Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-02-28 Thread Mikhail Morfikov
I'm new to building packages by using pbuilder tool, and I have to build a package multiple times before it builds successfully, or in the way I prefer. The most annoying part ot this is installation of dependencies -- each time I build a package, it has to install the same dependencies over and

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-02-28 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Mikhail Morfikov mmorfi...@gmail.com wrote: I'm new to building packages by using pbuilder tool, and I have to build a package multiple times before it builds successfully, or in the way I prefer. The most annoying part ot this is installation of dependencies

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-02-28 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Feb 28, 2014 10:52 AM, Mikhail Morfikov mmorfi...@gmail.com wrote: I'm new to building packages by using pbuilder tool, and I have to build a package multiple times before it builds successfully, or in the way I prefer. The most annoying part ot this is installation of dependencies -- each

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-02-28 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:11 AM, Mattia Rizzolo mapr...@ubuntu.com wrote: On Feb 28, 2014 10:52 AM, Mikhail Morfikov mmorfi...@gmail.com wrote: I'm new to building packages by using pbuilder tool, and I have to build a package multiple times before it builds successfully, or in the way I

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-02-28 Thread Bartosz Feński
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 W dniu 28.02.2014 10:52, Mikhail Morfikov pisze: I'm new to building packages by using pbuilder tool, and I have to build a package multiple times before it builds successfully, or in the way I prefer. The most annoying part ot this is

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-02-28 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Feb 28, 2014 11:17 AM, Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org wrote: Hmmm, out of curiousity, how is this different from pbuilder-dist (in ubuntu-dev-tools)? The concept is the same, but it is quite different: * integrate support for ccache and apt caching for separate dists (every dists uses a

Bug#740344: RFS: mapserver/6.4.1-2

2014-02-28 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mapserver Package name: mapserver Version : 6.4.1-2 Upstream Author : The MapServer team URL : http://www.mapserver.org/ License : MIT Section :

Bug#740283: marked as done (RFS: qgis/2.2.0-0~exp1)

2014-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:28:13 + with message-id e1wjqih-0001mu...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: qgis/2.2.0-0~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #740283, regarding RFS: qgis/2.2.0-0~exp1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-02-28 Thread Mikhail Morfikov
You're right. The better way is to use cowbuilder instead of pbuilder. The first is a wrapper around the latter. Thanks for the hint. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-02-28 Thread Mikhail Morfikov
You shouldn't try to preserve the environment, every time you build stuff you should have a clean installation. I know, but when I work with the same package, I think there's no point in installing the same dependencies over and over. I could save the chroot, and when I finish playing with the

Bug#740376: RFS: mapcache/1.2.1-2

2014-02-28 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mapcache Package name: mapcache Version : 1.2.1-2 Upstream Author : Thomas Bonfort and the MapServer team. URL : http://www.mapserver.org/mapcache/ License

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-02-28 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Feb 28, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Mikhail Morfikov wrote: I'm new to building packages by using pbuilder tool, and I have to build a package multiple times before it builds successfully, or in the way I prefer. This is one of the reasons why I prefer to use sbuild for most of my local builds. You

Bug#740390: RFS: tinyows/1.1.0-4 [ITP]

2014-02-28 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package tinyows Package name: tinyows Version : 1.1.0-4 Upstream Author : Barbara

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-02-28 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote: On Feb 28, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Mikhail Morfikov wrote: I'm new to building packages by using pbuilder tool, and I have to build a package multiple times before it builds successfully, or in the way I prefer. This is one of

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-02-28 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote: This is one of the reasons why I prefer to use sbuild for most of my local builds. You can tell it to preserve the chroot when the build fails, and it's easy to go in, inspect the build environment, and tweak your package

Re: RFS: cl-launch (updated package)

2014-02-28 Thread Faré
Dear Debian Mentors and Debian Lispers, you did well to procrastinate on my cl-launch 4.0.0-1, for after a round of bug fixes, here is 4.0.1-1. Thus, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.0.1-1 of my package cl-launch. It builds these binary packages: cl-launch - uniform frontend to

Re: Is there a way to preserve pbuilder chroot environment?

2014-02-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: At this time there is no so much differences between sbuild and pbuilder. If you can convince the pbuilder and sbuild maintainers to work together to merge all the missing parts of pbuilder/cowbuilder/qemubuilder into sbuild, I will buy you

Bug#740376: marked as done (RFS: mapcache/1.2.1-2)

2014-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 01 Mar 2014 04:27:26 + with message-id e1wjbwi-0003xt...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: mapcache/1.2.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #740376, regarding RFS: mapcache/1.2.1-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#740344: marked as done (RFS: mapserver/6.4.1-2)

2014-02-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 01 Mar 2014 04:27:26 + with message-id e1wjbwi-0003xy...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: mapserver/6.4.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #740344, regarding RFS: mapserver/6.4.1-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has