Re: How to accomodate test files that move after installation?

Hi Jeffrey, On 2015-09-30 14:17, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > Crypto++ has test files. When they are run from $PWD, them they work > fine. After installation into, say, /usr/share/, they break because > the location is an implicit dependency. So the two requirements are > self test must always run

Re: "not-binnmuable-all-depends-any" problem exists for Multi-Arch: foreign, too?

* Jens Reyer , 2015-09-30, 16:23: version+nmu (obsolete nmu variant, shouldn't be used today) I wouldn't call it obsolete. It is the recommended scheme for native packages. (For a few months in 2009, DevRef said that you should use +nmuN for all packages, but the

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

Hi Azat, >No problem, replaced version in d/changelog and d/NEWS to >"2.1-3+dfsg-1". wonderful >Done using d/copyright, thanks. this is not really correct. I see you remove Makefiles in copyright, but why? that files-excluded needs to be used for non dfsg files, not for autogenerated

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

Hi, >done. thanks for the hint. >Those lines are probably the result of some trials >that I forgot to cleanup :) > >I tidied up a bit the configuration.ac and Makefile.am files wonderful >The point of that commit was to add the debugging flags to the >compiler command line. > > if !

Bug#800600: RFS: arrayfire/3.1.2+dfsg1-2

control: owner -1 ! Hi, the packaging looks good, however I'm not sure about this [1] apt-get install libblas.so Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Package libblas.so is a virtual package provided by: libopenblas-dev 0.2.14-1 libblas-dev

Bug#800600: RFS: arrayfire/3.1.2+dfsg1-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arrayfire" * Package name: arrayfire Version : 3.1.2+dfsg1-2 Upstream Author : ArrayFire Development Group * URL : http://arrayfire.com/ * License : BSD

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

Hi Grigori, >By the way, I also uploaded python3-ck: >https://mentors.debian.net/package/python3-ck this is a nack for me. You can build two binaries with the same source package, look e.g. to https://sources.debian.net/src/python-esmre/0.3.1-3/ this includes: compat level --> 9 debhelper >=

Bug#788653: marked as done (RFS: ktap/0.4+git20150927-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux)

Your message dated Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:28:49 + (UTC) with message-id <1543860889.5505041.1443709729185.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux has caused the Debian Bug report #788653,

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Hi, I could own the bug no problem, just I would like to avoid stealing the package to Helmut! I did some new testing, and I'm really unsure about the upgrade procedure. I tried to install dropbear from jessie and then install the deb files. some issues: - dpkg shows that a default

Bug#800600: RFS: arrayfire/3.1.2+dfsg1-2

On 01/10/15 16:20, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: control: owner -1 ! Hi, the packaging looks good, however I'm not sure about this [1] apt-get install libblas.so Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Package libblas.so is a virtual package

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Hi, On Thu, 01 Oct 2015 at 17:53:21 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, I could own the bug no problem, just I would like to avoid > stealing the package to Helmut! Fair enough :-) > - dpkg shows that a default configuration file has changed, asking me how to > proceed This is because

Bug#800600: RFS: arrayfire/3.1.2+dfsg1-2

Hi, I'm really interested in examples from c.d.o :) not about this bug, but about some packages I comaintain that might have benefits from this! (sorry but I cant search from my phone...) cheers, G Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android From:"Ghislain Vaillant" Date:Thu, 1

Bug#800600: RFS: arrayfire/3.1.2+dfsg1-2

Quite a few examples here: https://codesearch.debian.net/perpackage-results/libblas-dev%20|%20libblas.so/2/page_0 Cheers, Ghis On 01/10/15 20:28, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Hi, I'm really interested in examples from c.d.o :) not about this bug, but about some packages I comaintain that