Bug#758818: marked as done (RFS: liblas/1.8.0-1)

2014-08-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Aug 2014 04:24:58 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: liblas/1.8.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #758818, regarding RFS: liblas/1.8.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#748591: RFS: gtkspellmm/3.0.3+dfsg-1 [ITP]

2014-08-21 Thread Eriberto
2014-08-21 18:09 GMT-03:00 Philip Rinn : > Hi Eriberto, > > On 20.08.2014 23:13, Eriberto Mota wrote: > >> 1. d/copyright: remove build/ltmain.sh. This file needn't be put (read the >> license). > > Are you sure? Don't I still have to name the copyright holder? removed it for > now. Yeap! It is t

Bug#748591: RFS: gtkspellmm/3.0.3+dfsg-1 [ITP] (was: Re: Bug#748613: RFS: gimagereader/2.93-1 [ITP])

2014-08-21 Thread Eriberto Mota
Please, in my text: "So, remove all .a and .la references. Remove the .so and make a synlink to .so created by libgtkspellmm-3.0-0.install (create a d/libgtkspellmm-3.0-dev.links file). (NEWS: after a debuild, I saw that the Makefile created the symlink - check if is ok)" Ignore: "Remove the .so

Bug#748591: RFS: gtkspellmm/3.0.3+dfsg-1 [ITP]

2014-08-21 Thread Philip Rinn
Hi Eriberto, On 20.08.2014 23:13, Eriberto Mota wrote: > 1. d/copyright: remove build/ltmain.sh. This file needn't be put (read the > license). Are you sure? Don't I still have to name the copyright holder? removed it for now. > 2. d/libgtkspellmm-3.0-dev.install > > From Maintainers Guide[1]

Bug#754109: RFS: mailgraph/1.14-12 [ITA]

2014-08-21 Thread Eriberto
tags 754109 moreinfo thanks Hi! Please: 1. d/copyright: see it[1] and put the correct range of the years for each Debian maintainer. 2. d/mailgraph.dirs: d/mailgraph.install already create dirs usr/bin and usr/lib/cgi-bin. Remove these lines. 3. Your package doesn't build twice. To fix, in d/

Bug#758815: RFS: libircclient/1.8-1 [ITA]

2014-08-21 Thread Eriberto
2014-08-21 17:33 GMT-03:00 Paul Wise : > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Eriberto Mota wrote: > >> I know. An official documentation is >> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/advanced.en.html. But I >> think that, in this case, we need follow the Debian Policy, right? > > Debian Policy

Bug#758815: RFS: libircclient/1.8-1 [ITA]

2014-08-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Eriberto Mota wrote: > I know. An official documentation is > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/advanced.en.html. But I > think that, in this case, we need follow the Debian Policy, right? Debian Policy doesn't mandate or suggest the inclusion of stat

Bug#758815: RFS: libircclient/1.8-1 [ITA]

2014-08-21 Thread Eriberto
2014-08-21 17:08 GMT-03:00 Paul Wise : > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Eriberto Mota wrote: > >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2014/04/msg00057.html > > This is my personal opinion, it is not official Debian Policy. I know. An official documentation is https://www.debian.org/doc/manu

Bug#758815: RFS: libircclient/1.8-1 [ITA]

2014-08-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Eriberto Mota wrote: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2014/04/msg00057.html This is my personal opinion, it is not official Debian Policy. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian

Bug#758815: RFS: libircclient/1.8-1 [ITA]

2014-08-21 Thread Eriberto Mota
2014-08-21 16:37 GMT-03:00 Jakub Wilk : > * Eriberto Mota , 2014-08-21, 16:16: > >> 4. libircclient-dev.install: remove .a. From Maintainers Guide[2]: >> >> Shared libraries are distributed as *.so files. (Neither *.a files nor >> *.la files) > > > Policy §8.3 permits shipping static libraries in t

Bug#758815: RFS: libircclient/1.8-1 [ITA]

2014-08-21 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Eriberto Mota , 2014-08-21, 16:16: 4. libircclient-dev.install: remove .a. From Maintainers Guide[2]: Shared libraries are distributed as *.so files. (Neither *.a files nor *.la files) Policy §8.3 permits shipping static libraries in the -dev package: “The static library () is usually prov

