Re: Dual licence + linking openssl

Dariusz Dwornikowski writes: > I know that OpenSSL licence is incompatible with GPL but what when a > package linking to openssl is dual licenced under GPL and MIT. > Can I just "choose" MIT and say, hey they are compatible ? > Is such a package suitable for Debian ? Yes, and yes. There reall

Dual licence + linking openssl

Hi, I know that OpenSSL licence is incompatible with GPL but what when a package linking to openssl is dual licenced under GPL and MIT. Can I just "choose" MIT and say, hey they are compatible ? Is such a package suitable for Debian ? -- Dariusz Dwornikowski, Institute of Computing Science

RFS swiftmailer new upstream release

Hi all, I'm looking for a sponsor for the package swiftmailer that is already in debian. Upstream delivered a new release. There's no major changes in debian packaging. I can build the package and lintian did not complain about errors. The package : SwiftMailer - licence : MIT - version : 5

Re: [Openmama-dev] QPID dependencies

On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 02:15:18PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Ok, I guess this can be looked at this as part of the OpenMAMA package > update to get your packaged sponsored > > You have several wnpp bugs, I think the link I gave in the earlier email > is not the one you link in the changelog, s

Bug#747192: RFS: foomatic-filters/4.0.17-3 ITA

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "foomatic-filters" * Package name: foomatic-filters Version : 4.0.17-3 Upstream Author : Till Kamppeter * URL : http://www.openprinting.org/ * License

Bug#747169: RFS: socksjs-twisted/1.2.1-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "socksjs-twisted" * Package name: socksjs-twisted Version : 1.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Christopher Gamble * URL : http://github.com/Fugiman/sockjs-twisted * Lic