Re: Bug#823895: RFS: lsm/1.0.4-1

Hello, I made some changes at the packages, if someone can sponsor I'll thanks. On 10-05-2016 02:43, Lucas Castro wrote > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lsm" > > *

Bug#823187: RFS: icdiff/1.7.3-1

On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 22:37 +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > Upstream is still unsure how to address this problem properly given > that he wants to retain a specific structure to his code. There have > been a few suggestions and PRs from myself and others, but they are > apparently not quite what

Seek for sponsor: Ananicy

Hi guys, I have a tool for auto set cpu/io nice by process name I think it's only for desktop usage I just wanted a tool for auto set programs nice in my system, i.e.: Why i must have a lags, while i'm compiling kernel and playing a game? Why dropbox client eat all my IO? Why torrent/dc client

Seek for sponsor: Systemd-swap

Hi guys, I have a tool for manage swap spaces on: zram - Autoconfigurating zswap - configure block devices - auto find and do swapon files - (sparse files for saving space, support btrfs) vram - EXPERIMENTAL: for creating swap on video memory https://github.com/Nefelim4ag/systemd-swap I have

Bug#823187: RFS: icdiff/1.7.3-1

Hi Paul, some quick news regarding icdiff... […] >>> AFAICS icdiff is currently compatible with both Python 2 and Python 3. >> >> Excellent. In case upstream doesn't want to switch to using Python 3 in >> the script, I would recommend the Debian version do that. > > OK, I have already done

Bug#806815: Thursday

Work for us and earn 3,500monthly.2hrs/week.Reply for info

Bug#815444: RFS: lzd/0.8-1

Hi Daniel, You're welcome. Have a nice day! Regards, Eriberto 2016-05-12 12:39 GMT-03:00 Daniel Baumann : > close 815444 > thanks > > Hi Eriberto, > > sorry for my late answer.. yes, of course I remember you. > > Regarding lzd, I've decided to wait a

Bug#815444: RFS: lzd/0.8-1

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote: > I don't think it's a good idea to have watch files in the package, this > should be a seperate metadata, so I prefer not using them as they're > conceptionally outdated and require uploads just for keeping them working > (circumventing

Bug#817005: marked as done (RFS: aseqjoy/0.0.1-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Thu, 12 May 2016 16:11:43 + (UTC) with message-id <1177206933.2006266.1463069503586.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#817005: RFS: aseqjoy/0.0.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #817005, regarding RFS: aseqjoy/0.0.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done.

Bug#822722: RFS: tldp/0.7.7 [ITP #822181]

Thank you for all of the suggestions! I'll open a different bug ticket once I figure out what's going on. (I think you wanted this one closed.) -Martin -- Martin A. Brown http://linux-ip.net/

Bug#822722: RFS: tldp/0.7.7 [ITP #822181]

Hi, >I did not know about 'sbuild'. Now I do. > >Is this the tool that is used for building all packages to generate >the distributions? DebOMatic isn't the tool used by buildds systems, but sbuild is (with various different resolvers) >If so, then I'll stop building with pbuilder and gbp

Bug#815444: RFS: lzd/0.8-1

close 815444 thanks Hi Eriberto, sorry for my late answer.. yes, of course I remember you. Regarding lzd, I've decided to wait a bit with the dbg->dbgsym transition a bit more (and have thus have uploaded 0.8-1 already, as it now doesn't have to go through NEW that way and so I don't need a

Bug#822722: RFS: tldp/0.7.7 [ITP #822181]

Greetings Gianfranco, >as you wish, but... >http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/tldp/0.7.12-1/buildlog > >the three test are failing on a clean sbuild environment I did not know about 'sbuild'. Now I do. Is this the tool that is used for building all packages to generate

Bug#824112: marked as done (RFS: pynac -- Engine for symbolic geometric calculus for Python)

Your message dated Thu, 12 May 2016 15:15:48 + (UTC) with message-id <1167784849.1985835.1463066148249.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#824112: RFS: pynac -- Engine for symbolic geometric calculus for Python has caused the Debian Bug report #824112, regarding RFS: pynac

