations:
d/changelog: the initial realease is your first work in the package.
So, d/changelog must have only 'Initial release (Closes: #731278)'.
d/copyright: I suggest you put all li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/02/14 23:38, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 22:33:15 +, Daniel Lintott wrote:
>
>>> replace "dh $@" with "dh $@ --buildsystem=perl_makemaker" then
>>> dh will use Makefile.PL etc. and everything looks good
>
>> The only snag i
Hi Felix,
No need to remove if:
- the individual files haven't a proprietary license.
- the files are source code.
- the compiled files have a source code in the tarball.
Regards,
Eriberto
2014-02-16 7:33 GMT-03:00 Felix Natter :
> the freeplane package's .orig.tar.gz contains some windows/ma
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> I'll ask for the lintian text to be clarified but there is no reason
> not to do the changes properly now, before the clarification
> is added to lintian.
I hope, that's fixed in:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/awstats.git;a=com
hello,
the freeplane package's .orig.tar.gz contains some windows/mac stuff like
*.ico, stuff for windows/mac installer etc.:
$ find . -regex ".*\(win\|mac\).*" | grep -v "java$"
./freeplane_framework/windows-installer
./freeplane_framework/windows-installer/WizModernImage-IS.bmp
./freeplane_fra
19 matches
Mail list logo