Bug#805020: marked as done (RFS: sfcgal/1.2.1)

Your message dated Fri, 13 Nov 2015 16:02:28 +0100 with message-id <5645fb84.8040...@xs4all.nl> and subject line RFS: sfcgal/1.2.1 [uploaded] has caused the Debian Bug report #805020, regarding RFS: sfcgal/1.2.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Package gresolver don't go to package list

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi mentors, I adopted the package gresolver recently, in my first upload to mentors my sponsor discovery that even a package is in perl, architecture in d/control was defined as "any" and suggests me to change to "all". So I changed d/control

Bug#804947: RFS: inform/6.31.1+dfsg-2

Hi, On Fri, 2015-11-13 at 16:36 +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > Control: tags 698980 + pending > Control: block 698980 by -1 > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package ‘inform’: Since I've used inform before, I had a small look at the package.

Bug#804947: RFS: inform/6.31.1+dfsg-2

Control: owner -1 ! Hi, On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 20:44:40 +, James Cowgill wrote: > On Fri, 2015-11-13 at 16:36 +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > > Package: sponsorship-requests > > Severity: wishlist > > Control: tags 698980 + pending > > Control: block 698980 by -1 > > > > I

Bug#804947: RFS: inform/6.31.1+dfsg-2

On 13-Nov-2015, Stephen Kitt wrote: > Ben, I am a DD so I can upload it for you (once you fix the issues, > including those James points out). Thank you! I will address the specific questions about the packaging and code base in the next message, which will omit ‘debian-devel-games’. Thank you

Re: Package gresolver don't go to package list

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 01:25:37PM -0200, Paulo wrote: > I adopted the package gresolver recently, in my first upload to mentors my > sponsor discovery that > even a package is in perl, architecture in d/control was defined as "any" and > suggests me to change to "all". > > So I changed

Bug#804947: RFS: inform/6.31.1+dfsg-2

On 13-Nov-2015, James Cowgill wrote: > The package FTBFS when build with dpkg-buildpackage -B: […] > > cd inform-6.31.1/ && ./configure --prefix=/usr […] > > configure: error: cannot run /bin/bash config/config.sub > > debian/rules:49: recipe for target 'build.stamp' failed > > make: ***

Bug#804947: RFS: inform/6.31.1+dfsg-2

On 14-Nov-2015, Ben Finney wrote: > On 13-Nov-2015, James Cowgill wrote: > >  Why not use dh_autoreconf? > > Because I'm not very experienced with GNU Autotools, and wasn't > aware of that command. Would that address the above problem as well, > do you think? > > On 13-Nov-2015, Stephen Kitt

Re: Package gresolver don't go to package list

Hi, thanks Adam, I did it, so now it's only wait. []'s kretcheu :x Em 14-11-2015 00:06, Adam Borowski escreveu: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 01:25:37PM -0200, Paulo wrote: >> I adopted the package gresolver recently, in my first upload to mentors my >> sponsor discovery that >> even a package is

Bug#805020: RFS: sfcgal/1.2.1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hello, I have just prepared a new version of the sfcgal library package which should be ready for inclusion into unstable now after I updated the symbols file from the experimental builds. * Package name: sfcgal Version : 1.2.1-1