Bug#738191: marked as done (RFS: klein/0.2.3-2 [ITP])

2014-06-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2014 04:23:49 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: klein/0.2.3-2 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #738191, regarding RFS: klein/0.2.3-2 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#751534: RFS: crunch/3.6-1 [ITP] -- tool for creating wordlist

2014-06-28 Thread Marcio de Souza Oliveira
>I see that upstream explicitly throws away return value of some fgets(3) >calls, but I don't think it's right. fgets() can fail, and such failure >should not be ignored. Please nudge upstream about this problem. You can be sure I nudge the upstream. Regards, -- Marcio Souza pgpBuTPZej9pJ

Bug#751534: RFS: crunch/3.6-1 [ITP] -- tool for creating wordlist

2014-06-28 Thread Marcio de Souza Oliveira
>>I put now GPL-2.0+ in debian/copyright >But that's not what upstream says. They say explicitly “version 2 only >of the License”. >Ping? I can't upload a package with incorrect d/copyright. I put now GPL-2.0. I was wrong because when I read: >License: GPL-2.0 > This package is free software;

Re: How to do a test sbuild with additional package, not in the repositories?

2014-06-28 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jun 28, 2014, at 09:13 PM, Daniel Lintott wrote: >The only thing I was able to find was this- >http://www.wefearchange.org/2011/09/sbuild-with-local-newer-dependencies.html I still use that setup extensively, most recently while adding Python 3 support to a stack of zope.* and other packages.

Re: How to do a test sbuild with additional package, not in the repositories?

2014-06-28 Thread Daniel Lintott
On 28/06/14 20:37, Paul Elliott wrote: > How do I get the one package that is not in unstable > (libwxsqlite3-3.0-dev) into sbuild's list of packages for a > test build? > I thought I'd seen this on the Debian sbuild wiki page... but alas it's not there! The only thing I was able to find was

How to do a test sbuild with additional package, not in the repositories?

2014-06-28 Thread Paul Elliott
I must prepare a new version of my package because of a transition. however they are holding one package that my package depends on, out of unstable because "that would start the transition". The package is libwxsqlite3-3.0-dev I want to be one jump ahead of them when they do do the transition.

Bug#751534: RFS: crunch/3.6-1 [ITP] -- tool for creating wordlist

2014-06-28 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Jakub Wilk , 2014-06-25, 21:35: I put now GPL-2.0+ in debian/copyright But that's not what upstream says. They say explicitly “version 2 only of the License”. Ping? I can't upload a package with incorrect d/copyright. GCC emits these warnings: crunch.c: In function 'main': crunch.c:2999:5

Bug#753021: RFS: cpl-plugin-muse/0.18.1+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- ESO data reduction pipeline for MUSE

2014-06-28 Thread Ole Streicher
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-as...@lists.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org, debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cpl-plugin-muse". * Package name: cpl-plugin-muse Version : 0.18.

Bug#753018: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-8 (fixes broken policyd-weight in unstable/testing rc bug #752845)

2014-06-28 Thread Werner Detter
Package: sponsorship-requests Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-8 (fixes broken policyd-weight in unstable/testing rc bug #752845) > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-6.dsc Sorry, right URL is, of course: dget -x http://mentor

Bug#753016: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-8 (fixes broken policyd-weight in unstable/testing rc bug #752845)

2014-06-28 Thread Werner Detter
Package: sponsorship-requests Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-8 Hi everybody, currently, policyd-weight is broken in unstable/testing due to recent libnet-dns-perl upgrade, technically speaking policyd-weight used Net::DNS::Packet function dh_expand() which does not exist anymore. This