Re: RFS: cl-launch (updated package)

2014-08-19 Thread Faré
Dear Debian Mentors and Debian Lispers, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.1-2 of my package "cl-launch". It builds these binary packages: cl-launch - uniform frontend to running Common Lisp code from the shell The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on

Bug#748613: marked as done (RFS: gimagereader/2.93-1 [ITP])

2014-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Aug 2014 23:36:37 -0300 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#748613: RFS: gimagereader/2.93-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #748613, regarding RFS: gimagereader/2.93-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#758682: marked as done (RFS: thuban/1.2.2-6)

2014-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:04:17 +1200 with message-id <20140820020417.GA7396@gemse> and subject line Re: Bug#758682: RFS: thuban/1.2.2-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #758682, regarding RFS: thuban/1.2.2-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#748613: RFS: gimagereader/2.93-1 [ITP]

2014-08-19 Thread Eriberto
2014-08-19 19:45 GMT-03:00 Philip Rinn : >> The d/changelog is wrong. The first upload must be: >> >> gimagereader (2.93-1) unstable; urgency=low >> >> * Initial release (closes: #748350) >> >> -- Philip Rinn Tue, 19 Aug 2014 17:07:34 +0200 > > I don't mind, I changed it now but I don't see th

Bug#758682: RFS: thuban/1.2.2-6

2014-08-19 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "thuban" Package name: thuban Version : 1.2.2-6 Upstream Author : Thuban Project Team URL : http://thuban.intevation.org License : GPL-2.0+ Section

Bug#748613: RFS: gimagereader/2.93-1 [ITP]

2014-08-19 Thread Philip Rinn
On 19.08.2014 18:18, Eriberto wrote: >>> - Add 'export V=1' to show all compiler flags. If you want read >>> about it, $ man blhc. > > > You forgot this step... Ups, didn't commit the this change. > The d/changelog is wrong. The first upload must be: > > gimagereader (2.93-1) unstable; urg

Re: Bug#756654: ITP: rohc -- RObust Header Compression (ROHC) library

2014-08-19 Thread Jakub Wilk
I don't intend to sponsor this package. Sorry! ;-P * Simon Paillard , 2014-08-19, 21:49: rohc is my first library package, I'd welcome a review. I'd be glad if someone can have a look: dsc at https://people.debian.org/~spaillard/rohc/1.7.0/rohc_1.7.0-1.dsc It would be probably a good idea to

Re: Fw: Bug#756654: ITP: rohc -- RObust Header Compression (ROHC) library

2014-08-19 Thread Simon Paillard
Hi, On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 03:07:44PM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote: > rohc is my first library package, I'd welcome a review. I'd be glad if someone can have a look: dsc at https://people.debian.org/~spaillard/rohc/1.7.0/rohc_1.7.0-1.dsc > My ITP is attached. [..] > Full lintian output at > htt

Bug#748613: RFS: gimagereader/2.93-1 [ITP]

2014-08-19 Thread Eriberto
2014-08-19 12:25 GMT-03:00 Philip Rinn : > Hi Eriberto, Hi! >> - Add 'export V=1' to show all compiler flags. If you want read >> about it, $ man blhc. You forgot this step... > > I updated the files on m.d.n: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gimagereader The d/changelog is wrong. The

Bug#751009: RFS: ppp-gatekeeper/0.1.0-201406111015-1 [ITP]

2014-08-19 Thread Eriberto Mota
Hi Nigel, To submit a new package to Debian you need an ITP[1]. Your package haven't an ITP. Please, fix it. Regards, Eriberto [1] https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#l1 2014-06-11 7:54 GMT-03:00 Nigel Kukard : > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am loo

Bug#748613: RFS: gimagereader/2.93-1 [ITP]

2014-08-19 Thread Philip Rinn
Hi Eriberto, On 18.08.2014 22:06, Eriberto Mota wrote: > Hi Philip, > > In gimagereader, please: > > 1. Fix this Linitian message: desktop-entry-lacks-keywords-entry Added a patch for that. Although I was not too creative with my keywords. > 2. Create a VCS to control your /debian versions. Yo

Bug#758646: RFS: ryu/3.12-1 [ITP]

