Bug#808970: marked as done (RFS: pentobi/10.1-1)

Your message dated Fri, 25 Dec 2015 10:33:54 + with message-id <20151225103354.ga25...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#808970: RFS: pentobi/10.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #808970, regarding RFS: pentobi/10.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#808970: RFS: pentobi/10.1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pentobi" Package name: pentobi Version : 10.1-1 Upstream Author : Markus Enzenberger URL : http://pentobi.sourceforge.net/ License : GPL-3.0+ Section :

Bug#808723: RFS pkgdiff

Hi Iain! Thanks for reviewing and considering to sponsor pkgdiff. I changed 2.0 to 2. The ".0" is appended automatically if you use dh_make for an initial template. Should I report a bug about this to devscripts? I reuploaded it to mentors and also pushed the changes to git. Thanks again Peter

Bug#808976: marked as done (RFS: abi-tracker/1.6-1 ITP)

Your message dated Fri, 25 Dec 2015 15:10:59 + with message-id <20151225151059.ga15...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#808976: RFS: abi-tracker/1.6-1 ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #808976, regarding RFS: abi-tracker/1.6-1 ITP to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#808976: RFS: abi-tracker/1.6-1 ITP

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am planning to bring the abi-tracker tool [1][2] to Debian, because I think it can be very useful for maintainers of shared libraries. Therefore, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "abi-tracker" * Package name:

Bug#808976: RFS: abi-tracker/1.6-1 ITP

Uploaded. Thanks for contributing Debian. -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) Debian Developer (https://nm.debian.org/public/person/czchen) Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896 C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#808723: marked as done (RFS: pkgdiff/1.7.1-1 ITP)

Your message dated Fri, 25 Dec 2015 15:14:28 + with message-id <20151225151428.gb15...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#808723: RFS pkgdiff has caused the Debian Bug report #808723, regarding RFS: pkgdiff/1.7.1-1 ITP to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#808723: RFS pkgdiff

Hi, On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 11:04:05AM +0100, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote: > Thanks for reviewing and considering to sponsor pkgdiff. > I changed 2.0 to 2. The ".0" is appended automatically if you use > dh_make for an initial template. Should I report a bug about this > to devscripts? I think this

Bug#808723: RFS pkgdiff

> > It is not actually a bug to specify GPL-2.0, as both GPL-2 and GPL-2.0 > are acceptable. I'd say otherwise, scripts Ian mentioned that do not > support GPL-2.0 are buggy, and the format specification requires the > dot-zero version number to be accepted as well. > Thanks for the

Bug#808723: RFS pkgdiff

On 25 December 2015 at 11:04, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote: > Thanks for reviewing and considering to sponsor pkgdiff. > I changed 2.0 to 2. The ".0" is appended automatically if you use > dh_make for an initial template. Should I report a bug about this > to devscripts? It is