Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dbuskit".
It builds these binary packages:
libdbuskit-dev - GNUstep framework that interfaces with D-Bus (development
files)
libdbuskit0 - GNUstep framework that interfaces with D-Bus (run
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "systempreferences.app".
It builds these binary packages:
libpreferencepanes-dev - GNUstep preferences library - development files
libpreferencepanes1 - GNUstep preferences library - runtime
Your message dated Mon, 10 Nov 2014 04:23:33 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: gnumail/1.2.2-1 -- Mail client for GNUstep [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #768146,
regarding RFS: gnumail/1.2.2-1 -- Mail client for GNUstep [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Christian Kastner wrote:
> I'd appreciate feedback on the idea; and if this turns out to be
> worthwhile I'll look into an implementation.
Excellent idea, please do work on implementing it.
That said, debexpo (mentors.d.n codebase) development has basically
stopp
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, bilibop project wrote:
> My question is: is it welcome to file a bug report against my own package ?
Absolutely! File bugs early, and often.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
I don't care how poor and inefficient a little country is; they lik
Hello,
El dom, 9 de nov 2014 a las 3:18 , bilibop project
escribió:
Hi,
I'm probably off-topic, but I fail to find the proper debian list for
this issue:
I've found two bugs in packages I maintain: an important bug in an
optional
package, and a RC bug in another package. Nobody has reported
Hi,
I'm probably off-topic, but I fail to find the proper debian list for this
issue:
I've found two bugs in packages I maintain: an important bug in an optional
package, and a RC bug in another package. Nobody has reported them. The
Freeze Policy [1] says that the fixes for these bugs may be inc
On Sun, 09 Nov 2014, Christian Kastner wrote:
> With the recent gamification of just-about-everything, I was wondering
> whether following such an achievement-oriented approach, with
> opportunities for contribution formulated as a list of specific tasks,
> instead of general avenues, would be help
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sfarkxtc"
* Package name: sfarkxtc
Version : 0.20130812git80b1da3-1
Upstream Author : Andy Inman
* URL : https://github.com/raboof/sfarkxtc
* License
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sfarklib"
* Package name: sfarklib
Version : 0.20131219gitee08d0c-1
Upstream Author : Andy Inman
* URL : https://github.com/raboof/sfArkLib
* License
The first steps in contributing to Debian are usually the hardest.
Normally, new contributors are pointed to the standard docs [eg:
1,2,3,4,5], but processing such an amount of information is often a
daunting task, and not a very fun one either.
On the other hand, we have quite a few mentors who w
Thanks!
On Sunday, November 09, 2014 13:17:36 Eriberto Mota wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
> I uploaded your package to experimental, to honor the Jessie freeze
> policy[1].
>
> Thanks for your work.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Eriberto
>
> [1] https://release.debian.org/jessie/freeze_policy.html
>
> 2014-11-07 2
Your message dated Sun, 09 Nov 2014 16:23:35 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: spatialindex/1.8.5-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #768625,
regarding RFS: spatialindex/1.8.5-1~exp1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Sun, 9 Nov 2014 16:42:38 +0100
with message-id <20141109154238.gb32...@hermes.rxsoft.eu>
and subject line Closing RFS: cronolog/1.6.2+rpk-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #767585,
regarding RFS: cronolog/1.6.2+rpk-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Sun, 9 Nov 2014 16:41:41 +0100
with message-id <20141109154140.ga32...@hermes.rxsoft.eu>
and subject line Closing RFS: pacpl/4.0.5-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #767271,
regarding RFS: pacpl/4.0.5-8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Sun, 9 Nov 2014 13:17:36 -0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #758163,
regarding RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Hi Shawn,
I uploaded your package to experimental, to honor the Jessie freeze policy[1].
Thanks for your work.
Cheers,
Eriberto
[1] https://release.debian.org/jessie/freeze_policy.html
2014-11-07 23:14 GMT-02:00 Shawn Sörbom :
> Hi Eriberto,
> I found time to work on kcm-ufw this week.
> I m
Your message dated Sun, 09 Nov 2014 12:32:19 +0100
with message-id <545f50c3.4010...@xs4all.nl>
and subject line Re: Bug#764951: RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #764951,
regarding RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 06:17:12PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>
> Can you try libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1 once more now that the buildds
> are done with gdal?
Done
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
19 matches
Mail list logo
