Bug#821907: RFS: fbless/0.2.3-1 ITP

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 02:28:22PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > > Please rename README to README.ru, preferably upstream. > > dh_install'ed > > > Please consider using hyphenation data from hyphen-* packages. > > dh_linktree'ed > > Please, review once more. Please build this in a clean sid

Bug#824431: marked as done (RFS: symmetrica/2.0+ds-4 [Refreshment] - Symmetrica Combinatoric C Library)

Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2016 23:44:19 + with message-id <20160515234419.gl12...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#824431: RFS: symmetrica/2.0+ds-4 [Refreshment] - Symmetrica Combinatoric C Library has caused the Debian Bug report #824431, regarding RFS: symmetrica/2.0+ds-4 [Re

Bug#823742: RFS: hdf-compass/0.6.0b5-1 [ITP]

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 07:48:27PM -0300, Tiago Ilieve wrote: > There's one use case I can think of where overriding a > "binary-without-manpage" is fine: if the executable isn't supposed to > be used by the end-user, only as an external command called from the > application itself. In this case t

Bug#823742: RFS: hdf-compass/0.6.0b5-1 [ITP]

Mattia, On 15 May 2016 at 16:24, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > * d/hdf-compass.lintian-overrides > + bad habit doing lintian overrides without a comment. But I can't > imagine a reason to override binary-without-manpage. That one just > needs fixing, and hiding it behind an override doesn't

Bug#824431: RFS: symmetrica/2.0+ds-4 [Refreshment] - Symmetrica Combinatoric C Library

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Sponsors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package symmetrica, a mathematical C library used by Sage. This very version refreshes the package. Thanks in advance, Jerome [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packa

Bug#824004: RFS: pygtail/0.6.1-1

On 15/05/16 20:54, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 09:27:26AM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for "pygtail" > > o/ > > I really wonder why you use 2 different email address for your packaging > work (mail@) and to file bugs (chris@). It made me near

Bug#823837: RFS: haproxy-log-analysis/2.0~b0-1

On 15/05/16 21:10, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 02:33:09PM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for "haproxy-log-analysis" > > o/ > >> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-modules/packages/haproxy-log-analysis.git/ > > uploaded! Amazing, thank you

Bug#823187: marked as done (RFS: icdiff/1.7.3-1)

Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2016 21:33:23 +0100 with message-id <12ec6df2-f799-42ac-8cd5-4eda29cea...@tetrinetsucht.de> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #823187, regarding RFS: icdiff/1.7.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#823837: marked as done (RFS: haproxy-log-analysis/2.0~b0-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2016 20:10:46 + with message-id <20160515201045.gg12...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#823837: RFS: haproxy-log-analysis/2.0~b0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #823837, regarding RFS: haproxy-log-analysis/2.0~b0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This

Bug#824004: marked as done (RFS: pygtail/0.6.1-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2016 19:54:37 + with message-id <20160515195436.ge12...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#824004: RFS: pygtail/0.6.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #824004, regarding RFS: pygtail/0.6.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#824121: RFS: python-nanomsg/1.0-2 [ITP]

control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:38:14PM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-nanomsg" o/ > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-nanomsg/python-nanomsg_1.0-2.dsc This one too. It has V

Bug#823742: RFS: hdf-compass/0.6.0b5-1 [ITP]

control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! control: block 812434 by -1 On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 11:46:45AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hdf-compass" o/ > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hdf-compass/hdf-compass_0.6.0b5-1.

Bug#823478: RFS: python3-protobuf3/0.2.1-2 [ITP]

control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! control: block 823321 by -1 On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 02:09:23PM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python3-protobuf3" o/ > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python3-protobuf3/python3-prot

Bug#823331: RFS: node-zmq/2.15.0+dfsg-2

control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! control: block 823251 by -1 On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 05:33:28PM +0200, Gordon Ball wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-zmq" o/ > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-zmq/node-zmq_2.15.0+dfsg-2.dsc Alright, so this

Bug#823270: marked as done (RFS: csvjdbc/1.0.29-1)

Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2016 18:19:09 + with message-id <20160515181853.gt16...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#823270: RFS: csvjdbc/1.0.29-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #823270, regarding RFS: csvjdbc/1.0.29-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#817865: marked as done (RFS: acmetool/0.0.49 [ITP] -- automatic certificate acquisition tool for Let's Encrypt)

Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2016 18:07:30 + with message-id <20160515180728.gs16...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: [Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#817865: RFS: acmetool/0.0.49 [ITP] -- automatic certificate acquisition tool for Let's Encrypt has caused the Debian Bug report #817865, regard

Bug#817865: [Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#817865: RFS: acmetool/0.0.49 [ITP] -- automatic certificate acquisition tool for Let's Encrypt

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 05:39:31PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 01:30:39PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote: > > Please try building acmetool commit fb8b2a5, which disables the > > OCSP test to avoid network access in the build chroot. > > yeah, that one does build. Please do

Bug#817865: [Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#817865: RFS: acmetool/0.0.49 [ITP] -- automatic certificate acquisition tool for Let's Encrypt

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 01:30:39PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote: > Please try building acmetool commit fb8b2a5, which disables the > OCSP test to avoid network access in the build chroot. yeah, that one does build. Given that you seem to be here, maybe you can double check these lintian tags? W: ac

Bug#817865: [Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#817865: RFS: acmetool/0.0.49 [ITP] -- automatic certificate acquisition tool for Let's Encrypt

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 01:30:39PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote: > Hi Mattia, > > Please try building acmetool commit fb8b2a5, which disables the > OCSP test to avoid network access in the build chroot. Sorry, I pushed too fast, that should be commit 4244a83. Peter

Bug#817865: [Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#817865: RFS: acmetool/0.0.49 [ITP] -- automatic certificate acquisition tool for Let's Encrypt

Hi, 2016-05-15 19:26 GMT+02:00 Mattia Rizzolo : > > I only maintain letsencrypt.sh that doesn't have tests, so I'm not > really testing it. I don't know about the other clients. > but there are tests: https://github.com/lukas2511/letsencrypt.sh/blob/master/test.sh :) -- Best regards Bc. Ondre

Bug#809623: RFS: telegram-purple/1.2.5

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 08:18:28PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > >It *is* backward-compatible, but now a freshly-introduced > >turns-out-to-be-big feature is missing. > > > let me know if you can do your upstream features in time, and I'll try to > quickly make the package > up

Bug#817865: [Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#817865: RFS: acmetool/0.0.49 [ITP] -- automatic certificate acquisition tool for Let's Encrypt

Hi Mattia, Please try building acmetool commit fb8b2a5, which disables the OCSP test to avoid network access in the build chroot. Peter

Bug#817865: [Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#817865: RFS: acmetool/0.0.49 [ITP] -- automatic certificate acquisition tool for Let's Encrypt

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 01:14:54PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote: > Thanks for catching this. I built the package in an sbuild chroot, > which by default does not block network connections. The test is > trying to contact the Let’s Encrypt staging server. As you probably know that's not allowed :) Al

Bug#822634: RFS: magit-svn/2.1.1-1 [ITP]

control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:43:41PM +0200, Alberto Luaces wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "magit-svn" o/ > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/magit-svn/magit-svn_2.1.1-1.dsc Well, I prefer git, so I'll do

Bug#817865: [Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#817865: RFS: acmetool/0.0.49 [ITP] -- automatic certificate acquisition tool for Let's Encrypt

Hi Mattia, On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 03:55:04PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > So, I was about to upload, but it failed to build: > >dh_auto_test -O--buildsystem=golang > cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu > go test -v github.com/hlandau/acme/acmeapi > github.com/hlandau/acme/acmeapi/acmeendp

Bug#821171: RFS: growl-for-linux/0.8.1-2 [ITP]

control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 06:56:25PM +0900, HAYASHI Kentaro wrote: > So, I've removed package from mentors.d.n. and I'll contact > to upstream above issues to fix them. When solved, please remove the moreinfo tag. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Ke

Bug#820383: RFS: photocollage/1.4.0-1 [ITP]

control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 09:33:15PM +0200, Adrien Vergé wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "photocollage" o/ > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/photocollage/photocollage_1.4.0-1.dsc * d/control: + Vcs-* is me

Bug#819615: RFS: spin/6.4.5-1 [ITP] -- formal software verification tool

control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:47:40PM -0700, Tom Lee wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the "spin" package: o/ > dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/spin/spin_6.4.5-1.dsc Actually, I'm going to use the git repository, as there is

Bug#824411: RFS: stterm/0.6-0.1 NMU

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "stterm" * Package name: stterm Version : 0.6-0.1 Upstream Author : Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> * Url : http://st.suckless.org * Licenses: GPL-2+, M

Bug#817865: [Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#817865: RFS: acmetool/0.0.49 [ITP] -- automatic certificate acquisition tool for Let's Encrypt

control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 03:23:56PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote: > Would you do the honour of uploading acmetool? > > git clone https://anonscm.debian.org/git/letsencrypt/acmetool.git > cd acmetool && pristine-tar checkout ../acmetool_0.0.49.orig.tar

Bug#811426: RFS: golang-github-kennygrant-sanitize/1.0-1 [ITP]

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:09:14PM -0800, Nathan Osman wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package > "golang-github-kennygrant-sanitize" > http://mentors.debian.net/package/golang-github-kennygrant-sanitize please consider getting in touch with the pkg-go team, maintain the package withi

Bug#806815: RFS: lirc/0.9.4~pre1-1.3 [NMU]

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 03:16:01PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Given that nothing happened here in the last 6 months, I'm closing this > RFS ticket. > > Feel free to open a new one if/when you'll come back. I mean, Stefan is (at least in Debian) very much inactive; so you either go ahead witho

Bug#806815: marked as done (RFS: lirc/0.9.4~pre1-1.3 [NMU] -- Linux Infrared Remote Control)

Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2016 15:16:02 + with message-id <20160515151601.gh16...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line RFS: lirc/0.9.4~pre1-1.3 [NMU] has caused the Debian Bug report #806815, regarding RFS: lirc/0.9.4~pre1-1.3 [NMU] -- Linux Infrared Remote Control to be marked as done. Th

Bug#806572: marked as done (RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA])

Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2016 15:13:34 + with message-id <20160515151333.gg16...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #806572, regarding RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This me

Bug#824262: gnustep-make pacakge review

I'm no expert on debian packaging, but this looks like a reasonable update of the previous gnustep-make package; many files have changed but each change seems small, but since I don't know how the packaging system works, I can't judge whether the changes are all good ... But I *have* tried out

Bug#824373: marked as done (RFS: node-moment/2.13.0+ds-1)

Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2016 13:20:49 + with message-id <20160515132048.gb16...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#824373: RFS: node-moment/2.13.0+ds-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #824373, regarding RFS: node-moment/2.13.0+ds-1 to be marked as done. This means that you cla

Bug#824267: marked as done (RFS: node-es5-shim/4.5.8-1)

Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2016 13:08:18 + with message-id <20160515130817.ga16...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#824267: RFS: node-es5-shim/4.5.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #824267, regarding RFS: node-es5-shim/4.5.8-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#824267: RFS: node-es5-shim/4.5.8-1

Hi, On 15/05/2016 13:56, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 03:54:14PM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-es5-shim/node-es5-shim_4.5.8-1.dsc All good, but I'm going to use the git

Bug#824267: RFS: node-es5-shim/4.5.8-1

Hi, On 15/05/2016 13:56, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 03:54:14PM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-es5-shim/node-es5-shim_4.5.8-1.dsc All good, but I'm going to use the git

Bug#824267: RFS: node-es5-shim/4.5.8-1

control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 03:54:14PM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote: > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-es5-shim/node-es5-shim_4.5.8-1.dsc All good, but I'm going to use the git repository for team maintained stuff like this.

Bug#821323: RFS: reniced/1.20-1

control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 07:00:32PM +0200, Christian Garbs wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "reniced" o/ I can do it. > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/reniced/reniced_1.20-1.dsc A review: * d/control: +

Bug#823187: RFS: icdiff/1.7.3-1

Hi Paul, > Uploaded. Cool, thanks, and for the other hints as well. Will work on the patches right away, and let’s see what upstream does for the next version. Cheers Sascha signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: RFS: setop/0.1-1 [ITP]

Sorry for the long delay. Nothing to review yet, because there are some open questions. Am 20.04.2016 um 23:16 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: Is it this one? I exactly followed all instructions from

Bug#824378: RFS: node-ast-types/0.8.16-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-ast-types" * Package name: node-ast-types Version : 0.8.16-1 Upstream Author : Ben Newman * URL : http://github.com/benjamn/ast-types * License