Bug#787578: RFS: soci/3.2.3-1 [ITP] -- C++ Database Access Library

2015-06-15 Thread Tobias Frost
Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 pending Am Donnerstag, den 04.06.2015, 10:39 -0400 schrieb Bill Blough: On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 02:41:08PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: Quoting Bill Blough de...@blough.us: I suggest that you base your work on my repository. (link to the repository is

Bug#788824: RFS: sblim-wbemcli/1.6.3-1 (new upstream patchlevel release + minor touch-ups)

2015-06-15 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package sblim-wbemcli * Package name: sblim-wbemcli Version : 1.6.3-1 Upstream Author : Tyrel Datwyler tyr...@us.ibm.com * URL :

Bug#787578: marked as done (RFS: soci/3.2.3-1 [ITP] -- C++ Database Access Library)

2015-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:57:07 +0200 with message-id 1434365827.21711.12.ca...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#787578: RFS: soci/3.2.3-1 [ITP] -- C++ Database Access Library has caused the Debian Bug report #787578, regarding RFS: soci/3.2.3-1 [ITP] -- C++ Database Access

Bug#784854: RFS: gtk3-engines-unico/1.0.3+14.04.20140109+repack1-1 [ITA] [RC]

2015-06-15 Thread James Lu
Hi Vincent, Oops, I probably uploaded the wrong version. The get-orig-source target uses the date of the last debian/changelog entry to set timestamps, so I must've changed that without regenerating the tarball. Reuploaded, should be fixed now. Best, James On 14/06/2015 11:47 PM, Vincent

Bug#788844: RFS: gbutils/5.6.6-1 [ITP]

2015-06-15 Thread Pietro Battiston
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gbutils * Package name: gbutils Version : 5.6.6-1 Upstream Author : Giulio Bottazzi * URL : http://cafed.sssup.it/software/gbutils/gbutils.html * License

Re: dh --buildsystem=none?

2015-06-15 Thread Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
On 15 June 2015 at 16:34, Ole Streicher oleb...@debian.org wrote: Hi, I have a package that needs no build, but just the installation of the (script) files. All installation is done via debian/install, debian/docs, debian/examples. So, the debian/rules file is simple ---8--

Bug#788850: RFS: python-cligj/0.2.0-1

2015-06-15 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-cligj Package name: python-cligj Version : 0.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Sean Gillies URL :

dh --buildsystem=none?

2015-06-15 Thread Ole Streicher
Hi, I have a package that needs no build, but just the installation of the (script) files. All installation is done via debian/install, debian/docs, debian/examples. So, the debian/rules file is simple ---8-- #!/usr/bin/make -f %: dh $@ ---8-- However, for some

Bug#788850: marked as done (RFS: python-cligj/0.2.0-1)

2015-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jun 2015 04:25:33 + with message-id e1z4irj-0007uw...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: python-cligj/0.2.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #788850, regarding RFS: python-cligj/0.2.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#788850: RFS: python-cligj/0.2.0-1 [uploaded]

2015-06-15 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Johan, Thanks for your work on this package. On 06/15/2015 05:20 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-cligj I've sponsored the upload, and since it was a straightforward new upstream release I have not further comments. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG

Re: dh --buildsystem=none?

2015-06-15 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 04:34:04PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: So, the debian/rules file is simple ---8-- #!/usr/bin/make -f %: dh $@ ---8-- However, for some reason dh tries to run configure etc., which ofcourse fails. How can I explicitely specify a build

Re: Creating a package with plugins and libs

2015-06-15 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: and propose what? Sounds like the only thing they need to do is to install them into the right path: /usr/lib/$PACKAGE/plugins/ Maybe they even already have a configure option for that? -- bye, pabs

Re: Creating a package with plugins and libs

2015-06-15 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dilluns, 15 de juny de 2015, a les 16:27:20, Paul Wise va escriure: On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: and propose what? Sounds like the only thing they need to do is to install them into the right path: /usr/lib/$PACKAGE/plugins/ Maybe they even

Bug#784854: RFS: gtk3-engines-unico/1.0.3+14.04.20140109+repack1-1 [ITA] [RC]

2015-06-15 Thread Vincent Cheng
Hi James, On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:55 PM, James Lu glol...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Vincent, Wow, that's a lot of magic for one makefile target! I followed the guide, setting the file timestamps to the last changelog entry's date, and it works fine now. I've uploaded the newest version to

Re: Creating a package with plugins and libs

2015-06-15 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dilluns, 15 de juny de 2015, a les 12:08:58, Paul Wise va escriure: On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: The question is that the package creates a few libraries in /usr/lib and a bunch of small libraries (used as plugins but treated libraries by upstream

Re: Restructuring roxterm packaging (was Replacing roxterm's multiple binary packages with one)

2015-06-15 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote: On 09/06/15 14:04, Dominique Dumont wrote: On Monday 08 June 2015 16:54:53 Tony Houghton wrote: roxterm-common (data files, roxterm-gtk2 and roxterm-gtk3 depend on it) roxterm-gtk2, roxterm-gtk3 (binaries)

Bug#788218: marked as done (RFS: ustr/1.0.4-5)

2015-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Jun 2015 00:22:05 -0700 with message-id CACZd_tCcTM0Ln8NhNodqH_RmWkQDzU8vMnbxpR=v-jo_xqu...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: Bug#788218: RFS: ustr/1.0.4-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #788218, regarding RFS: ustr/1.0.4-5 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#787223: RFS: vbam/1.8.0.1498-1

2015-06-15 Thread Sérgio Benjamim
Hi! general * Have you considered maintaining the package as part of the Debian Games team? * Have you contacted Etienne Millon ? He may be interested in this (as the maintainer of the vba package). I just tried on #debian-games, I will contacted Millon. d/control: * Why are there 2