Bug#824625: RFS: pentobi/12.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pentobi". Package name: pentobi Version : 12.0-1 Upstream Author : Markus Enzenberger URL : http://pentobi.sourceforge.net/ License : GPL-3.0+ Section

Bug#824622: RFS: golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1/1.0.2-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1": git clone

Bug#824621: RFS: golang-gopkg-cheggaaa-pb.v1/1.0.3-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "golang-gopkg-cheggaaa-pb.v1": git clone

Bug#824619: RFS: golang-github-hlandau-degoutils/0.0~git20160421.0.389a847-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "golang-github-hlandau-degoutils": git clone https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-github-hlandau-degoutils.git

Re: Binaries under "/usr/lib/"

Tiago Ilieve writes: > Hi Mattia, > > (Moving the discussion from BTS to "debian-mentors" mailing list.) > > On 15 May 2016 at 20:25, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > Given that in your case you say the binary is not called by anything > > else than the

Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep build system

oops ! accidentally removed gsdh_gnustep symlinks ! Fixed and reuploaded add this line to changelog * Provide a new debian/gnustep-make.links. https://mentors.debian.net/package/gnustep-make or dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-make/gnustep-make_2.6.8-1.dsc

Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep build system

Hi Le 17/05/2016 11:52, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > > > Depends: gnustep-common (>= ${source:Version}), > gnustep-common (<< ${source:Version}.1~), > gobjc, > -autotools-dev, > ${misc:Depends}, > -${gnustep:Depends} > +${perl:Depends} > +Replaces: gnustep-common (<<

Bug#819391: marked as done (RFS: toulbar2/0.9.8 debian-science [ITP])

Your message dated Tue, 17 May 2016 23:36:21 +0200 with message-id <573b8ed5.3050...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#819391: RFS: toulbar2/0.9.8 debian-science [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #819391, regarding RFS: toulbar2/0.9.8 debian-science [ITP] to be marked as done. This means

Bug#820383: RFS: photocollage/1.4.0-1 [ITP]

Hi Mattia, Thanks for your remarks. I've addressed all of them, as well as another warning output by `pbuilder --build`. Cheers, Adrien 2016-05-15 18:41 GMT+02:00 Mattia Rizzolo : > control: tag -1 moreinfo > control: owner -1 ! > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 09:33:15PM +0200,

Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep build system

Le 17/05/2016 19:27, Eric Heintzmann a écrit : > Hi, > Reuploaded ! https://mentors.debian.net/package/gnustep-make or dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-make/gnustep-make_2.6.8-1.dsc Updated changelog: gnustep-make (2.6.8-1) unstable; urgency=low * Team

Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep build system

Hi, Reuploaded ! Le 17/05/2016 18:58, Eric Heintzmann a écrit : > > > Le 17/05/2016 11:52, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : >> Hi, >>> switch to autoreconf done >> >> nice! >> >> little nitpick before answering to the open points: >> * debian/patches/manpage-spelling-errors.patch: New, fix two

a few questions on ITP shadowsocks-libev before formal RFS

Dear mentors list, I'm doing ITP packaging on shadowsocks-libev. I have a few questions in detail. I have set up a git repo on github: https://github.com/rogers0/shadowsocks-libev My current changes are pushed to branch: RFC Package builds fine with command: gbp buildpackage -us -uc

Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep build system

Le 17/05/2016 11:52, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > Hi, >> switch to autoreconf done > > > nice! > > little nitpick before answering to the open points: > * debian/patches/manpage-spelling-errors.patch: New, fix two spelling > + > errors. > > > there is a new space in changelog >

Bug#823140: RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- a deep learning framework [ITP]

On 17/05/16 15:42, lumin wrote: Thank you for this careful and thorough review! > 2) why the python3 support is disabled? note: this will require a trip in new queue, so if possible I would prefer a python3-only build Same here. Since the build system leaves you the choice, please consider

Re: Which libstdc++ library?

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 04:26:21PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > Or is the correct libstdc++-dev package automatically installed with > g++? You could look at the dependencies yourself. g++-5 Depends: libstdc++-5-dev -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#823140: RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- a deep learning framework [ITP]

Thank you for this careful and thorough review! On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 14:50 +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Dear all, > > On 16/05/16 15:50, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Hi Lumin > > > > > >> Done. Updated package has been uploaded to mentors: > >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/caffe

Which libstdc++ library?

Hi, I have a package (dpuser [1]), that during execution may call the c++ compiler g++ for some on-the-fly-generated C++ files that use the standard C++ library. I am now curious on how I need to specify the runtime dependency from the -dev library? The C++ compiler is probably just the "g++"

Bug#823140: RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- a deep learning framework [ITP]

Dear all, On 16/05/16 15:50, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Hi Lumin Done. Updated package has been uploaded to mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/caffe 1) did you try to enable the Debug build too? without CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo you won't be able to get automatic debug

Re: ITP: logdata-anomaly-miner -- lightweight tool for log checking, log analysis

Hello, After start of packaging and the release of the first 3 versions after port from java to python, I am still looking for a mentor for package inclusion. I have written fixes for open points from first review but there are still some questions open, where I am not sure, how to address them.

Bug#824555: marked as done (RFS: python-arrayfire/3.3.20160516-1)

Your message dated Tue, 17 May 2016 13:26:06 + (UTC) with message-id <1975164854.5942837.1463491566836.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#824555: RFS: python-arrayfire/3.3.20160516-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #824555, regarding RFS: python-arrayfire/3.3.20160516-1

Bug#824555: RFS: python-arrayfire/3.3.20160516-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-arrayfire" * Package name: python-arrayfire Version : 3.3.20160516-1 Upstream Author : ArrayFire * URL : https://github.com/arrayfire/arrayfire-python *

Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep build system

Hi, >switch to autoreconf done nice! little nitpick before answering to the open points: * debian/patches/manpage-spelling-errors.patch: New, fix two spelling + errors. there is a new space in changelog (pull-debian-source gnustep-make debdiff of the two dsc files, filterdiff the debian

Bug#821323: marked as done (RFS: reniced/1.20-1)

Your message dated Tue, 17 May 2016 08:49:06 + with message-id <20160517084905.gb10...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#821323: RFS: reniced/1.20-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #821323, regarding RFS: reniced/1.20-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep build system

Hi, Le 16/05/2016 21:15, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > Hi Eric, > > > As you wish, you can switch in a later upload, or do it now and maybe > fix/revert in case of troubles switch to autoreconf done > I don't think so, but I can review a patch/package, because some lines > without their