Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

2015-10-10 Thread Alex Vong
Hi everyone, I think Cesar has fixed almost all lintian warnings except the "too much arch independent data" warning, including the "keyword" keyword funny issue mentioned by Gianfranco. However, I see mainly 2 problems. First, if I try to build using debuild, I get the error `dh_autoreconf: autor

Bug#801444: RFS: node-bootstrap-tour/0.10.2+dfsg-1 [ITP bug #801443]

2015-10-10 Thread Julien Puydt
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-bootstrap-tour" * Package name: node-bootstrap-tour Version : 0.10.2+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Ulrich Sossou * URL : https://github.com/sorich87/bootstrap-to

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

2015-10-10 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
> >I think Cesar has fixed almost all lintian warnings except the "too >much arch independent data" warning, including the "keyword" keyword >funny issue mentioned by Gianfranco. However, I see mainly 2 problems. >First, if I try to build using debuild, I get the error >`dh_autoreconf: autoreconf

Bug#801444: RFS: node-bootstrap-tour/0.10.2+dfsg-1 [ITP bug #801443]

2015-10-10 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi grep MIT . -R returns some files, please update the copyright accordingly (if needed of course, but I leave checks to you :) ) the files were originally MIT licensed it seems, so please check if this still applies. cheers, G.

Bug#801449: RFS: node-isarray/0.0.1-1 [ITP]

2015-10-10 Thread Ross Gammon
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-isarray" * Package name: node-isarray Version : 0.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Julian Gruber (http://juliangruber.com) * URL : https://github.com/juliangruber/is

Bug#801444: RFS: node-bootstrap-tour/0.10.2+dfsg-1 [ITP bug #801443]

2015-10-10 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, Le samedi 10 oct. 2015 à 09:37:46 (+), Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > Control: owner -1 ! > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi > > grep MIT . -R > returns some files, please update the copyright accordingly > (if needed of course, but I leave checks to you :) ) > > the files were origi

Bug#801438: RFS: node-moment/2.10.6+dfsg-1 [ITP bug #759958 ]

2015-10-10 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Control: owner -1 ! Hi, as said on irc I would appreciate a look at this lintian pedantic warning: P: node-moment source: source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object locale/bo.js line length is 447 characters (>256) let me know how and if you want to look at it :) the package looks fine anyw

Bug#801449: RFS: node-isarray/0.0.1-1 [ITP]

2015-10-10 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Ross, the package is a little bit small indeed :) Do you have any written down sentence from an ftpmaster that the package will pass the new queue now? I don't want to reupload the package and get another rejection, I would like to read a state

Bug#801444: RFS: node-bootstrap-tour/0.10.2+dfsg-1 [ITP bug #801443]

2015-10-10 Thread Julien Puydt
Le samedi 10 oct. 2015 à 09:37:46 (+), Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > Control: owner -1 ! > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > grep MIT . -R > returns some files, please update the copyright accordingly > (if needed of course, but I leave checks to you :) ) > > the files were originally MIT lic

Bug#801449: RFS: node-isarray/0.0.1-1 [ITP]

2015-10-10 Thread Ross Gammon
Hi Gianfranco, On 10/10/2015 12:25 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Control: owner -1 ! > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi Ross, the package is a little bit small indeed :) > > Do you have any written down sentence from an ftpmaster that the package will > pass > the new queue now? > > I

Bug#801452: RFS: node-core-util-is/1.0.1-1 [ITP]

2015-10-10 Thread Ross Gammon
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-core-util-is" * Package name: node-core-util-is Version : 1.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Isaac Z. Schlueter * URL : https://github.com/isaacs/core-util-is * Lice

Bug#801449: RFS: node-isarray/0.0.1-1 [ITP]

2015-10-10 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Fine by me. Built&Signed&Uploaded on new queue, thanks for your contribution to Debian! cheers, G. Il Sabato 10 Ottobre 2015 12:51, Ross Gammon ha scritto: Hi Gianfranco, On 10/10/2015 12:25 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Control: owner -1 ! > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi Ros

Bug#801449: marked as done (RFS: node-isarray/0.0.1-1 [ITP])

2015-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2015 11:10:42 + (UTC) with message-id <170755636.1474107.175442978.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#801449: RFS: node-isarray/0.0.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #801449, regarding RFS: node-isarray/0.0.1-1 [ITP] to be marked

