Hi Gianfranco,
2015-09-25 8:44 GMT-03:00 Gianfranco Costamagna :
> Control: owner -1 !
>
>
> Hi, lets review:
>
> changelog: please be more verbose: e.g bump std-version,
> -add patches
> -remove patches
> -refresh patches
> -drop README.source
>
>
>
> changelog:
> -shc (3.8.7-2) unstable; urgency
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Bill,
let me also take a look at xerces.
As usual, my unsorted list of observations:
- Please rebase your package to the latest version in Debian, to
include the NMU (3.1.1-5.1) from Salvatore Bonaccorso.
*.doc
- Don't install CREDITS and README.
d/control:
- (B-D)
Hi Bill,
Am Mittwoch, den 23.09.2015, 22:36 -0400 schrieb Bill Blough:
> Thanks so much for all the feedback.
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:03:01PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> >
> > - d/source/options: Why do you have the option diff-ignore?
>
> Issues with the translation files - When the .mo
* Frank Stähr , 2015-09-25, 18:11:
I am not yet looking for a sponsor, but going to program a tiny tool:
"setop" takes as inputs several lists/sets, calculates desired
(mathematical) set operations on them and outputs the final set (or
depending on operation resulting number of elements, answe
Hi Paul,
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 at 18:03:41 +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> The source package should not be a native source package as netmask
> isn't Debian specific.
It has however (to my surprise as well) been a native package since its
integration to Debian in 1999. Just made it non-native as you
su
I've just reuploaded the package with changes as follows:
- Added forward info in the harden.patch.
- Removed the leading tabs in d/rules. (I always forget it is not
allowed :p)
For the gcc warnings, I will investigate a bit and forward to upstream soon.
Thank you and best regards,
Andy
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 at 13:59:11 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>> Making people upset was certainly not my intention. And it's precisely
>> because I don't have upload rights that I didn't put my name in the
>> Uploaders fields. Anyway I don't care either way, so if it's less
>> controversia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi, can you please update to the latest upstream and fix the lintian
warnings?
thanks!
G.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWBXdZAAoJEPNPCXROn13Z6DQP/iAGXJNJMN5JukBlWtmzj6j6
5L5p34PsbLtLqKwxJDJFmpA5MDP0x5agNXV9UzBUKPYj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi, this is really too much for an NMU.
Did you test reverse dependencies?
you are bumping shlibs, so you need to be sure to have requested a
transition slot on release.debian.org (use reportbug against it to ask
one).
I would do rather a team upl
Hi, a quick googling returns me this link [1]
seems that python natively do some sort of this
python3
>>> a = set([3, 3, 2, 5, 1])
>>> a
{1, 2, 3, 5}
>>> b = set([5, 90, 2, 7])
>>> b
{90, 2, 5, 7}
>>> a | b
{1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 90}
>>> a & b
{2, 5}
>>>
[1]
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questio
Hello everybody,
I am not yet looking for a sponsor, but going to program a tiny tool:
"setop" takes as inputs several lists/sets, calculates desired
(mathematical) set operations on them and outputs the final set (or
depending on operation resulting number of elements, answer yes/no, …).
Fo
Hi, last nitpick/issues:
first a question: does the user need to do modprobe ktapvm manually?
2) the tarball is not the same as the upstream one.
Please consider packaging a snapshot
ktap_0.4+git20150925 and take the tarball from
https://github.com/REPO/PROJECT/tarball/master
or start from the
Hi
>I will try the help2man approach
this is a string I used recently for another package
help2man -N -n "enhanced HTTPS support for httplib and urllib2 using PyOpenSSL"
/usr/bin/ndg_httpclient --version-string=v0.4.0 > ndg_httpclient.1
>The code overrides the CPPFLAGS thus, not sure if I have
Hi Gianfranco
I don't know which remaining issues you are talking about...
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/eviacam/2.0.1-5/lintian
See below:
W: eviacam source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique (paragraph at line 68)
W: eviacam source: dep5-copyright-license-na
Hi again,
>Making people upset was certainly not my intention. And it's precisely
>because I don't have upload rights that I didn't put my name in the
>Uploaders fields. Anyway I don't care either way, so if it's less
>controversial to swap the addresses I'll do that.
I guess maintainer is a
Hi Sabniveesu,
>I was unaware of the other packager when I started working on this, weeks ago.
>Yesterday I contacted him and now eevrytyging is settled.
sorry for that, I tried to check if somebody else was working on it, and I
found he was the only one.
(one ITP that was inactive and some RFP
Hi! Thanks for your interest. And generally for your mentoring work :-)
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 at 12:11:54 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>> I don't mind either way :-) But why would you swap the addresses?
>> (Yes I read section 3.3 of the policy, it didn't help me
>> understanding.)
>
> fo
On Sep 25, 2015 3:22 AM, "Gianfranco Costamagna" <
costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it> wrote:
>
> I still don't get why you did upload the package.
>
> the package has been sponsored some days ago by me
>
> https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/variety_0.5.4-1.html
>
>
> and it is currently in debian new qu
Hi Guilhem
>
>I don't mind either way :-) But why would you swap the addresses? (Yes
>I read section 3.3 of the policy, it didn't help me understanding.)
for two reasons, don't make people upset, and because he is a DD :)
>GPL vs MIT is not my choice, as debian/initramfs/* was originally
>
Control: owner -1 !
Hi, lets review:
changelog: please be more verbose: e.g bump std-version,
-add patches
-remove patches
-refresh patches
-drop README.source
changelog:
-shc (3.8.7-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+shc (3.8.7-2) unstable; urgency=low
well your previous uploader uploaded with
Control: owner -1 !
Hi:
1) some licenses are missing.
e.g.
macosx/z*.h
win32/* so much stuff.
even if not used, I guess they should be mentioned because in the src packaging.
2) you seem to use both autotools-dev and autoreconf.
autoreconf should be a superset of the first, can you please
Your message dated Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:06:01 + (UTC)
with message-id <1144196327.1062597.1443175561451.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: mGBA package upload
has caused the Debian Bug report #799022,
regarding RFS: mgba/0.3.0-1 [ITP] -- Game Boy Advance emulator
to be marked as
Hi Cesar,
>I go on with the remaining issues.
I don't know which remaining issues you are talking about...
anyway I can find one for you:
rm ../eviacam_2.0.1.orig.tar.gz
uscan --debug --force-download
dpkg-buildpackage -S -sa
"dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to po/ar.gmo: binary
Hi Matthew,
it is fine to track the origin, but I would add a -origin suffix, to keep it in
sync with upstream
name, and to avoid collisions in case somebody else wants to package the fork
too.
Moreover lintian is showing a lot of warnings, can you please fix them?
sorry, but I lack of time to
I still don't get why you did upload the package.
the package has been sponsored some days ago by me
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/variety_0.5.4-1.html
and it is currently in debian new queue.
Your package on mentors can be just removed I guess.
cheers,
G.
Il Giovedì 24 Settembre 2
25 matches
Mail list logo
