Dear Mentors,
libquazip is packaged for Debian in it's 0.5.x version. A new version
0.6.2 is available. I'm the packager of Debian libquazip (Debian Med
Team), Sergey (in cc) is the upstream manager of libquazip.
As I'm updating the package, I try to manage all registered bugs. One of
them is
tags 751277 help
thanks
I think to solve this the help of porters is needed since the build log
does not say much. Otherwise the only reasonable thing to do from my
side would be to exclude the package from the architectures in question
since it seems to be possible that the package will not run
Hi there,
I'm currently maintaining signing-party, and I have some questions
regarding the upgrade of debian/copyright to version 1.0. (I attach the
original file, and my attempt to upgrade it.)
signing-party being a collection of scripts, it has a lot of authors,
I'm unsure how detailed the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package steptalk.
It builds these binary packages:
steptalk - GNUstep Scripting Framework
libsteptalk-dev - GNUstep Scripting Framework (development files)
libsteptalk0 - GNUstep Scripting
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:23:51 +
with message-id e1wvugd-0008oz...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: cppman/0.3.1-1 [ITP] -- C++ 98/11 manual pages
for Linux, with source from cplusplus.com
has caused the Debian Bug report #734726,
regarding RFS: cppman/0.3.1-1
I posted gory technical details directly to the bug. This mail will be
only about general porting advices:
* Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu, 2014-06-13, 12:06:
I think to solve this the help of porters is needed since the build log
does not say much.
I don't think many porters read
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 07:11:05PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
Don't be afraid! :-) Fixing most portability doesn't require deep
knowledge about the architecture. It's often enough to be aware
about the basic differences between them, like endianness, bitness,
or whether unaligned access is
Dear Debian Mentors and Debian Lispers,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.0.5-1
of my package cl-launch.
It builds these binary packages:
cl-launch - uniform frontend to running Common Lisp code from the shell
The package appears to be lintian clean (except that I'm using
an old
* Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl, 2014-06-13, 19:35:
Don't be afraid! :-) Fixing most portability doesn't require deep
knowledge about the architecture. It's often enough to be aware about
the basic differences between them, like endianness, bitness, or
whether unaligned access is
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package crunch
* Package name: crunch
Version : 3.6-1
Upstream Author : Jason bof...@gmail.com
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/crunch-wordlist/
* License
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jun 2014 04:23:41 +
with message-id e1wvfvf-d3...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: shc/3.8.9-1 [ITP] -- Generic shell script compiler
has caused the Debian Bug report #735953,
regarding RFS: shc/3.8.9-1 [ITP] -- Generic shell script compiler
to be
On Sun, 2014-05-25 at 16:57 +0100, Dale Mellor wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Dale Mellor
dale_mel...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mcron
Package name
12 matches
Mail list logo
