On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> upstream of idba switched to Github and I have adapted the packaging here:
>
> svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/idba/trunk/
>
> It has turned out that the download tarball contains the source and what
> is supposted to be
Hi folks,
upstream of idba switched to Github and I have adapted the packaging here:
svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/idba/trunk/
It has turned out that the download tarball contains the source and what
is supposted to be the release tarball. Upstream has asked me for help
i
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jun 2014 04:23:51 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: python-nameparser/0.2.8-3 [ITP] -- By popular
DSA-team request!
has caused the Debian Bug report #736281,
regarding RFS: python-nameparser/0.2.8-3 [ITP] -- By popular DSA-team request!
to be marked as
Hello Jakub Wilk,
>Section: misc
>Perhaps it should be “Section: text”?
I believe that does not fit the description of the Text section
https://packages.debian.org/unstable/.
Next: Utilities to format and print text documents.
As the crunch creates lists of words and does not format or print te
> well, the command rmdir only removes a dir when it is empty.
The command rmdir wasn't mentioned in this thread. The OP said "remove the
empty directory /etc/apt.conf.d that shouldn't exits".
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:25:20 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: keyringer/0.2.9-2~bpo70+1 -- Distributed secret
management using GnuPG and Git
has caused the Debian Bug report #741644,
regarding RFS: keyringer/0.2.9-2~bpo70+1 -- Distributed secret management using
* Gisbert Friege , 2014-06-15, 12:58:
would you mind to give Dmaths another try?
I won't have time to look at it in the near future. Sorry!
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
* Jörg Frings-Fürst , 2014-06-20, 15:45:
I want to adopt the package dnprogs [1].
Now I have a prob with the version-number.
On the svn-Repo[2] the latest version is 2.62.
In unstable and testing the version is 2.63 with the changelog:
#
dnprogs (2.63) unstable; urgency=low
* Orphan the
Hallo,
I want to adopt the package dnprogs [1].
Now I have a prob with the version-number.
On the svn-Repo[2] the latest version is 2.62.
In unstable and testing the version is 2.63 with the changelog:
#
dnprogs (2.63) unstable; urgency=low
* Orphan the package
-- Chrissie Caulfield
9 matches
Mail list logo