Hi
the issue comes from patch: add-license-info.patch
The patch is patching author's source files with author's original
copyright declaration in the global LICENSE file and the one
in head of progress.c . The patch was sent to author days ago
and we (Asias and me) are waiting for author to
Hi, Gianfranco!
I fixed all the other warnings, but still have 3 that I don't really
know how to handle:
W debian-watch-file-in-native-package
* You asked me to add a watch file, but I created a native package.
Should I remove the file?
W native-package-with-dash-version
* I can't change
Hi
W debian-watch-file-in-native-package* You asked me to add a watch file, but
I created a native
package. Should I remove the file?
why? don't you have an orig tarball to start from?
http://opensips.org/pub/opensips/latest/src/
just use quilt source format, and make the vcs point to
Hello Forum:
I recently got the right to access to some Debian porter machines.
Now I want to connect to them via SSH. I guess that some SSH key
must be deposited somewhere: any idea ?
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
On 19-08-15 13:38, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello Forum:
I recently got the right to access to some Debian porter machines.
Now I want to connect to them via SSH. I guess that some SSH key
must be deposited somewhere: any idea ?
You can change your SSH key via the LDAP mail gateway:
Part of
Control: owner -1 !
Lets review:
1) debian/changelog should only contain one entry.
Initial release (Closes: #ITPBUG)
2) debian/control: debhelper =9 is recommended
3) d/control: python-pyinotify, python-boto, python-dateutil, python-argparse
they are all listed in setup.py install_requires
Hello guys,
I worked in opensis packaging sometime ago, may be this would be useful:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-voip/opensips/trunk/debian/
or just check out the repository:
svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-voip/opensips/trunk/
Check carefully the copyright, when I checked the source code I
Hi Lumin,
I have just uploaded a updated package to mentors several seconds ago,
and I will CC you later in the d-devel discussion.
thanks but I already follow -devel :)
If I don't write them in dch, even I will forget what I've done to
the package months later.
Policy chapter 4.4 said so:
Dear mentors,
We are looking for a sponsor for a couple of packages submited by Frederic
Bonnard
kimchi (bug # 772823 http://bugs.debian.org/772823)
sphde (bug #787491 http://bugs.debian.org/787491)
Lets review:
1) debian/changelog should only contain one entry.
Done.
2) debian/control: debhelper =9 is recommended
Done.
3) d/control: python-pyinotify, python-boto, python-dateutil,
python-argparse
Removed and verified that these deps are still included in the binary's
metadata with
Hi Stephen,
(1) debian/control:
---
- Concerning git (= 1.8.0): The version in jessie-backports is
2.1, so anyway this condition will be verified in case of a
backport to stable. This condition would also be verified in case
of a backport to oldstable
Hi Jeremy,
I've started by branching upstream and getting the scripts to pass 2to3,
but those are breaking changes... I'm not exactly sure how I'd include
these in the package while still maintaining compatibility with Python
2.
you can run 2to3 or 3to2 (both available on Debian) during build
Hi, Gianfranco!
I uploaded the latest version and it seems there are no other warnings.
I changed the format of the archive to be non-native updated some of the
files and everything seems ok now.
@Julian: thanks for checking this too. I am aware there were some issues
regarding the
Hi,
I didn't have time for a complete review, but two things needs to be fixed:
some copyrights are missing, ISL and some BSD2 IIRC
(I did a licensecheck * -r)
changelog should have one single entry with initial upload closes blah or
whatever, and the target suite should be unstable, not
Kimiki review:
please fix all the above (message #72 of bug 772823)
d/changelog: no need to put your name into []
when you are the only one who worked on the package (and the signature
is your)
d/rules: as said skipping tests is usually bad, please enable them if possible
d/copyright:
sphde:
d/changelog: please set to unstable the target series
d/control: what about having the doxygen documentation in a -doc package
arch=all with doxygen moved to build-depends-indep?
look e.g.
https://sources.debian.net/src/websocketpp/0.6.0-1/debian/control/
and the rules file
(note, you
BTW I would like to have a rules file with plain dh_ calls, can you please
try to use the rules file from julian's svn?
you can compare the output of two builds with debdiff if needed, I would really
appreciate the move
(actually it should simplify the packaging, and makes two lintian warnings
Hi there,
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 at 22:21:21 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
In general, I'd find sponsoring this NMU much easier if the package
split and the fixing of those many bugs could happen in separate
uploads. Each part is complex and the fallout is hard to estimate. I
understand that such
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 14:18:54 +0200 Vincent Blut
vincent.deb...@free.fr wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package chrony
* Package name: chrony
Version : 1.31.1-1
Upstream Author : Miroslav Lichvar
For something as one week, the current GIT version at Aliot works great on my
box.
(even if the option -u doent work).
On 20/08/15 00:18, Vincent Blut wrote:
Le mer. 19 août 2015 à 22:23, Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org a écrit :
control: owner -1 !
On 19-08-15 21:29, Vincent Blut wrote:
So,
On 20/08/15 00:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 19-08-15 23:30, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 19/08/15 14:02, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 19-08-15 13:38, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
I recently got the right to access to some Debian porter machines.
Now I want to connect to them via SSH. I guess
control: owner -1 !
On 19-08-15 21:29, Vincent Blut wrote:
So, nobody’s interested to see chrony updated ? ;-)
I will look at it soon.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Le mer. 19 août 2015 à 22:23, Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org a
écrit :
control: owner -1 !
On 19-08-15 21:29, Vincent Blut wrote:
So, nobody’s interested to see chrony updated ? ;-)
I will look at it soon.
Paul
Great, thanks Paul.
Hi:
Thanks Bas !
On 19/08/15 14:02, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 19-08-15 13:38, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello Forum:
I recently got the right to access to some Debian porter machines.
Now I want to connect to them via SSH. I guess that some SSH key
must be deposited somewhere: any idea ?
On 19-08-15 23:30, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
On 19/08/15 14:02, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 19-08-15 13:38, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
I recently got the right to access to some Debian porter machines.
Now I want to connect to them via SSH. I guess that some SSH key
must be deposited somewhere: any
Ok, I used dcut
dcut -k 4696e015 rm clblas_2.6-2_amd64.changes
in order to remove the offending file
Cheers
Fred
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package clfft
* Package name: clfft
Version : 2.6.1-2
Upstream Author : Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
* URL : https://github.com/clMathLibraries/clFFT
* License :
I'll take care of this one then I need to leave so if you come with clblas
after do not hesitate to ask Andreas.
Cheers
Fred
De : Ghislain Vaillant [ghisv...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 19 août 2015 11:15
À : sub...@bugs.debian.org
Objet : Bug#796079:
Dear all,
Just to report that d-sicience-maintainers [1] keeps receiving email
about an upload (clblas/2.6-2) which has been accepted already.
Can anyone who has access have a look and kill whatever process is
responsible for this.
[1]
29 matches
Mail list logo
