Le 05/02/2015 13:39, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda a écrit :
El Dijous, 5 de febrer de 2015, a les 11:09:23, Corentin Desfarges va
escriure:
Le 05/02/2015 10:50, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda a écrit :
El Dijous, 5 de febrer de 2015, a les 10:24:25, Corentin Desfarges va
escriure:
Are you sure that
Le 05/02/2015 14:50, Corentin Desfarges a écrit :
Le 05/02/2015 11:40, Andreas Tille a écrit :
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:50:15AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
wrote:
By the way, we have to add wget as build-deps of the package in
d/control.
No, it's the lack of wget as build
El Dijous, 5 de febrer de 2015, a les 11:09:23, Corentin Desfarges va
escriure:
Le 05/02/2015 10:50, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda a écrit :
El Dijous, 5 de febrer de 2015, a les 10:24:25, Corentin Desfarges va
escriure:
Are you sure that in build time do you need to download some data? is
Le 05/02/2015 11:40, Andreas Tille a écrit :
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:50:15AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
By the way, we have to add wget as build-deps of the package in d/control.
No, it's the lack of wget as build dependency. I'm trying to build again the
package. I have
If the several hours are spent compiling with gcc (likely), another
option is ccache; this is a little slower, but works across pbuilder
sessions (though deliberately not gcc upgrades, common in sid),
and is less likely to break things by reusing files it shouldn't
(as it requires the compiler
Dear Mentors,
I have a simple question : Is there a way to keep the files got with the
command pdebuild when we launch a new build with pdebuild, to save time
when we work on very big packages which last hours ?
Same thing about about the debuild command. I know the -nc option, but
if I make a
Le 05/02/2015 10:24, Corentin Desfarges a écrit :
Are you sure that in build time do you need to download some data? is
this
acceptable?
Leopold
Yes I need to download the data, else the unit tests can't pass... And I
can't
include the data into the package, because of its the size (more
On 02/05/2015 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
I: pybuild base:170: python3.4 setup.py clean
WARNING:root:Failed to get options via gdal-config: [Errno 2] No such file or
directory: 'gdal-config'
CRITICAL:root:Cython.Build.cythonize not found. Cython is required to build
from a repo.
E:
Hi Johan,
when trying to build fiona I get:
...
Cythonizing fiona/ogrext.pyx
/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py:267: UserWarning: Unknown distribution
option: 'metadata_version'
warnings.warn(msg)
/usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py:267: UserWarning: Unknown distribution
option:
Strange,
gdal-config (libgdal-dev) and cython are in the control file.
Something strange seems to be happening in that pbuilder.
It works for me in unstable. You will need a recent update of unstable
as fiona relies on python-cligj which was only added yesterday.
Also fiona requires a recent
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package fiona
Package name: fiona
Version : 1.5.0-1
Upstream Author : Sean Gillies
URL :
On 02/05/2015 10:33 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
It works for me in unstable. You will need a recent update of unstable
as fiona relies on python-cligj which was only added yesterday.
You don't need to have python-cligj installed locally to build the
package with pbuilder, you do need cython
Also fiona requires a recent version of Cython, so building under
jessie is not possible without further tweaking.
jessie sid have the same cython version, so it should work. The wheezy
version is not sufficient though.
Interesting. In that case it got a freeze exception. When I last
Hi Johan,
Thanks for your work on fiona and related packages!
Some comments regarding the package based on my review.
lintian reported two issues with the copyright file, both having the
same cause:
I: fiona source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright
docs/data/tests/data/* (paragraph
Le 05/02/2015 10:50, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda a écrit :
El Dijous, 5 de febrer de 2015, a les 10:24:25, Corentin Desfarges va
escriure:
Are you sure that in build time do you need to download some data? is this
acceptable?
Leopold
Yes I need to download the data, else the unit tests can't
El Dijous, 5 de febrer de 2015, a les 10:24:25, Corentin Desfarges va
escriure:
Are you sure that in build time do you need to download some data? is this
acceptable?
Leopold
Yes I need to download the data, else the unit tests can't pass... And I
can't include the data into the
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Corentin Desfarges wrote:
I have a simple question : Is there a way to keep the files got with the
command pdebuild when we launch a new build with pdebuild, to save time
when we work on very big packages which last hours ?
I would add a pair of identical hook
Are you sure that in build time do you need to download some data? is this
acceptable?
Leopold
Yes I need to download the data, else the unit tests can't pass... And I can't
include the data into the package, because of its the size (more than 800MB).
It has already been discussed in this
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:50:15AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
By the way, we have to add wget as build-deps of the package in d/control.
No, it's the lack of wget as build dependency. I'm trying to build again the
package. I have made some modifications, but I would like
Thank you for advise, Russ Allbery and Paul Wise.
I'll try it later :)
--
Regards,
C.D.Luminate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Your message dated Thu, 05 Feb 2015 18:36:55 +
with message-id e1yjrin-0003ui...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: abraca/0.8.0+dfsg-1 -- Simple and powerful
graphical client for XMMS2
has caused the Debian Bug report #761687,
regarding RFS: abraca/0.8.0+dfsg-1 -- Simple and
Your message dated Thu, 05 Feb 2015 18:36:59 +
with message-id e1yjrir-0003ua...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: josm-plugins/0.0.svn30932+ds1-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #776795,
regarding RFS: josm-plugins/0.0.svn30932+ds1-1~exp1
to be marked as done.
This means
On 02/05/2015 06:39 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
[...] I'll leave it at this.
Famous last words. There is just one more thing.
The doc-base control file has an unusual suffix:
.docbase instead of .doc-base.
It also uses an unusual Document ID: fiona.docbase, using the (source)
package name
23 matches
Mail list logo
