Bug#785683: RFS: mod-gnutls/0.6-1.4 [NMU]

2015-05-18 Thread Thomas Klute
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I'm looking for a sponsor for a bugfix update of mod-gnutls that would close bug #775909 (segfaults with reverse proxy configuration). I've uploaded the package to Debian Mentors a few weeks ago. The maintainer has not responded (like

Re: RFS: self-serve photo booth software

2015-05-18 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Adam Roses Wight wrote: > I see it's not recommended to include a debian/ directory in my > upstream source control [1]. What's the best practice for hosting Debian > packaging files? Should I request a new repo on Alioth, fork my > upstream, and add the debian d

Re: RFS: self-serve photo booth software

2015-05-18 Thread Paul Wise
[I'm subscribed, no need to CC] On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Adam Roses Wight wrote: > I slogged through the gettext support, noticing too late that QT comes with > its own i18n library. If my ad-hoc gettext integration eventually > rabbitholes, > I might try that instead: > > http://www.cm

Bug#785514: RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC]

2015-05-18 Thread Vincent Cheng
Hi Gabriele, On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 08:41:02PM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: >> Hi Gabriele, > > Hi Vince, > >> About the re-licensing of php_ext/ming.c and php_ext/php_ming.h, does >> the relevant Github issue [1] mean

Re: RFS: self-serve photo booth software

2015-05-18 Thread Adam Roses Wight
I see it's not recommended to include a debian/ directory in my upstream source control [1]. What's the best practice for hosting Debian packaging files? Should I request a new repo on Alioth, fork my upstream, and add the debian dir on a branch? [2, 3] Also, is it standard procedure to upload l

Bug#785514: RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC]

2015-05-18 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 02:25 +0200, Gabriele Giacone wrote: > I guess unstable has been violating it since years then. And > snapshot.d.o will keep doing it even after next upload. Removed. Please file bugs about those things. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Descr

Bug#785514: RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC]

2015-05-18 Thread Gabriele Giacone
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Gabriele Giacone wrote: >> BTW getting rid of java extension would not be a problem > > Great, please do ASAP as you have made mentors.d.n violate the law. I guess unstable has been violating it since years then.

Bug#785514: RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC]

2015-05-18 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Gabriele Giacone wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:14:23PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: >> That appears to be a non-free license as there is no clause allowing >> distribution? Please remove ming from mentors until this is clarified >> as we don't have a license to dis

Bug#785514: RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC]

2015-05-18 Thread Gabriele Giacone
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:14:23PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Vincent Cheng wrote: > > > - java_ext/* doesn't seem to be licensed under LGPL-2.1+ as claimed by > > d/copyright, but under this license instead: > > > > This software is copyright 2001 E-Publishing Gro

Bug#785426: RFS: cv/0.6-1 [ITP] -- cv - Coreutils (progress) Viewer)

2015-05-18 Thread lumin
On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 17:18 +0200, Xfennec wrote: > Well, the best tip I can give is the following GitHut issue: > https://github.com/Xfennec/cv/issues/8 > > The summary of this is that I'm pleased with the current name, and > think the name conflict is quite unlikely, and is easy to deal with > s

Bug#785514: RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC]

2015-05-18 Thread Gabriele Giacone
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 08:41:02PM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: > Hi Gabriele, Hi Vince, > About the re-licensing of php_ext/ming.c and php_ext/php_ming.h, does > the relevant Github issue [1] mean that the re-licensing wasn't > actually ACK-ed by all the contributors of these files? This sounds >

Re: How to deal with configs in non-standard locations

2015-05-18 Thread Shawn Sörbom
Worked great! Thanks! On Monday, May 18, 2015 14:05:55 Vincent Cheng wrote: > Hi Shawn, > > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Shawn Sörbom wrote: > > Hi, > > I am playing with the Snes9x source code, and I can't get it to compile > > via > > debhelper. Snes9x has its config files in a subfolder o

Bug#784854: RFS: gtk3-engines-unico/1.0.3+14.04.20140109+repack1-1 [ITA] [RC]

