Control: owner -1 !
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi Tony,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote:
On 12/08/15 19:39, Tony Houghton wrote:
Oops, please wait until I change it to 3.1.4-1. I overlooked the appdata
file in #795217. It contains some outdated content
Hi Vincent,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org wrote:
❦ 12 août 2015 20:16 +0100, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk :
Oops, please wait until I change it to 3.1.4-1. I overlooked the appdata
file in #795217. It contains some outdated content so I need to change
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package pkwalify
* Package name: pkwalify
Version : 1.22
Upstream Author : Slaven Rezic sla...@rezic.de
* URL : https://github.com/eserte/p5-Kwalify/
* License :
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Peter
some comments
1) d/changelog:
sndio (0.0.10-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
(feel free to spot the error :) )
2) d/rules:
I would prefer to run dh_auto_configure -- instead of ./configure
but it should be the same...
(actually dh_auto_configure fails, because it adds
Hi Victor,
some spurious commenting
(not a perl user, so I can't help in sponsoring)
d/control: debhelper =9 might be better
perl, perl (= 5.13.11) | libtest-simple-perl (= 0.98)
seems hacky, but I understand simple-perl might be needed only for older perl
releases
(note: I'm not sure
For perl arch:all packages there are no relevant changes between
debhelper compat level 8 and 9.
But yes, it at least makes lintian (with its new pedantic warning)
happy.
exactly :)
That's perfectly fine, is used all over the place in perl packages
and works.
so my guess was true,
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:09:26 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
d/control: debhelper =9 might be better
For perl arch:all packages there are no relevant changes between
debhelper compat level 8 and 9.
But yes, it at least makes lintian (with its new pedantic warning)
happy.
perl, perl (=
Hi Zhou,
General Note: I don't think I'll sponsor this package without a discussion on
debian-devel mail list,
because I do not honestly think we need another package management, specially
because
mixing stuff might lead to libraries incompatibilities, and something more.
Do you install
Hi mentors,
I have some problem with automake configuration to link library
symbols properly.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:31:02AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 13/08/15 10:44, Andreas Tille wrote:
However, from your mail it seems that there is some issue with libmuscle
which I do not
On 13/08/15 15:06, Andreas Tille wrote:
+libMems_la_LIBADD = $(DEPS_LIBS) @BOOST_FILESYSTEM_LIB@
@BOOST_IOSTREAMS_LIB@ @BOOST_SYSTEM_LIB@
+
SUBDIRS = libMems
Move this from /Makefile.am into /libMems/Makefile.am, where libMems.la
is built and the rest of the libMems_la_WHATEVER variables
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for filezilla 3.12.0.2-1.
The package is maintained in collab-main/git:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/filezilla.git
Changes since the last upload:
filezilla (3.12.0.2-1) unstable;
A new package is now available on mentors at the same location.
Your message dated Thu, 13 Aug 2015 21:09:13 -0700
with message-id
CACZd_tAtMumqdGdinGrbvwuYtkV0viiWWwMAs=tksy7-hf1...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: Bug#795423: RFS: filezilla/3.12.0.2-1 -- Full-featured
graphical FTP/FTPS/SFTP client
has caused the Debian Bug report #795423,
regarding
1) d/changelog:
sndio (0.0.10-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
(feel free to spot the error :) )
Interesting, I had thought that was supposed to be changed only right before the
real upload. Next will be for unstable, anyhow.
2) d/rules:
I would prefer to run dh_auto_configure -- instead of
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 03:40:21PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 13/08/15 15:06, Andreas Tille wrote:
+libMems_la_LIBADD = $(DEPS_LIBS) @BOOST_FILESYSTEM_LIB@
@BOOST_IOSTREAMS_LIB@ @BOOST_SYSTEM_LIB@
+
SUBDIRS = libMems
Move this from /Makefile.am into /libMems/Makefile.am, where
15 matches
Mail list logo