Bug#801452: marked as done (RFS: node-core-util-is/1.0.1-1 [ITP])

2015-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2015 11:20:55 + (UTC) with message-id <1197450288.2566755.176055973.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#801452: RFS: node-core-util-is/1.0.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #801452, regarding RFS: node-core-util-is/1.0.1-1 [ITP] to

Bug#801438: marked as done (RFS: node-moment/2.10.6+dfsg-1 [ITP bug #759958 ])

2015-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2015 11:36:44 + (UTC) with message-id <1872397774.2573400.177004679.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#801438: RFS: node-moment/2.10.6+dfsg-1 [ITP bug #759958 ] has caused the Debian Bug report #801438, regarding RFS: node-moment/2.10.6+d

Re: unstripped-static-library

2015-10-10 Thread hpfn
Hi Michael, > 02.10.2015 22:18, Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto (hpfn) wrote: > > Hi mentors, > > > > I maintain libgphoto2 and lintian now says > > that the package has "unstripped-static-library" > > (.a files). We (me and my mentor) believe that > > this message can be ignored. > > BTW, why do

Bug#798990: RFS: webdeploy/1.0-1 ITP #798716 -- deploy files via FTP

2015-10-10 Thread Daniel Bailey
Okay, I've update the upstream makefile and the rules file as per you suggestion except for the change to the pod2man command which removes the end of the line, that change would break the makefile. Is this is a mistake or is there something I have missed? Thanks, Dan. On 27/09/15 16:48, Gianfr

Bug#798990: RFS: webdeploy/1.0-1 ITP #798716 -- deploy files via FTP

2015-10-10 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
That was a (sfortunate) issue due to the line wrapping. so, now please use tab instead of spaces in the dh_auto_install target, set the distribution to unstable from UNRELEASED update your copyright to a more complete version (you can take example from there) https://sources.debian.net/src/de

Bug#798990: RFS: webdeploy/1.0-1 ITP #798716 -- deploy files via FTP

2015-10-10 Thread Daniel Bailey
On 10/10/15 19:06, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: That was a (sfortunate) issue due to the line wrapping. I thought it would be something like that so, now please use tab instead of spaces in the dh_auto_install target, Oops, my mistake, my editor converted the tab, I've fixed it now. set

Bug#798990: RFS: webdeploy/1.0-1 ITP #798716 -- deploy files via FTP

2015-10-10 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, nack :) gpl-3+ is different from GPL-3+ It might be a nitpick but I didn't find any other program with that syntax search on codesearch.debian.net GPL-3+ path:/copyright$ vs gpl-3+ path:/copyright$ cheers, G. Il Sabato 10 Ottobre 2015 20:45, Daniel Bailey ha scritto: On 10/10/15 19

Bug#798990: RFS: webdeploy/1.0-1 ITP #798716 -- deploy files via FTP

2015-10-10 Thread Daniel Bailey
Ah, okay, no problem. Fixed it. Dan. On 10/10/15 20:29, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Hi, nack :) gpl-3+ is different from GPL-3+ It might be a nitpick but I didn't find any other program with that syntax search on codesearch.debian.net GPL-3+ path:/copyright$ vs gpl-3+ path:/copyright$

Bug#801213: RFS: python-privacyidea/2.7-1 [ITP]

2015-10-10 Thread Daniel Stender
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Cornelius, I can't sponsor an upload of your work, but here are the results of my review of your package I was doing for my DD application process (I am CCing this email to the application manager and the archives for this purpose). Here are som

Bug#745126: RFS: passwordsafe/0.95.1+dfsg-1

2015-10-10 Thread Bill Blough
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:38:14PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > > Issues with the translation files - When the .mo files get generated, > > the .po files get updated with a new timestamp, causing repeat builds from > > the same source to fail the dpkg-source check. > > That's ugly and I guess sho

Bug#790104: RFS: lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

2015-10-10 Thread James Lu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Christian, Thanks for the thorough review! On Mon, 05 Oct 2015 22:47:21 +0200 Christian Kastner wrote: > d/control: > - The frontend for git at anonscm.d.o has been changed from gitweb to >git; please update Vcs-Browser URL accordingly >

Bug#790104: RFS: lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

2015-10-10 Thread James Lu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi everyone, (Hoping this is the right list for this) Recently I've been trying to get lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings into Debian, since it's a nifty utility! Right now, my packaging work has an RFS (request for sponsorship) bug at https://bugs.deb