Bug#784898: RFS: duperemove/0.10-1 [ITP]

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Felix, let's review. 1) the first patch should be upstreamed 2) the second one should be: -PREFIX = /usr/local +PREFIX ?= /usr this way you can upstream it too. (please forward and add link inside the patches) 3) copyright is outdated.

Bug#801444: marked as done (RFS: node-bootstrap-tour/0.10.2+dfsg-1 [ITP bug #801443])

Your message dated Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:18:05 + (UTC) with message-id <1277885608.463854.1444832285082.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#801444: RFS: node-bootstrap-tour/0.10.2+dfsg-1 [ITP bug #801443] has caused the Debian Bug report #801444, regarding RFS:

Bug#801782: RFS: node-private/0.1.6+20141112-1 [ITP, bug #789794]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-private" * Package name: node-private Version : 0.1.6+20141112-1 Upstream Author : Ben Newman * URL :

Bug#797888: RFS: panda3d/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- Panda3D free 3D engine SDK

Hi, >What exactly? I mean dh_build, dh_clean, dh_install and so on :) >I would like to avoid that, mainly because the work would be obsolete soon, >as upstream wants to switch to CMake in the (more or less) near future. ack then >You realized that these files aren't symlinks but

Bug#801782: RFS: node-private/0.1.6+20141112-1 [ITP, bug #789794]

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, as said on irc: control: 1) priority: optional changelog 2) 0.1.6+20141112-1 --> 0.1.6+git20141112-1 3) README.source. Instead of wget -c https://github.com/benjamn/private/archive/.tar.gz maybe something like

Bug#787861: review: polyml

Hi James, >Thank you for continuing to look at this. I have just uploaded the newest >version (5.5.2-1~rc1) to https://mentors.debian.net/package/polyml. thanks to you for caring! >1) I have sent a request to join debian-science. Presumably I should wait >until the package is ready to be

Bug#784898: RFS: duperemove/0.10-1 [ITP]

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 04:14:16PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > 1) the first patch should be upstreamed > 2) the second one should be: > -PREFIX = /usr/local > +PREFIX ?= /usr > > this way you can upstream it too. > (please forward and add link inside the patches) well, to upstream that

Bug#784898: RFS: duperemove/0.10-1 [ITP]

Another issue: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/duperemove/0.10-1/blhc cheers, G.

Bug#801650: RFS: edgar/1.21-1 [ITP]

Hi again "fonts/DejaVuSans.ttf" I would appreciate using the system font (apt-file search can give you an hint about where it is located, and hedgewars package can show you some code to link it, or to make the code find it) "make clean" I would appreciate fixing distclean and use $(MAKE)

Bug#784898: RFS: duperemove/0.10-1 [ITP]

true story :) bad copy/paste, sorry! thanks for the fix, (please finish your NM process! we need you :p ) G. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android From:"Mattia Rizzolo" Date:Wed, 14 Oct, 2015 at 19:21 Subject:Bug#784898: RFS: duperemove/0.10-1 [ITP] On Wed, Oct 14, 2015

Bug#801782: RFS: node-private/0.1.6+20141112-1 [ITP, bug #789794]

Hi, Le 14/10/2015 17:28, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, as said on irc: control: 1) priority: optional Ok. changelog 2) 0.1.6+20141112-1 --> 0.1.6+git20141112-1 Not according to a discussion with jonas on irc. 3) README.source.

Bug#801650: RFS: edgar/1.21-1 [ITP]

The edgar-data package takes the font and compresses it in the edgar.pak archive. Should I make fonts-dejavu-core a build dependency and link it before it builds? On 10/14/15, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi again > > > "fonts/DejaVuSans.ttf" > > I would

Bug#788418: New upload in mentors

Alright, I have uploaded a new candidate package on mentors. However, the lintian on mentors shows an error that I cannot reproduce locally on my gbp build. The error is the following: postinst-must-call-ldconfig and makes no-sense to me, as I am not doing anything much differently from the

Bug#787861: review: polyml

Hi Gianfranco, I have uploaded 5.5.2-1~rc2 to mentors. 1) Do I need to send a separate email to this then? I also filed #801793 for a transition, but that has already been closed as unnecessary since there are no rdeps. 2) Added 6) The compiler is indeed forcing your code to be linked against

Bug#801711: marked as done (RFS: osmo-trx/0~20150325gitf147b17+dfsg-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:18:14 +0200 with message-id <20151014121814.GA14684@macbookair> and subject line Re: RFS: osmo-trx/0~20150325gitf147b17+dfsg-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #801711, regarding RFS: osmo-trx/0~20150325gitf147b17+dfsg-1 [ITP] to be marked as done.

Bug#784898: RFS: duperemove/0.10-1 [ITP]

Am Mittwoch, den 14.10.2015, 18:41 +0100 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: > thanks for the fix, Thanks very much to both of you. I created now a github fork for it: https://github.com/fezie/duperemove Though I didn't do much yet. > > (please finish your NM process! we need you :p ) Thanks

Bug#801774: RFS: libosmocore/0.8.3-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libosmocore" * Package name: libosmocore Version : 0.8.3-1 Upstream Author : Osmocom * URL : http://bb.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/libosmocore * License :

Bug#788418: New upload in mentors

Hi Ghislain, > Alright, I have uploaded a new candidate package on mentors. > > However, the lintian on mentors shows an error that I cannot reproduce > locally on my gbp build. The error is the following: > > postinst-must-call-ldconfig > > and makes no-sense to me, as I am not doing

Re: Bug#788418: New upload in mentors

El Dimecres, 14 d'octubre de 2015, a les 09:55:02, Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto va escriure: > Hi Ghislain, > > > Alright, I have uploaded a new candidate package on mentors. > > > > However, the lintian on mentors shows an error that I cannot reproduce > > locally on my gbp build. The error is