On 16. September 2014 21:24:13 MESZ, Daniel Lintott
wrote:
>Hi Guys,
>
>On 16/09/14 07:23, Tobias Frost wrote:
>>
>> There are no indications that the package has been orphaned, so it
>> likely hasn't.
>>
>
>In case your not aware, it seems the package has now been orphaned[1]
>as
>of today (ex
Hello Stephen,
Am Dienstag, den 16.09.2014, 20:06 +0200 schrieb Stephen Kitt:
> Hi Jörg,
>
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:26:04 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst
> wrote:
[...]
>
> I've got the package removed from the new queue, but I noticed a couple more
> changes I'd like to see in the package:
> * rm_c
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 08:40:06AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I wonder how this can be done in the packaging process and whether we
> have any example for doing this.
Have a look at /usr/share/doc/libgtest-dev/examples/make/Makefile, it at
least helped me greatly to come up with proper runes to
tags 712787 -moreinfo
thanks
Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2014, 09:07:04 schrieb Eriberto Mota:
> tags 712787 moreinfo
> thanks
>
>
> Hi Martin,
HI Eriberto,
>
> You didn't put the ITP number in d/changelog.
Did so now.
> To make easier the review, please, upload your package to
> mentors.de
On 16.09.14 21:13:13, Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 09:07 +0200, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
>
> > > Hi Dariusz,
> > >
> > > somehow the d/copyright is still not matching 100% to the code...
> > > At least for many files there is a "Copyright (c) 2005-2009 Collecta,
> > > Inc" whic
Hi Jackson,
thanks for your input.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:10:24AM +1000, Jackson Doak wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Would it be possible to build infernal on i386 again, and use a script to
> check for SSE2 support?
>
> For example, The package "ikarus", also requires SSE2 support.
> It has a che
On 17. September 2014 12:10:32 MESZ, Dariusz Dwornikowski
wrote:
>On 16.09.14 21:13:13, Tobias Frost wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 09:07 +0200, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
>>
>> We're there, almost... Last question: Do you want to change the
>license
>> of debian/* also to MIT and GPL-3 (with
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
* Version : 2.9.4-1
* Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL-2+, LGPL-3+
* Se
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fadecut"
* Package name: fadecut
Version : 0.1.4-1
Upstream Author : Marco Balmer, Martin Gafner
* URL : https://gi
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "s3fs-fuse"
* Package name: s3fs-fuse
Version : 1.78-1
Upstream Author : Randy Rizun
* URL : https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse
* License : GPLv2
Your message dated Wed, 17 Sep 2014 20:50:19 +0200
with message-id <1410979819.3748.4.ca...@edoras.loewenhoehle.ip>
and subject line Re: Bug#761643: RFS: libstrophe/0.8.6-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #761643,
regarding RFS: libstrophe/0.8.6-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that
I'm not able to make it, but the ideal way would be to make preinst that
notifies the user that the program won't start, and gives them the option
to cancel the install there.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Jackson,
>
> thanks for your input.
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 201
Hi Pierre,
2014-09-16 16:13 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff :
> 2.
> - Done.
Please, read again my instructions in item 2 in last mail. You didn't
changed the Depends field.
> - My work is now on GitHub: https://github.com/Rudloff/lutris-debian
> GitHub uses the same URL for browser
OK, I removed it. Thanks!
Le 17/09/2014 05:11, Andrey Rahmatullin a écrit :
README.source is not needed if you don't repack the upstream tarball and use
dpkg to apply patches. See
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-readmesource
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-
Hi Jörg,
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:15:34 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst
wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 16.09.2014, 20:06 +0200 schrieb Stephen Kitt:
> > Hi Jörg,
> >
> > On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:26:04 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst
> > wrote:
>
> [...]
> >
> > I've got the package removed from the new queue, but I
Hi Martin,
About your package, please:
1. Use DH 9 instead DH 8.
2. d/control:
- Change Priority from 'extra' to 'optional'.
- The Homepage field and VCS point to a site that says 'The
project you're trying to access has been archived'.
3. d/copyright:
- In header, the field 'Source
The solution recently added to Julia is to check, and if necessary abort
with an error, on starting the program itself:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-julia/julia.git/tree/debian/patches/require-sse2-on-i386.patch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
Hello,
Le 17/09/2014 22:12, Eriberto a écrit :
Hi Pierre,
2014-09-16 16:13 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff :
2.
- Done.
Please, read again my instructions in item 2 in last mail. You didn't
changed the Depends field.
Sorry, I changed the Build-Depends field and forgot the Depends field.
tags 748878 moreinfo
thanks
Hi again Jörg,
I am ready to review your package. Can you update the package to make
easier my review?
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-05-21 15:29 GMT-03:00 Jörg Frings-Fürst :
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a s
Am Mittwoch, 17. September 2014, 17:47:29 schrieb Eriberto:
> Hi Martin,
Hi Eriberto,
> About your package, please:
>
> 1. Use DH 9 instead DH 8.
>
> 2. d/control:
> - Change Priority from 'extra' to 'optional'.
> - The Homepage field and VCS point to a site that says 'The
> project you
Hi,
2014-09-17 17:41 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff :
>>> 3.
>>> - I am not sure I understand. It does use the 1.0 format.
>>> - Where should I list the upstream authors? I don't see a field
>>> for
>>> this in the 1.0 format.
>>
>>
>>
>> You can consult any copyright in Debian package
Your message dated Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:27:15 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#762011: RFS: roxterm/2.9.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #762011,
regarding RFS: roxterm/2.9.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Thu, 18 Sep 2014 04:24:53 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: conman/0.2.7-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #746257,
regarding RFS: conman/0.2.7-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 05:12:54PM -0300, Eriberto wrote:
> > 6. I have added a generic README.source about quilt. Is this OK?
> No. My idea was talk about the original debian directory removed from
> upstream code.
The original debian/ is removed by dpkg-source when unpacking 3.0 (quilt)
packages,
24 matches
Mail list logo