2014-08-19 Thread Dariusz Dwornikowski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [wishlist] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ryu" * Package name: ryu Version : 3.12-1 Upstream Author : Ryu Project Team * URL : http://osrg.gi

Bug#736672: marked as done (ITP: hh - BASH history suggest box)

2014-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:54:31 -0300 with message-id and subject line Re: ITP: hh - BASH history suggest box has caused the Debian Bug report #736672, regarding ITP: hh - BASH history suggest box to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

2014-08-19 Thread Eriberto Mota
tags 758163 thanks Hi Shawn, To submit a new package to Debian you need an ITP[1]. Your package is closing thisRFS bug instead an ITP. Please, fix it. Regards, Eriberto [1] https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#l1 2014-08-14 18:52 GMT-03:00 Shawn Sörbom : > Package: sponsorship-requests > Seve

Bug#749575: marked as done (RFS: neopi/0.0+git20120821-1 [ITP])

2014-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:23:30 -0300 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#749575: RFS: neopi/0.0+git20120821-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #749575, regarding RFS: neopi/0.0+git20120821-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#757176: RFS: xombrero/2:1.6.3-1 -- Minimalist's web browser

2014-08-19 Thread Eriberto
Hi Luis, I think you misunderstood my comments. I will try be clear: you can't add an imaginary license. So, remove the imaginary licenses from d/copyright and I will can upload your package. Thus, the files as png and xpm will use the same license of the whole package. Thanks, Eriberto 2014-

Bug#749575: RFS: neopi/0.0+git20120821-1 [ITP]

2014-08-19 Thread Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
On 19 August 2014 14:45, Eriberto wrote: > > You forgot to put 2010-2012 > Fixed. > > Good! Another detail: please, remove the useless first line. > Done. > > Thanks for your work. Waiting for you to upload the package. > Uploaded [0]. Thanks! [0] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main

Bug#741648: RFS: cbootimage/1.2-2

2014-08-19 Thread Eriberto Mota
tags 741648 moreinfo thanks Hi Marc, Please: 1. d/control: - Consider change the priority to optional. Please, read it[1]. - Change debhelper from 9.0.0 to 9. - Create a VCS to control your /debian versions. You can use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cv

Bug#749575: RFS: neopi/0.0+git20120821-1 [ITP]

2014-08-19 Thread Eriberto
2014-08-19 6:53 GMT-03:00 Arturo Borrero Gonzalez : >> 4. d/copyright: the upstream copyright years must be 2010-2012 and the >> license is clearly GPL-3+. >> > > Done. You forgot to put 2010-2012 >> 6. d/rules: I suggest you use a file d/install instead the >> override_dh_install. But you can k

Bug#742077: RFS: vcmi/0.95-1 [ITP]

2014-08-19 Thread Eriberto Mota
2014-08-18 12:47 GMT-03:00 Johannes Schauer : > Hi Eriberto, Hi Johannes. Thanks for your reply. > Quoting Eriberto (2014-08-18 16:55:20) >> I saw your package in mentors.debian.org and it has several Lintian messages. >> >> IMHO, to get a sponsor you must, at least, clear your package removing

Who will set ACLs for a collab-maint project?

2014-08-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I'd like to offer commit permissions to a non-DD (linrunner-guest on Alioth) to git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/tlp.git The collab-maint Wiki page[1] just says: Since we want to open the access to many external contributors, we should be able to restrict their access to the

Bug#749575: RFS: neopi/0.0+git20120821-1 [ITP]

2014-08-19 Thread Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
On 17 August 2014 19:20, Eriberto Mota wrote: > > 1. Change the tarball name to neopi-0.0+git20120821.98. I am > asking for it because we can have several commits in a same day. > Done. > 2. d/compat: change to 9. Done. > > 3. d/control: change Section to web and Priority to optional. Remo

Bug#758056: RFS: binwalk/2.0.1-1

2014-08-19 Thread Vincent Cheng
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "binwalk" > > * Package name: binwalk >Version : 2.0.1-1 >Upstrea

Bug#757442: RFS: polyphone/1.4 [RFP]

2014-08-19 Thread Davy Triponney
Regarding the libraries, I can adapt the sources so that I can use the packaged versions of qcustomplot, rtmidi and stk. A lot of changes has been made in vmpk. The author contacted me a few months ago to try a merge of the added features but some has not been accepted (incompatibilities with futu