Bug#790726: RFS: stx-btree/0.9-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package stx-btree * Package name: stx-btree Version : 0.9-2 Upstream Author : Timo Bingmann (Mail: tb a-with-circle idlebox dot net) * URL :

Bug#790771: why closed ?

On 01/07/15 17:27, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the sponsorship-requests package: #790771: RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS library It has been closed by Bart Martens ba...@quantz.debian.org. Their

Bug#790771: RFS: clblas/2.4-2 -- OpenCL BLAS library

Hello Ghislain, please upload to mentors then I will upload :) wrong url in the next message ;) De : Ghislain Vaillant [ghisv...@gmail.com] Envoyé : mercredi 1 juillet 2015 18:09 À : sub...@bugs.debian.org Objet : Bug#790771: RFS: clblas/2.4-2 -- OpenCL

Bug#777586: marked as done (RFS: crosswalk/11.40.277.2-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jul 2015 16:24:42 + with message-id e1zakou-0001kh...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: crosswalk/11.40.277.2-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #777586, regarding RFS: crosswalk/11.40.277.2-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#790771: why closed ?

look at the title ;) RFS for the 2.4-1 version :) no worry upload to mentors en I will take care of the sponsoring. Cheers Fred #790771: RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS library -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:02:59AM +0200, David Douard wrote: Version : 0.12.0-1 I think the common practice is to bump the version after a ftp-team reject. * remove buildout related files from the source package As your orig tarball differs from the upstream repo (and the repo found

Bug#790785: RFS: linop/0.8.2-3

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package linop * Package name: linop Version : 0.8.2-3 Upstream Author : Ghislain Vaillant ghisv...@gmail.com * URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/linop * License :

Re: How or if daemon users should be removed

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:07:29PM -0700, Cameron Norman wrote: I have a package (apt-p2p) that I want to adopt that removes its daemon with deluser in postrm (on purge). This causes issues (piuparts complains) because deluser is not essential and dependent packages are not guaranteed to be

Re: Bug#778007: mira: ftbfs with GCC-5

* Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu, 2015-07-01, 09:32: ../mira/libmira.a(assembly_io.o): In function `boost::re_detail::perl_matcher__gnu_cxx::__normal_iteratorchar const*, std::__cxx11::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar ,

Re: How or if daemon users should be removed

* Cameron Norman camerontnor...@gmail.com, 2015-06-30, 14:07: I have a package (apt-p2p) that I want to adopt that removes its daemon with deluser in postrm (on purge). This causes issues (piuparts complains) because deluser is not essential and dependent packages are not guaranteed to be

Bug#790761: RFS: mysql-sandbox/3.0.50-1 ITP #554155

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mysql-sandbox Package name: mysql-sandbox Version : 3.0.50-1 Upstream Author : Giuseppe Maxia g...@cpan.org URL : http://mysqlsandbox.net/ License :

Bug#790797: RFS: pyzolib/0.3.3-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package pyzolib * Package name: pyzolib Version : 0.3.3-2 Upstream Author : Almar Klein almar.kl...@gmail.com * URL : https://bitbucket.org/pyzo/pyzolib * License :

Bug#790771: why closed ?

On 01/07/15 17:51, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: look at the title ;) RFS for the 2.4-1 version :) no worry upload to mentors en I will take care of the sponsoring. Cheers Fred #790771: RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS library Sure, because: *Changed Bug title to 'RFS: clblas/2.4-1 --

Bug#790771: Uploaded to mentors

Hi Fred, clblas/2.4-2 is now available on mentors. It includes the reproducibility fix submitted by Maria and the improvement you suggested in the previous RFS. Thanks for your sponsorship. Ghis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#790391: marked as done (RFS: bomberclone/0.11.9-5 ITA)

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jul 2015 19:45:34 +0200 with message-id 5594273e.1060...@spiessknafl.at and subject line Re: Bug#790391: RFS: bomberclone/0.11.9-5 ITA has caused the Debian Bug report #790391, regarding RFS: bomberclone/0.11.9-5 ITA to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#790771: marked as done (RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS library)

Your message dated Wed, 01 Jul 2015 16:24:41 + with message-id e1zakot-0001kx...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS library has caused the Debian Bug report #790771, regarding RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS library to be marked as done. This means

Bug#790771: why closed ?

On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 05:54:01PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: Please, avoid sending email in HTML. On 01/07/15 17:51, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: look at the title ;) RFS for the 2.4-1 version :) no worry upload to mentors en I will take care of the sponsoring. Cheers Fred

Bug#790771: why closed ?

Hi Mattia On 01/07/15 18:21, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 05:54:01PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: Please, avoid sending email in HTML. My bad. On 01/07/15 17:51, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: look at the title ;) RFS for the 2.4-1 version :) no worry upload to

Bug#790771: RFS: clblas/2.4-2 -- OpenCL BLAS library

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package clblas * Package name: clblas Version : 2.4-2 Upstream Author : Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. * URL : https://github.com/clMathLibraries/clBLAS * License

Re: Bug#778007: mira: ftbfs with GCC-5

Hi, I tried to track down this problem but picked the latest upstream version to see whether something regarding gcc-5 was done. In fact the reported problem vanished and was replaced by a new one which I also can't solve. Any help to track down the problem (see attachment) for the packaging in

Bug#790237: marked as done (RFS: netpipes/4.2-8 [RC] -- avoid FTBFS with gcc-5.)

Your message dated Thu, 02 Jul 2015 04:26:01 + with message-id e1zaw4x-0001xx...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: netpipes/4.2-8 [RC] -- avoid FTBFS with gcc-5. has caused the Debian Bug report #790237, regarding RFS: netpipes/4.2-8 [RC] -- avoid FTBFS with gcc-5. to be marked

Bug#790793: RFS: python-bitstring/3.1.3-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-bitstring * Package name: python-bitstring Version : 3.1.3-2 Upstream Author : Scott Griffiths sc...@griffiths.name * URL :

Bug#790791: RFS: ismrmrd/1.2.3-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ismrmrd * Package name: ismrmrd Version : 1.2.3-1 Upstream Author : The ISMRMRD developers * URL : http://ismrmrd.github.io/ * License : Expat Section

Bug#790816: RFS: roxterm/3.0.1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm * Package name: roxterm Version : 3.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk * URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net * License :