Re: Making Debian package with multiple opensource package

2015-06-10 Thread Wookey
+++ dp [2015-06-07 19:35 -0700]: Hi Mentors, I am trying to create a .deb that has dependency on multiple opensource packages. These packages come from different sources . Few are available through apt-get, but few are on git clone or mirrored on personal websites. They have variety of

Re: Replacing roxterm's multiple binary packages with one

2015-06-10 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Tuesday 09 June 2015 17:22:30 Tony Houghton wrote: Depending on its size, it may be better to keep roxterm-common: this package is arch:all and this would avoid duplication these data for each arch. IIRC I was thinking of doing that a long time ago (before the GTK2/3 split) but was

Bug#776885: marked as done (RFS: manuel/1.8.0-1 [ITP] -- Python library for documented tests)

2015-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:24:30 +0200 with message-id 55783a8e.30...@danielstender.com and subject line RFS: manuel/1.8.0-1 [ITP] -- Python library for documented tests has caused the Debian Bug report #776885, regarding RFS: manuel/1.8.0-1 [ITP] -- Python library for documented

Re: Replacing roxterm's multiple binary packages with one

2015-06-10 Thread Tony Houghton
On 10/06/15 12:53, Dominique Dumont wrote: On Tuesday 09 June 2015 17:22:30 Tony Houghton wrote: Depending on its size, it may be better to keep roxterm-common: this package is arch:all and this would avoid duplication these data for each arch. IIRC I was thinking of doing that a long time ago

Bug#785715: marked as done (RFS: goobook/1.6-1 [ITP] -- command-line interface to Google contacts)

2015-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:06:10 +0300 with message-id 20150610140610.ge3...@gmail.com and subject line Bug#785715: RFS: goobook/1.6-1 [ITP] -- command-line interface to Google contacts has caused the Debian Bug report #785715, regarding RFS: goobook/1.6-1 [ITP] -- command-line

Bug#788375: marked as done (RFS: python-geopandas/0.1.1-1 [ITP])

2015-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:48:17 +0200 with message-id 5578a291.4060...@xs4all.nl and subject line RFS: python-geopandas/0.1.1-1 [ITP] [uploaded] has caused the Debian Bug report #788375, regarding RFS: python-geopandas/0.1.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#788375: RFS: python-geopandas/0.1.1-1 [ITP]

2015-06-10 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-geopandas Package name: python-geopandas Version : 0.1.1-1 Upstream Author : Kelsey Jordahl URL :

Bug#788385: RFS: fiona/1.5.1-1

2015-06-10 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package fiona Package name: fiona Version : 1.5.1-1 Upstream Author : Sean

Re: Replacing roxterm's multiple binary packages with one

2015-06-10 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 13:50:03 +0100, Tony Houghton wrote: I suppose the relative size of the existing dbg packages makes a strong case against including debugging symbols in the main package. If you want to get rid of the -dbg package you can probably do so without a bad conscience, since we'll

Bug#788385: RFS: fiona/1.5.1-1

2015-06-10 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Johan, Thanks for your work on this package too. On 06/10/2015 10:22 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: Package name: fiona Version : 1.5.1-1 The package cannot be built from git because the upstream pristine-tar branches have not been pushed. Please run `git push --all git push

Bug#788385: RFS: fiona/1.5.1-1 [uploaded]

2015-06-10 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 06/10/2015 10:54 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 06/10/2015 10:22 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: Package name: fiona Version : 1.5.1-1 The package cannot be built from git because the upstream pristine-tar branches have not been pushed. Please run `git push --all git

Bug#784898: I would be interested

2015-06-10 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
to see this package in Debian so I can provide review/sponsorship when time allows (hopefully in the next day or so). meanwhile: - make package really ready -- vcs fields should point to existing repository. Do you want to keep it under collab-maint? Then please join the team at

Bug#788407: RFS: chaoticrage/1.14-1 [ITP]

2015-06-10 Thread Josh Heidenreich
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package chaoticrage * Package name: chaoticrage Version : 1.14-1 Upstream Author : Josh Heidenreich josh.sickm...@gmail.com * URL : http://www.chaoticrage.com *

Bug#785514: closed by Bart Martens ba...@quantz.debian.org (closing RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC])

2015-06-10 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:19 AM, Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 08:24:12PM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: Control: owner -1 ! On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 04:30:10PM +, Debian Bug