Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Hi Gianfranco,
> I would appreciate a changelog like this:
>
> dblatex (0.3.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
> …
Adapted and uploaded as 0.3.7-1 again:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dblatex/dblatex_0.3.7-1.dsc
Regards, Andreas
--
Andreas Hoenen
GPG: 102
Hi Alessio,
I wonder how you do that. Do you re-open before you re-close the bug?
Does sending "fixed " have the same effect?
2015-08-28 1:40 GMT+08:00, Alessio Treglia :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Alex Vong wrote:
>> What should I do if I forget to add pseudo-header such as
>>
On 08/27/2015 01:20 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
I know how to handle plugins in general, the question was "where I should
click?"
To add a plugin you right click on the panel and select the "panel ->
add new items" option, then choose the panel plugin from the window
which pops up.
1
You Bug is a ITP, ITA .. etc …. ?
Read this [1]
[1] https://mentors.debian.net/sponsors/rfs-howto
[]`s
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Your message dated Thu, 27 Aug 2015 22:56:35 +0200
with message-id <20150827205635.GA11156@macbookair>
and subject line Was uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #786764,
regarding RFS: python-spur/0.3.14-1 [ITP] -- Run commands easily over SSH
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Hi Vincent,
On 24-08-15 23:52, Vincent Blut wrote:
Which file do you have in common with ntp? Please re-read ¹.
>>>
>>> I guess I’ve been misled by § 7.6.2! The previous section shows the
>>> usage of the 'replaces:' field for packages providing *files* already
>>> provided by another pac
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Alex Vong wrote:
> What should I do if I forget to add pseudo-header such as
>
> Package:
> Version:
>
> when closing a bug?
> Should I manaully send something to cont...@bugs.debian.org to achieve
> the same effect?
I have found myself in the same situatio
Alright, I will revert it then. It is good to learn using the BTS
control server.
2015-08-27 23:24 GMT+08:00, Andrey Rahmatullin :
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:27:46PM +0800, Alex Vong wrote:
>> The bug I closed was actually `not a bug'
> Then you probably don't need to specify a version where it
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:27:46PM +0800, Alex Vong wrote:
> The bug I closed was actually `not a bug'
Then you probably don't need to specify a version where it was fixed.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi, I think you might want to fix the last two copyright issues
I unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright
paragraph at line 1366
paragraph at line 53
I wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright
cfg.tab.c (paragraph at line 53)
cfg.tab.h (paragraph at line 53)
(not blockers I guess, but nice to
Hi, all!
After several ping-pongs with Julian, we've finally managed to have a
candidate for upstream. I've uploaded the latests sources here:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/opensips/opensips_2.1.1-1.dsc
Best regards,
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Solutions
www.opensips-solutions.com
Both answers are yes. Thanks to all of you. The fix command works like
a charm. The bug I closed was actually `not a bug', the original
submitter said he didn't know how to close it.
About packaging, I am working on a new version based on the tarball
with build system submitted to upstream. I will
Your message dated Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:04:56 +0200
with message-id <55df1908.3000...@xs4all.nl>
and subject line RFS: sfcgal/1.1.0 [uploaded]
has caused the Debian Bug report #796998,
regarding RFS: sfcgal/1.1.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
* Alex Vong , 2015-08-27, 12:36:
What should I do if I forget to add pseudo-header such as
Package:
Version:
when closing a bug?
Do I understand correctly that you closed a bug, but without version
information?
You can mark a bug as fixed in the given version with the "fixed"
control co
Hi again,
>(hint: reassign)
your "Package" mentioning confused me, I guess
"fixed" is the correct hint.
but RTFM is the more complete answer :)
[1] https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
cheers!
G.
>Hi everyone,
>
>What should I do if I forget to add pseudo-header such as
>
>Package:
>Version:
>
>when closing a bug?
>Should I manaully send something to cont...@bugs.debian.org to achieve
>the same effect?
>Any example would be helpful.
Hi Alex,
does this page [1] helps you?
(hint: reass
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Jeroen,
>I am not sure what I could (or should) change with regards to the
>package to enable successful install of the whole xfce4 DE plus
>dependencies, or the configuration of the xfce session for the login
>manager. Wouldn't it be out of the scope of a panel plugin
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Matthew,
quick review:
1)
the license public-domain is in a non-english language.
Can you please ask upstream to translate it?
I'm not sure ftpmasters will enjoy it, neither I think
licenses should be translated in some non english language
(actually I don't think this c
18 matches
Mail list logo
