Bug#799615: RFS: netmask/2.4.2-1 [ITA] - helps determine network masks

On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 at 11:21:29 +0200, Paul Wise wrote: > For the uscan OpenPGP support to work, upstream needs to release > tarballs (using make distcheck), upload detached OpenPGP signatures > and debian/watch needs to contain an pgpsigurlmangle= option. The > github releases feature can be used

Re: systemd service unit causing lintian init issues

Hi Tino, On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 3:41 AM, Tino Mettler wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 16:36:42 -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> I'm packaging up a firewall script that ships with a systemd service >> unit file. lintian is complaining about an init script:

RE:python-fabio circular dependency

> https://wiki.debian.org/PackageTransition I know about this wiki page (very valuable), but my case is not described in here. Cheers Fred

Re: python-fabio circular dependency

Hi, Does this page help you? https://wiki.debian.org/PackageTransition unfortunately I don't know how to best solve this issue cheers, Gianfranco

Re: python-fabio circular dependency

* PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel , 2015-09-28, 20:12: I want during the upgrade (python-fabio N) -> python-fabio N+1 to install also the fabio_viewer. this way the user has the same amount of services on it system. (python-fabio n contains also the

Re: systemd service unit causing lintian init issues

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:41:12 +0200, Tino Mettler wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 16:36:42 -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I'm packaging up a firewall script that ships with a systemd service > > unit file. lintian is complaining about an init script: > > > > % lintian

Bug#800403: marked as done (RFS: node-util-deprecate/1.0.1-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:52:05 + (UTC) with message-id <1427830434.3513303.1443523925915.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#800403: RFS: node-util-deprecate/1.0.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #800403, regarding RFS: node-util-deprecate/1.0.1-1

Re: systemd service unit causing lintian init issues

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 16:36:42 -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm packaging up a firewall script that ships with a systemd service > unit file. lintian is complaining about an init script: > > % lintian fw-skel_0.06-1_all.deb > W: fw-skel: init.d-script-not-marked-as-conffile

Bug#799615: RFS: netmask/2.4.2-1 [ITA] - helps determine network masks

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Guilhem Moulin wrote: > Moreover upstream has been super reactive on this one and has already > released a new version with some of the fixes you suggested, which also > allowed me to further simplify debian/rules. I just finished the > packaging and uploaded it

Re: systemd service unit causing lintian init issues

On 23 September 2015 at 23:36, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm packaging up a firewall script that ships with a systemd service > unit file. lintian is complaining about an init script: > Could please point to the complete source package? thanks. -- Arturo

How to determine when being packaged under Debian?

Hi Everyone, I work with the Crypto++ project. Debian carries the project and makes it available through the package https://packages.debian.org/source/libcrypto++. We have specific recommendations for packaging Crypto++ for distribution (cf., http://cryptopp.com/wiki/Config.h#Recommendations).

Re: "not-binnmuable-all-depends-any" problem exists for Multi-Arch: foreign, too?

On 09/29/2015 10:13 PM, Christoph Biedl wrote: > Jakub Wilk wrote... > >> * Christoph Biedl , 2015-09-29, >> 20:09: >>> A Source package builds two "Architecture: any" packages, one "Multi-Arch: >>> same", the other "Multi-Arch: foreign". The first has a

Re: How to determine when being packaged under Debian?

Jeffrey Walton writes: > We have specific recommendations for packaging Crypto++ for distribution > (cf., http://cryptopp.com/wiki/Config.h#Recommendations). Soon to be > released Crypto 5.6.3 introduces two new defines, and we feel distros > should enable them by default.

Re: systemd service unit causing lintian init issues

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 03:12:18PM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > A quick look at the source for dh_installinit doesn't show much about > the '-p', nor '--remaining' options. Can you elaborate or point to > further docs? FWIW those are common debhelper options and so found in debhelper(7). --

"not-binnmuable-all-depends-any" problem exists for Multi-Arch: foreign, too?

Hello, as there are still many surprises for me in the multiarch area, I preferred *not* to file a wishlist against lintian. I might be wrong with the following observation: A Source package builds two "Architecture: any" packages, one "Multi-Arch: same", the other "Multi-Arch: foreign". The

Re: "not-binnmuable-all-depends-any" problem exists for Multi-Arch: foreign, too?

* Christoph Biedl , 2015-09-29, 20:09: A Source package builds two "Architecture: any" packages, one "Multi-Arch: same", the other "Multi-Arch: foreign". The first has a strict versioned relationship on the second: | Package: ma_same | Architecture:

Re: systemd service unit causing lintian init issues

Niels Thykier: > [...] > Sorry, I somehow managed to confuse it with "--onlyscripts", which needs that treatment. Please ignore my previous mail. :) ~Niels

Re: "not-binnmuable-all-depends-any" problem exists for Multi-Arch: foreign, too?

Jakub Wilk wrote... > * Christoph Biedl , 2015-09-29, > 20:09: > >A Source package builds two "Architecture: any" packages, one "Multi-Arch: > >same", the other "Multi-Arch: foreign". The first has a strict versioned > >relationship on the second: > > >

Re: systemd service unit causing lintian init issues

Hi Niels, On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: [...] >> >> With a Build-Depends on dh-systemd. Those tweaks seemed to fix it. I >> also submitted a wishlist documentation bug: >> >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800043 >> >> Thanks! >> >>

Re: systemd service unit causing lintian init issues

Matt Zagrabelny: > Hi Tino, > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 3:41 AM, Tino Mettler wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 16:36:42 -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: >>> Greetings, >>> >>> I'm packaging up a firewall script that ships with a systemd service >>> unit file. lintian is