Re: next step in contributing to Debian

❦ 31 juillet 2015 18:42 -0400, Nicholas Steeves  : > https://readme.phys.ethz.ch/documentation/debian_version_numbers/ > > So for xserver-xorg-video-savage_2.3.8-1, backported to jessie, the > version would be: > > xserver-xorg-video-savage_2.3.8-1.1~bpo8+1 > > rather than > > xserver-xorg-video-

Bug#794187: RFS: progress/0.8-1 [ITP] (it is formerly known as 'cv'))

Control: retitle 794187 RFS: progress/0.8-1 [ITP] (it is formerly known as 'cv')) Dear mentors, I'v fixed lintian warning after the last time upload to mentors. Now package progress_0.8-1 is lintian clean. I am looking for a sponsor for my package "progress" * Package name: progress

RE: next step in contributing to Debian

Ah, I just found: https://readme.phys.ethz.ch/documentation/debian_version_numbers/ So for xserver-xorg-video-savage_2.3.8-1, backported to jessie, the version would be: xserver-xorg-video-savage_2.3.8-1.1~bpo8+1 rather than xserver-xorg-video-savage_2.3.8-1+nmu1~bpo8+1 ? Thanks, Nicholas

Re: Dropping debian/ directory vs Continuous Integration / daily-debs

Hi Danny! * Danny Edel , 2015-07-31, 22:51: I wanted to ask for an inclusion in debian, but the policy says that even if I'm upstream myself, I'm not supposed to have a debian/ directory at all. There is no such policy. debian/ in .orig.tar might be slightly annoying for the Debian maintain

Dropping debian/ directory vs Continuous Integration / daily-debs

Dear Debian mentors, I hope this is the right place to ask this kind of question. If it's not, a pointer in the right direction would be much appreciated. I have programmed a software called [dspdfviewer], and I feel its reasonably stable and usable (it is acquiring a growing userbase, judging f

next step in contributing to Debian

Hi, I've finally gotten comfortable with pbuilder (for both i386 and amd64), and have done a number of private backports (including Intel 2015Q2 graphics stack) and imports of Ubuntu packages that don't exist in Debian (eg: snapraid). Just the other day someone in #debian asked for a backpor

Bug#781465: marked as done (RFS: darkhttpd/1.11-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:24:44 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: darkhttpd/1.11-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #781465, regarding RFS: darkhttpd/1.11-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#793350: marked as done (RFS: czmq/3.0.2-1 ITP: 630761)

Your message dated Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:24:44 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: czmq/3.0.2-1 ITP: 630761 has caused the Debian Bug report #793350, regarding RFS: czmq/3.0.2-1 ITP: 630761 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#794086: RFS: clblas/2.4-3

idem 2.6 is out and can you fix most of the lintian warnings :) Cheers. Fred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/a2a20ec3b8560d408356cac2fc148e53b2f42.

Bug#794089: RFS: clfft/2.4-4

Hello, sorry but I am in VAC until mid August. can you find another sponsor or wait until I come back from holidays ? the 2.6 version is also available :p Cheers Fred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas.