Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package shut-up.
This package provides several macros to quieten Emacs output. It is
especially useful to make console output more useful when running the
test suites of Emacs Lisp addon packages.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package seq-el.
This library provides sequence-manipulation functions that complement
basic functions provided by subr.el (which comes with Emacs). It is a
useful library that a wide variety of Emac
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:15 AM, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
> - Must .deb versions/filenames be unique over all distribu-
> tions or is it sufficient if package_0.1_amd64.deb is
> unique in a distribution (and thus there is an error in
> aptly)?
I guess by distributions you mean suites. It depe
Hi, Anton,
على الجمعـة 26 شباط 2016 11:42، كتب Anton Gladky:
> Hi Marko,
>
[...]
> Feel free to ask me, if you have some questions regarding those
> notes. You have done a great job, please fix those notices and
> I will upload the package (Afif, if you want, feel free to do it).
>
That's alrig
Hi Alvaro,
why did you write in your debian/copyright that calibrateextruder.py is
licensed under GPL-2+ and printrun/gui/bufferedcanvas.py is under
LGPL-2.1+ ? Isn't there only GPL-3+ in the file headers?
But printrun/gl/libtatlin/actors.py seems to be GPL-2+. Further Joseph
Benden and Max
Hi Marko,
the package looks fine, but I have a couple of notice:
- Use DEP-3 format for the patch
- Try not to use source/lintian-overrides, but fix it in the code.
- lib/extlib-abc/aig/cnf/cnfData.c looks strange, is it some kind
of binary, not the source code?
- Use Files-Exclude parameter in
[2016-02-26 15:34] Edward Betts
>
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-nameparser"
>
> * Package name: python-nameparser
>Version : 0.3.11
>Upstream Author : Derek Gulbranson
> * URL
Hi Giulio,
thanks for your review!
On 24.02.2016 at 16:51, Giulio Paci wrote:
> Hi Philip, I am not a DD, so I cannot sponsor this package. However I am
> interested in this kind of tools and also maintain transcriber, that, despite
> of its age, is still one of the best available alternatives.
>
Your message dated Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:23:56 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: openbsc/0.15.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #815299,
regarding RFS: openbsc/0.15.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:23:55 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: kateperlcheck/1.7-1 [put in ITP ]
has caused the Debian Bug report #815799,
regarding RFS: kateperlcheck/1.7-1 [put in ITP ]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-nameparser"
* Package name: python-nameparser
Version : 0.3.11
Upstream Author : Derek Gulbranson
* URL : https://github.com/derek73/python-nameparser
Hi John,
You have still have interest in sponsoring SyncTerm?
the bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777651 was
archive. Its posible to unarchive it or must i create another rfs bug
request?
thanks!
--
Fernando Toledo
Dock Sud BBS
http://bbs.docksud.com.ar
telnet://bbs.dock
forgot to reply to all.
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:18:34 +0100 (CET)
From: toogley
To: Gianfranco Costamagna
wicd has been picked and abandoned from upstream a lot of times
(I happen to
[PS: I thought i had sent a summarizing email to the wicd-devel which i
didn't. Therefore, i don't know what Tom van Braeckel would think about
this topic. But at least i've correctly resent that email. ]
[...] although with "inactivity" i meant rather actively developing new
features etc
Hi
>i won't adopt the maintainership for wicd, mainly because of upstream's
>inactivity. Basically, it seems that Tom van Braeckel is the only
>contributer currently, who doesn't have the time and priority to
>actively develop wicd. Therefore i don't see in wicd a future.
wicd has been picke
15 matches
Mail list logo
