On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> Upps. I don't have the info about the replacement.
>
> This info and the RM bug are not on the PTS.
The RM bug should be mentioned on the PTS but isn't, that seems like a
bug. Since we are transitioning the PTS to the package tracker, th
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
> * Anthony F McInerney [2014-07-30 23:46:03 +0100]:
>> The eet file source issues, i ran a 'find' and couldn't see the files your
>> talking about, could you name one or two explicitly for me?
>
> The two files I was talking about are:
>
Hello Paul,
thank you for your answer.
Am Donnerstag, den 31.07.2014, 12:10 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
>
> > What is the best way to stop this and the blocking bugs?
>
> Personally I don't understand your motivation for wanting to mainta
Heya,
* Anthony F McInerney [2014-07-30 23:46:03 +0100]:
> Hi Nicolas
>
> The eet file source issues, i ran a 'find' and couldn't see the files your
> talking about, could you name one or two explicitly for me?
The two files I was talking about are:
./src/bin/app_server_eet.c
./src/bin/app_ser
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> What is the best way to stop this and the blocking bugs?
Personally I don't understand your motivation for wanting to maintain
tslib (evdev should replace it), but if you don't think the package
should be removed, you should close the RM
Hi Eriberto,
Thank you for taking the time to look over the package.
1 to 5 done. Do you want me to upload a 2.8.2+dfsg-2 with my changes for
review?
EDIT: dpkg: warning: while removing sandboxgamemaker, directory
'/usr/share/sandboxgamemaker' not empty so not removed
After removing postrm i got
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:49:45 -0300
with message-id <20140730224945.4f3033dc5b947c37325dd...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: helpviewer.app/0.3-8 [RC] -- Online help viewer for
GNUstep programs
has caused the Debian Bug report #756559,
regarding RFS: helpviewer.app/0.3-8 [RC]
tags 755049 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Johan,
Please:
1. Update the packaging years in d/copyright.
2. If you removed files from original tarball, add a dfsg suffix to version.
3. Fix these lintian messages:
I: libhpdf-2.3.0: hardening-no-fortify-functions
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhpdf-2.3.0.so
I:
Hi Nicolas
The eet file source issues, i ran a 'find' and couldn't see the files your
talking about, could you name one or two explicitly for me?
When i mentioned them, the terminology devs seemed to think they were
config files. (enlightenment has a thing about putting text into 'machine
code' f
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "helpviewer.app".
It builds these binary packages:
helpviewer.app - Online help viewer for GNUstep programs
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
retitle 756042 RFS: sandboxgamemaker/2.8.2+dfsg-1 [ITA][RC]
tags 756042 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Anthony.
Please:
1. Fix the Vcs* in d/control. The correct addresses are:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-games/sandboxgamemaker.git
git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-games/sandboxgamemaker.git
(in GIT y
Ohh no!!! I am Brazilian... Not native too. Sorry.
Please, close your RFS to avoid double efforts.
Thanks for your reply.
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-07-30 17:14 GMT-03:00 Daniel Echeverry :
> Hi Eriberto!
>
> Thank you very much for review my package :) however another dd has
> contacted me and we
Hi Eriberto!
Thank you very much for review my package :) however another dd has
contacted me and we are working to upload this new version in debian
However taking advantage of your help, and because I am not a native
english speaker and my sponsor told me it would be good to update the
descript
tags 739911 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Marius,
Please, update the d/copyright, putting all upstream names. See main.c. You
should add the packaging years of Aaron (search this information in
https://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gtk-theme-switch.html). Add any other
maintainer if needed.
Thanks for your w
Hello,
at the moment I'm working on tslib to adopt the package.
I see that there is a RM bug[1] for tslib.
I would like to continue working on it, hence my question:
What is the best way to stop this and the blocking bugs?
CU
Jörg
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=75176
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:58:28 -0300
with message-id <20140730155828.ee76db3ddb4ffa1aebcbd...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: nield/0.5.1-1 [ITP] -- generate logs related to
network interfaces
has caused the Debian Bug report #748893,
regarding RFS: nield/0.5.1-1 [ITP] -- gener
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:56:35 -0300
with message-id <20140730155635.a5b47cbe3ff4b73fc7b95...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: goldeneye/0.0~git20140221.7a38fe93-1 [ITP] -- HTTP
DoS test tool
has caused the Debian Bug report #749532,
regarding RFS: goldeneye/0.0~git20140221.7a38
Control: owner -1 !
Hey bofh80,
* bofh80 [2014-07-14 16:27:40 +0100]:
> Thanks for the feedback, I've uploaded 0.6.1 with an extra depends.
> I've checked in a vm without e17 installed this time to make sure it works
> first.
> If you'd be so kind as to check the new version and let me know?
>
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:54:49 -0300
with message-id <20140730155449.828271d45f8559ffb36c5...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: liblinux-inotify2-perl/1:1.22-1 [ITA] -- scalable
directory and file change notification
has caused the Debian Bug report #753649,
regarding RFS: liblin
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:53:33 -0300
with message-id <20140730155333.2af5ddfad433f13baadc9...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: qdacco/0.8.2-2 (package already in Debian)
has caused the Debian Bug report #669411,
regarding RFS: qdacco/0.8.2-2 [RC]: package already in Debian with R
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:53:33 -0300
with message-id <20140730155333.2af5ddfad433f13baadc9...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: qdacco/0.8.2-2 (package already in Debian)
has caused the Debian Bug report #669411,
regarding RFS: qdacco/0.8.2-2 (package already in Debian)
to be mark
tags 755842 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Daniel,
I have some issues and suggestions for your package.
d/copyright:
- In source code, there are upstream files dated as 2014.
- I don't found the images/nuvola directory.
- The Lawrence Murray files are using GPL-2.0+.
Please, remove the extra blank l
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:24:37 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: pythondialog/3.0.1-1 ITA NMU
has caused the Debian Bug report #741465,
regarding RFS: pythondialog/3.0.1-1 ITA NMU
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Thanks for your interest in the package. I am the submitter and I
haven't gotten any feedback so far on the package, so I assume it is
simply waiting for somebody to have time to review it. It is almost
identical to the current mariadb-5.5 package in Debian, so there
shouldn't be any actual issues
Am 30.07.14 01:46, schrieb Paul Wise:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Werner Detter wrote:
>
>> Upload didn't work with message:
>
> Fixed now.
Thanks, upload worked.
Cheers,
Werner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
25 matches
Mail list logo