Bug#758815: RFS: libircclient/1.8-1 [ITA]

2014-08-21 Thread Eriberto Mota
tags 758815 moreinfo thanks Hi Dariusz. Please: 1. d/changelog: add an explanation about why your removed the -dfsg. Please, see the field 'Source' in d/copyright header. 2. d/control: in 'Package: libircclient-dev', remove 'Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}'. 3. d/copyright: - Fix the 'So

Bug#758818: RFS: liblas/1.8.0-1

2014-08-21 Thread Ross Gammon
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "liblas" * Package name: liblas Version : 1.8.0-1 * URL : http://liblas.org/ * License : BSD-3 Section

Bug#753943: RFS: gcstar/1.7.0-1 [ITA]

2014-08-21 Thread Eriberto
2014-08-21 10:59 GMT-03:00 Jörg Frings-Fürst : >> 2. d/copyright: >> - 2006-2011 to Alexander Wirt. You forgot it. >> - I found several names and years. Please, use 'grep -sri >> copyright * | grep -v debian' and review d/copyright carefully. >> > done > Please, use chronological ord

Bug#758715: RFS: bgfinancas/2.0-1 [ITP]‏

2014-08-21 Thread Eriberto
Hi José, I don't like to sponsor Java programs because it is a bit confuse for me. However, as you are Brazilian, I will try it. So, please: 1. d/compat: change to 9. 2. d/control: - Update debhelper to 9. - Break the Build-Depends line to make easy the visualization. Two examples are[1]

Bug#758815: RFS: libircclient/1.8-1 [ITA]

2014-08-21 Thread Dariusz Dwornikowski
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libircclient" * Package name: libircclient Version : 1.8-1 Upstream Author : George Yunaev * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/libircclient/ * Licen

RE: Bug#758715: RFS: bgfinancas/2.0-1 [ITP]‏

2014-08-21 Thread José Robson Mariano Alves
> Personally I would find it quite bothersome if I had to set the language > for every program instead of just setting a locale for my user and > having everything following it. > > Users on shared computers can easily (I believe: how easy may depend on the > desktop environment used) set thei

Bug#753943: RFS: gcstar/1.7.0-1 [ITA]

2014-08-21 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
Hola Eriberto, first thank you for reviewing gcstar. Am Mittwoch, den 20.08.2014, 13:42 -0300 schrieb Eriberto Mota: > tags 753943 moreinfo > thanks > > Hi again Jörg. :-) > > Please, > > 1. d/control: change from 'internet' to 'Internet' in long description. ok. > 2. d/copyright: > - 200

Re: Bug#758715: RFS: bgfinancas/2.0-1 [ITP]‏

2014-08-21 Thread Elena ``of Valhalla''
On 2014-08-21 at 14:38:53 +0300, José Robson Mariano Alves wrote: > > I think it would be best to just use the user's locale to decide which > > language to display. > Hi Paul, the user decide is better, because some users have systems in > English and prefer the Portuguese language, or otherwise.

Bug#758715: RFS: bgfinancas/2.0-1 [ITP]‏

2014-08-21 Thread José Robson Mariano Alves
> Your package and program are in Brazilian Portuguese. Hi, i change my package to english. The program is in English and Brazilian Portuguese. I will add more languages in the future. Regards, José Robson Mariano Alves

Re: Build-depending on non-free package

2014-08-21 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Ole Streicher wrote: > Paul Wise writes: > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: > >> I am just looking for a solution for this problem... > > > > It might be easier to port the software to something that isn't > > non-free so the package can be put in main.

Bug#758715: RFS: bgfinancas/2.0-1 [ITP]‏

2014-08-21 Thread José Robson Mariano Alves
> I think it would be best to just use the user's locale to decide which > language to display. Hi Paul, the user decide is better, because some users have systems in English and prefer the Portuguese language, or otherwise. I have friends who think this way. Example: people learning new languag

Aw: [Debichem-devel] Bug#747259: [Help] gfortran problem: Cannot assign to a named constant

2014-08-21 Thread Daniel Leidert
   Hi,   Remove the "new line" (in your code \newline, see below) between the IF and THEN statements. Or else add the missing END IF statement. That should do the trick.   HTH and regards, Daniel   Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. August 2014 um 08:47 Uhr Von: "Andreas Tille" An: "Debian Mentors