On 04/20/2014 08:38 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 7:06 AM, RJ Clay j...@rocasa.us wrote:
Dear mentors,
As my usual sponsor for my ledgersmb package does not appear to be
available, I am again and still looking for a sponsor for version 1.3.39-1
of my ledgersmb package.
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 04/20/2014 08:38 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote:
- debian/copyright: the license for tools/prepare-company-database.*
(line 33) should be given a name, not just left blank. The license
block looks pretty much the same to me as a typical 2-clause BSD
license.
Taken
Hi Vincent,
It's often the case that someone who packages something for debian
isn't directly involved upstream or is a member of upstream's
organization, so although he/she may choose the same license as
upstream for debian/*, the copyright line would be entirely different.
Indeed, the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-as...@lists.debian.org,
debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package eso-midas
* Package name: eso-midas
Version : 13.09pl1.2-1
Hi,
If the package foo depends on the package libbar-dev and
libbar-dev is in new queue waiting for approval, can I upload the
package foo build on the sid chroot with the package libbar-dev
manually installed to it?
Or I should wait the package libbar-dev to be moved to sid?
Regards,
Osamu
Hi,
I really appriciate your offer.
Since I have not recieved any other offers yet,
I'd like you to become my sponsor.
Also, thanks for checking my package.
(Auch! There are a lot of problems.)
Unfortunately, I don't have much time to spend on my package right now.
Could you wait few more days?
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On 04/20/2014 04:49 AM, Vincent Cheng wrote:
- debian/copyright: your LGPL-2.1 license block should contain the
standard LGPL header (similar to that of your GPL-2 license block just
below it in your copyright file)
Fixed.
- debian/control: Vcs-{Git,Browser}
On 04/20/2014 08:05 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote:
Just curious, what sort of issues are you having with alioth? Have you
tried contacting the alioth admins about it if it's something that you
can't fix for yourself?
I still need to investigate it further, including checking its
config, then
* Osamu Aoki osamu_aoki_h...@nifty.com, 2014-04-23, 23:55:
If the package foo depends on the package libbar-dev and
libbar-dev is in new queue waiting for approval, can I upload the
package foo build on the sid chroot with the package libbar-dev
manually installed to it?
Or I should wait the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package yasm. The primary reason for
backporting yasm to wheezy is that my other recent upload/backport,
handbrake, depends on yasm = 1.2.0.
* Package name : yasm
Version : 1.2.0-1~bpo70+1
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package handbrake
* Package name: handbrake
Version : 0.9.9+dfsg-2~2.gbpa4c3e9~bpo70+1
Upstream Author : [HandBrake community (no single email address)]
* URL :
Hi,
2014-04-24 0:03 GMT+09:00 Yusuke YATSUO yyat...@debian.or.jp:
Hi,
I really appriciate your offer.
Since I have not recieved any other offers yet,
I'd like you to become my sponsor.
OK, I become your sponsor with pleasure.
Also, thanks for checking my package.
(Auch! There are a lot
12 matches
Mail list logo
