Hi Stephen,
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 07:41:29PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
For sure make is not in @builddeps@ since it is build-essential ... which is
actually my point.
See the documentation:
`@builddeps@' will be replaced by the package's Build-Depends:,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 01:41:09PM +0200, Nico Schlömer wrote:
Everything that is interesting in the current netcdf-bin is included
in the C-library of netCDF. The only binaries included in the C++ and
Fortran builds are configuration assistants that are losing their
significance in the new
* Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu, 2014-04-03, 08:54:
@builddeps@ does include make.
Please explain is that in the python-pysam example this is actually NOT
the case since
[...]
-Depends: @, python-pysam-tests, samtools
+Depends: @, python-pysam-tests, samtools, make
Restrictions:
Hi,
I tried to migrate bamtools (not yet released package!) at
git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/bamtools.git
to d-shlibs but it ended up by
d-shlibmove --commit \
--multiarch \
--devunversioned \
--exclude-la \
On 2014-04-03, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
Hi,
I tried to migrate bamtools (not yet released package!) at
git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/bamtools.git
to d-shlibs but it ended up by
What's d-shlibs and why do you use it?
Isn't it just much easier to use a install file
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 12:21:18PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2014-04-03, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
Hi,
I tried to migrate bamtools (not yet released package!) at
git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/bamtools.git
to d-shlibs but it ended up by
What's d-shlibs
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 01:40:04PM +0200, r...@ringlet.net wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 06:03:16PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gforth. This upload updates
the package to a
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:03:02PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
Isn't it just much easier to use a install file pointing the right
places?
No. You need to adapt to different versions
Huh?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package spatialite.
Package name: spatialite
Version : 4.1.1-7
Upstream Author : Alessandro Furieri a.furi...@lqt.it
URL : https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/libspatialite/
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libgdal-grass
Package name: libgdal-grass
Version : 1.10.1-2
Upstream Author : Frank Warmerdam warmer...@pobox.com,
Radim Blazek radim.bla...@gmail.com
URL
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
User: debian-de...@debian.or.jp
Usertags: debianjp
Control: block 743022 by -1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-social-auth
* Package name: python-social-auth
Version : 0.1.23-1
Upstream Author
I have always been a bit vague about the workings of symbols files in
packaging. I understand what it's supposed to do, but not how the
mechanics work.
I have a problem getting mozjs to build on arm64 which means someone
needs to explain to me exactly what the contents of those files mean.
The
Your message dated Fri, 04 Apr 2014 04:27:11 +
with message-id e1wvvih-by...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: spatialite/4.1.1-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #743578,
regarding RFS: spatialite/4.1.1-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
13 matches
Mail list logo
