Your message dated Sat, 23 Apr 2016 02:22:48 +
with message-id <20160423022248.gg16...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#822292: RFS: nauty/2.6r5+ds-1 [NEWRELEASE] - library
for graph automorphisms
has caused the Debian Bug report #822292,
regarding RFS: nauty/2.6r5+ds-1 [NEWRELEASE]
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Sponsors,
I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian package nauty [1]. This
package
mainly brings to Debian the lastest release of nauty. nauty stands for
`No AUTomorphisms, Yes?'.
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
[1] https
Hi Gianfranco,
Here is a link to the latest version, which uses triggers instead of
postinst and postrm. I think it's ready to upload, but please double
check :-)
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/btrfs-progs/btrfs-progs_4.4.1-1.1.dsc
Cheers,
Nicholas
any news on this? :)
nearly a month passed, and the "problematic" thing has been merged
upstream.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 12:45:37PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:49:55AM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote:
> > On 20/03/16 03:12, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > >> The issues tha
Hi Dimitri,
On 22 April 2016 at 19:20, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> I haven't looked closely, but i have a lot dubious emails about btrfs package.
> (a) i do not maintain backports, anybody is free to do those
> (b) all of my packages are lowNMU, meaning I trust any/all DDs to do
> sensible thing
On 23 April 2016 at 00:06, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> On 21 April 2016 at 08:33, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> Hi Gianfranco,
>>
>> On 04/21/2016 09:48 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
activate update-initramfs
>>> do you think it is worth adding to the current NMU or it is better to leave
>>
On 21 April 2016 at 03:53, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Policy §10.4 says that /bin/sh script need to follow SUSv3 + some
> extensions. Both "hash" and "command -v" are optional in SUSv3 (but they are
> mandatory in SUSv4), so in theory you shouldn't use them. In practice,
> however, "command -v" is probab
On 21 April 2016 at 08:33, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Hi Gianfranco,
>
> On 04/21/2016 09:48 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>> activate update-initramfs
>> do you think it is worth adding to the current NMU or it is better to leave
>> it for
>> a future upload?
>
> I'm not sure if you meant to
Your message dated Fri, 22 Apr 2016 20:44:59 +
with message-id <20160422204459.ga5...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#822150: RFS: gap-guava/3.13+ds-1 [NEWREALEASE] -
coding theory library for GAP
has caused the Debian Bug report #822150,
regarding RFS: gap-guava/3.13+ds-1 [NEWREAL
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 22:42:03 +0900 d...@debian.org wrote:
> > Okay, I'll fix it.
>
> Thank you. I am waiting for your uploading.
0.8.2 has been released, so I've updated to it.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/growl-for-linux/growl-for-linux_0.8.2-1.dsc
pgpUTgmWLStgQ.pgp
Descri
Thank you again for your replies, Gianfranco,
>>I would like to get both my new package (python3-tldp) and a revised
>>ldp-docbook-stylesheets on the conveyor belt into the Debian
>>universe.
>
>ok
>
>>After trying to understand the flow of work and the current status
>>with these two packages
Hi,
On 04/21/2016 10:32 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Joachim Reichel , 2016-04-19, 20:38:
>> background: on armel and armhf Qt is using OpenGL ES, but my package cgal
>> does
>> not support OpenGL ES (yet). The OpenGL functionality is only needed for some
>> demos and their support library which are
Hi Martin
>I would like to get both my new package (python3-tldp) and a revised
>ldp-docbook-stylesheets on the conveyor belt into the Debian
>universe.
ok
>After trying to understand the flow of work and the current status
>with these two packages, I have come up with the following plan.
>
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:26:23PM +0900, HAYASHI Kentaro wrote:
> I've already contacted with upstream author in this issue,
> isn't good enough?
> https://github.com/mattn/growl-for-linux/issues/56
You are more than wonderful.
And I am sorry to overlook this issue.
> Okay, I'll fix it.
Thank
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 01:22:46 +0900 d...@debian.org wrote:
> OK, prior confirmation is not always needed.
> Generally, if others already have made package,
> it is nice to contact him/her to avoid redundant work.
> Now, since you have sent PR to upstream github to make packaging better,
> I hope you
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 01:37:23PM +0200, Tim Dengel wrote:
> I am currently preparing version 0.2.0-1 of my package gnome-twitch, and
> I have a question about automatically generated dbgsym packages: Do I
> need to list the -dbgsym package in debian/control?
No.
> According to the wiki at https:
Hi Gert,
Am 22.04.2016 um 13:50 schrieb Gert Wollny:
> Did you add something like
>
> deb http://debug.mirrors.debian.org/debian-debug unstable-debug main
>
> to your sources.list? Because I get a really long list of dbgsym
> packages.
My mistake, I forgot to do that on my laptop. After co
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 01:50:43PM +0200, Ondrej Novy wrote:
> 2016-04-22 13:37 GMT+02:00 Tim Dengel :
> > I also get a warning when I'm building my package: "dpkg-genchanges:
> > warning: package gnome-twitch-dbgsym listed in files list but not in
> > control info"
>
> ignore this warning.
there
Hello Tim,
Am Freitag, den 22.04.2016, 13:37 +0200 schrieb Tim Dengel:
>
> According to the wiki at https://wiki.debian.org/DebugPackage I >
> need "no additional changes to your source package",
There is indeed no need to change the source package.
> but I saw that the package openhpi list
Hi,
2016-04-22 13:37 GMT+02:00 Tim Dengel :
> am currently preparing version 0.2.0-1 of my package gnome-twitch, and
> I have a question about automatically generated dbgsym packages: Do I
> need to list the -dbgsym package in debian/control?
>
you should not.
> According to the wiki at https
Dear mentors,
I am currently preparing version 0.2.0-1 of my package gnome-twitch, and
I have a question about automatically generated dbgsym packages: Do I
need to list the -dbgsym package in debian/control?
According to the wiki at https://wiki.debian.org/DebugPackage I need "no
additional chan
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 01:49:15AM -0300, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote:
> Now running lintian...
>
> 2. E: roadfighter: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share
> usr/share/games/roadfighter/roadfighter
>
> 3. P: roadfighter: no-upstream-changelog
>
> 6. I: roadfighter: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-
22 matches
Mail list logo
