On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Eric Shattow wrote:
> Updated at m.d.o although actually there is a new major version
> audiotools 3.0 updated for Python3 and I'm also working on this.
I get a different error this time; looks like yet another missing
build-dep. Please test build your package in a
Updated at m.d.o although actually there is a new major version
audiotools 3.0 updated for Python3 and I'm also working on this.
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Eric Shattow wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:33:58 -0700 Vincent
Hi Dmitry,
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Dmitry Borisyuk wrote:
> Dear Vincent,
>
> Thanks for your review.
>
> The purpose of debian/patches/debian-changes-0.1.95+gtk2-3.2.patch
> was to switch to source format 3.0 (quilt). It contains the changes
> between the upstream and Debian version 3.2.
Dear Vincent,
Thanks for your review.
The purpose of debian/patches/debian-changes-0.1.95+gtk2-3.2.patch
was to switch to source format 3.0 (quilt). It contains the changes
between the upstream and Debian version 3.2. Many files were changed,
not just autoconf-related ones, so I need this patch t
I keep forgetting to post this, but I have changed the name of the package to
kde-config-systemd. Sorry if this causes any inconvenience.
On Tuesday, December 23, 2014 23:51:28 Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> 2014-12-23 0:56 GMT+01:00 Shawn Sörbom :
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: wishli
Sorry. I made a typo. It should be ITA instead.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/CAHhoPsTj5DyZ=au5xvpffm2yccknwcaagh7y8ezfhmzd3tu...@mail.gmail.com
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I've uploaded a new version of rc to m.d.n:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/rc
Jakub Wilk (current rc maintainer) will be the sponsor.
I file this RFS bug because: (as Jakub suggested)
- wnpp bugs are not very visible, whereas RFS
On 01/04/2015 03:55 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
> Is there a specific reason you are targeting experimental and not unstable?
Mostly because it's not targeted for migration to jessie.
> Can this package be used by Osgeo live or is there a reason not to do
> so (Angelos recently packaged version
Bas,
Is there a specific reason you are targeting experimental and not unstable?
Can this package be used by Osgeo live or is there a reason not to do
so (Angelos recently packaged version 0.4.1)?
Keep up the good work!
Johan
https://launchpad.net/~osgeolive/+archive/ubuntu/nightly/+packages
-
9 matches
Mail list logo