2015-05-18 Thread Vincent Cheng
Control: owner -1 ! On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 9:04 AM, James Lu wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: important > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtk3-engines-unico". This upload > fixes an RC bug that caused GTK3 applications to crash with any theme that

Bug#784732: marked as done (RFS: liquidprompt/1.9-1 [ITP])

2015-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 18 May 2015 14:13:23 -0700 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#784732: RFS: liquidprompt/1.9-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #784732, regarding RFS: liquidprompt/1.9-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#783529: marked as done (RFS: spacenavd/0.6-1 [ITA])

2015-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 18 May 2015 14:02:46 -0700 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#783529: RFS: spacenavd/0.6-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #783529, regarding RFS: spacenavd/0.6-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Re: How to deal with configs in non-standard locations

2015-05-18 Thread Vincent Cheng
Hi Shawn, On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Shawn Sörbom wrote: > Hi, > I am playing with the Snes9x source code, and I can't get it to compile via > debhelper. Snes9x has its config files in a subfolder of the sources called > "unix". > What is the proper way of overriding dh_auto_install and dh_

How to deal with configs in non-standard locations

2015-05-18 Thread Shawn Sörbom
Hi, I am playing with the Snes9x source code, and I can't get it to compile via debhelper. Snes9x has its config files in a subfolder of the sources called "unix". What is the proper way of overriding dh_auto_install and dh_auto_build to point debhelper to the correct location? I have tried p

Bug#785426: RFS: cv/0.6-1 [ITP] -- cv - Coreutils (progress) Viewer)

2015-05-18 Thread Xfennec
lumin (18/05/2015 14:37) : > Hi guys, > > On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 14:24 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote: > > I'll give it a look shortly > > Thank you ;) > > > probably not that one, right? > > OMG, I missed that line ... > > > Additionally I noticed there's already a package > > shipping /usr/bin

Bug#785426: RFS: cv/0.6-1 [ITP] -- cv - Coreutils (progress) Viewer)

2015-05-18 Thread lumin
Hi guys, On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 14:24 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote: > I'll give it a look shortly Thank you ;) > probably not that one, right? OMG, I missed that line ... > Additionally I noticed there's already a package shipping /usr/bin/cv: > > > radiance: /usr/bin/cv > > maybe you can use

Bug#785426: RFS: cv/0.6-1 [ITP] -- cv - Coreutils (progress) Viewer)

2015-05-18 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! lumin writes: > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/cv I'll give it a look shortly > > More information about hello can be obtained from > http://www.example.com. probably not that one, right? Additi

Bug#784854: MIA for "Karolina Kalic "

2015-05-18 Thread Ana Guerrero Lopez
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:58:08AM +0200, Karolina Kalic wrote: > Hi everybody, > > As I can remember, MIA team contacted me a while ago. And I explained > that I can not continue my work for Debian at the moment. The packages > should have been orphaned properly after that. I don't know what > ha

Bug#783529: RFS: spacenavd/0.6-1 [ITA]

2015-05-18 Thread Rodolphe PELLOUX-PRAYER
Hi Vincent, Le 18/05/2015 05:01, Vincent Cheng a écrit : > […] > Looks good, except for one last thing I should've checked earlier > (sorry for these piecemeal reviews); your orig tarball doesn't seem to > match the tarball distributed upstream: > > upstream md5sum: 7e2c04fb8dbb7d39b9ee7b64565e0

Bug#784732: RFS: liquidprompt/1.9-1 [ITP]

2015-05-18 Thread Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
On 16 May 2015 at 10:25, Vincent Cheng wrote: > Control: tag -1 + moreinfo > Control: owner -1 ! > > Hi Arturo, > > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez > wrote: >> Package: sponsorship-requests >> Severity: wishlist >> >> Dear mentors, >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for my p

Bug#784854: MIA for "Karolina Kalic "

2015-05-18 Thread Karolina Kalic
Hi everybody, As I can remember, MIA team contacted me a while ago. And I explained that I can not continue my work for Debian at the moment. The packages should have been orphaned properly after that. I don't know what happened. I'm glad that someone wants to continue the work on unico. I don't h