Bug#817005: RFS: aseqjoy/0.0.1-1 [ITP]

El 10/05/16 a las 17:22, Gianfranco Costamagna escribió: > > can you please fix the copyright? > (I can also look at a "lintian-problematic" file and tell you what is wrong > in that case, > otherwise my answer is too generic I admit) > > thanks! > > Gianfranco > fixed, uploaded again and

Bug#824121: RFS: python-nanomsg/1.0-2 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-nanomsg" * Package name: python-nanomsg Version : 1.0-2 Upstream Author : Tony Simpson * URL : https://github.com/tonysimpson/nanomsg-python *

Re: Bug in pybuild's handling of --install-lib? [Was: Re: entry-point script and private module install directory]

On 12/05/16 13:16, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: [Ghislain Vaillant, 2016-05-12] Is this a bug in pybuild or am I missing something? you're missing my second reply¹ [¹] https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2016/05/msg00043.html Indeed, sorry for the noise. Thanks again for the support. Ghis

Re: Bug in pybuild's handling of --install-lib? [Was: Re: entry-point script and private module install directory]

[Ghislain Vaillant, 2016-05-12] > Is this a bug in pybuild or am I missing something? you're missing my second reply¹ [¹] https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2016/05/msg00043.html -- Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer www.ozarowski.pl www.griffith.cc

Bug#824112: RFS: pynac -- Engine for symbolic geometric calculus for Python

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pynac" -- a previous version is already in Debian, so this is only an update : * Package name: pynac Version : 0.6.5 Upstream author : Burcin Erocal * URL :

Bug in pybuild's handling of --install-lib? [Was: Re: entry-point script and private module install directory]

On 12/05/16 09:22, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: On 11/05/16 18:55, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: you can create a wrapper or patch /usr/bin script to sys.path.append('/usr/share/pyfr') but the easiest solution is to install the script to /usr/share/pyfr/ (if the module is "pyfr" as well, simply rename the

Bug#824104: RFS: gneural-network/0.9.1-1 [ITP]

On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 11:17 +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > On 12/05/16 10:41, lumin wrote: > > Package: sponsorship-requests > > [...] > > Thanks, > > mentors: "Watch file is not present" > > Why? http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/gneuralnetwork/ GNU's savannah service:: gneuralnetwork,

Bug#815444: RFS: lzd/0.8-1

Hi, what happened here? g. On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:38:40 -0300 Eriberto Mota wrote: > Hi Daniel! How are you? Do you remember me? You alrealy were my > sponsor in Forensics Team in the past. > > I can sponsor this package. Please, can you do the the following changes? > > 1.

Bug#824104: RFS: gneural-network/0.9.1-1 [ITP]

On 12/05/16 10:41, lumin wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: Jean Michel Sellier , a...@debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gneural-network" * Package name: gneural-network Version

Bug#824104: RFS: gneural-network/0.9.1-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: Jean Michel Sellier , a...@debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gneural-network" * Package name: gneural-network Version : 0.9.1-1 Upstream Author :

Bug#823140: RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- a deep learning framework [ITP]

On Sat, 2016-05-07 at 10:05 +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > s/DEB_CPPFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND/DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND in your d/rules. > Done. Updated package has been uploaded to mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/caffe

Bug#822722: marked as done (RFS: tldp/0.7.7 [ITP #822181])

Your message dated Thu, 12 May 2016 08:50:50 + (UTC) with message-id <50003481.1458651.1463043050854.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#822722: RFS: tldp/0.7.7 [ITP #822181] has caused the Debian Bug report #822722, regarding RFS: tldp/0.7.7 [ITP #822181] to be marked as

Re: entry-point script and private module install directory

On 11/05/16 18:55, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: [Ghislain Vaillant, 2016-05-11] Dear all, I have a package (pyfr), which is meant to be used as a command-line application only. The main script (pyfr) is installed via setuptools' entry_points['console_scripts'], which generates the entry-point