Your message dated Sun, 12 Jul 2015 22:19:41 -0700
with message-id
CACZd_tCBJZtsRa3L6BQ_ic+sa=drzsxtgts2tnvefbrdeh8...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: Bug#792200: RFS: roxterm/3.0.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #792200,
regarding RFS: roxterm/3.0.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jul 2015 22:25:37 -0700
with message-id
CACZd_tDk32fti=bmk0vkyu7pivhwsvmdr2qtyhu44nwtjpt...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: Bug#791813: RFS: ipband/0.8.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #791813,
regarding RFS: ipband/0.8.1-4
to be marked as done.
This means that
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
I am looking for a sponsor for my package cuba
* Package name: cuba
Version : 3.0+2024-3
Upstream Author : Thomas Hahn h...@feynarts.de
* URL : http://www.feynarts.de/cuba/
* License : LGPL-3+
Section
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
By Murphy's Law (or is it Sod's Law) I found quite a serious bug in
roxterm a day or two after the last release, so I've uploaded a new
version which needs sponsoring. TIA.
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.0.2-1
On 11/07/15 00:37, Pietro Battiston wrote:
Hi Tomasz,
thank you very much for your careful review.
Il giorno mar, 30/06/2015 alle 13.58 +0200, Tomasz Buchert ha scritto:
On 30/06/15 12:35, Pietro Battiston wrote:
[...]
Hi,
here are a few notes:
* you install manpages 2
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015, Daniel Stender wrote:
The state of the package is: I'm not sure if it's o.k. for it to get accepted
into the archive when a DFSG compliant change of the license is declared for
the project but the actual file headers state something different.
For that I've added a patch
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jul 2015 16:26:53 +
with message-id e1zek5d-0005ze...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS:
beret/1.2.1+git4e2f21bf4eeabfd137b2b846756a368b42456675-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #776120,
regarding RFS:
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
A portion of utils.c (starting from line 176) seems to originate from
glibc and is thus copyrighted by the FSF; this should be mentioned in
d/copyright. You may also want to consider updating d/copyright to use
DEP-5 [1] while you're at it.
In fact I found
One more thing:
| Optional dependencies:
|
| Gnu Scientific Library (GSL)found
| GNU matheval librarynot found
| zlib general purpose compression libraryfound
| help2man automatic man pages generator found
Is matheval uninstalled
9 matches
Mail list logo
