Bug#827398: RFS: pkg-kde-tools/0.15.21~bpo8+1

2016-06-15 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 08:08:59PM +0200, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pkg-kde-tools" > > * Package name: pkg-kde-tools >Version : 0.15.21~bpo8+1 >Upstream Author : Copyright © 2007-2008 Sune Vuorela > I'm not sure whether you've

Bug#827397: RFS: vlc/2.0.3-5+deb7u3

2016-06-15 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Adam, (answering in general, not in this particular situation) >I've reviewed the upload, but I'm not sure if you coordinated it >with the LTS team. I find a contradition: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts/2016/06/msg00031.html >says vlc is no longer supported in wheezy, yet in > https

Bug#827397: RFS: vlc/2.0.3-5+deb7u3

2016-06-15 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 08:03:28PM +0200, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vlc" > > * Package name: vlc >Version : 2.0.3-5+deb7u3 > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vlc/vlc_2.0.3-5+deb7u3.dsc > > Changes since the last upload: >

Re: Restore Iceweasel branding

2016-06-15 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 02:06:56PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > the "bug" is introduce with a stable-release-update, and should be fixed > with another s-p-u > > fixing it with a backport means the user should be aware of the fix in another > pocket, enable it, install it, and so

Bug#827394: marked as done (RFS: spacefm/1.0.5-2 [RC])

2016-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 16 Jun 2016 05:22:01 +0200 with message-id <20160616032201.ga6...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#827394: RFS: spacefm/1.0.5-2 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #827394, regarding RFS: spacefm/1.0.5-2 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#827400: marked as done (RFS: kadu/3.0-1.1 [NMU, RC])

2016-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 16 Jun 2016 04:38:19 +0200 with message-id <20160616023819.ga2...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#827400: RFS: kadu/3.0-1.1 [NMU, RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #827400, regarding RFS: kadu/3.0-1.1 [NMU, RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#827425: RFS: lacme/0.1-1 [ITP] -- ACME client written with process isolation and minimal privileges in mind

2016-06-15 Thread Harlan Lieberman-Berg
Harlan Lieberman-Berg writes: > Guilhem Moulin writes: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lacme" > > Hello Guilhem! > > This looks like a well-Debianized package to me. > > I'm curious about how you would differentiate a package like this from > the other ACME clients out there -- I kn

Bug#827425: RFS: lacme/0.1-1 [ITP] -- ACME client written with process isolation and minimal privileges in mind

2016-06-15 Thread Harlan Lieberman-Berg
Guilhem Moulin writes: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lacme" Hello Guilhem! This looks like a well-Debianized package to me. I'm curious about how you would differentiate a package like this from the other ACME clients out there -- I know specifically letskencrypt seems to fall in

Bug#827333: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-1 [ITP]

2016-06-15 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Tuesday, June 14 2016, I wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "newlisp" > > * Package name: newlisp > Version : 10.7.0-1 > Upstream Author : Lutz Mueller > * URL : http://www.newl

Bug#827425: RFS: lacme/0.1-1 [ITP] -- ACME client written with process isolation and minimal privileges in mind

2016-06-15 Thread Guilhem Moulin
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lacme" * Package name: lacme Version : 0.1-1 Upstream Author : Guilhem Moulin * URL : https://git.guilhem.org/lacme/about/ * License : GPL-3+ Section

Re: how to build packages with a specific complier ?

2016-06-15 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:16:05PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > >It appears that some tests fail for one of my package (gmp-ecm) on one > >architecture (s390x): > >after some investigation, it appears that it is a compiler issue: building > >with gcc-6 (instead of gcc-5) > >causes no iss

Re: how to build packages with a specific complier ?

2016-06-15 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 15/06/16 23:20, Eric Heintzmann wrote: > > > Le 15/06/2016 à 23:20, Jerome BENOIT a écrit : >> >> On 15/06/16 20:54, Eric Heintzmann wrote: >>> How can we debug with upstream, without any access to a 390x machine ? >> >> You can ask for an access to Debian Porter machine: >> https://db.debia

Re: how to build packages with a specific complier ?

2016-06-15 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Le 15/06/2016 à 23:20, Jerome BENOIT a écrit : > > On 15/06/16 20:54, Eric Heintzmann wrote: >> How can we debug with upstream, without any access to a 390x machine ? > > You can ask for an access to Debian Porter machine: > https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi > https://dsa.debian.org/doc/schroot/

Bug#827383: RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0.1+ds-2 [RC] -- Factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method

2016-06-15 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hi Again: On 15/06/16 22:19, Eric Heintzmann wrote: > > > Le 15/06/2016 à 23:12, Jerome BENOIT a écrit : >> Hello Eric, >> >> On 15/06/16 20:57, Eric Heintzmann wrote: >> >> >>> Le 15/06/2016 à 16:41, Jerome Benoit a écrit : Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: serious Justific

Re: how to build packages with a specific complier ?

2016-06-15 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 15/06/16 20:54, Eric Heintzmann wrote: > How can we debug with upstream, without any access to a 390x machine ? You can ask for an access to Debian Porter machine: https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi https://dsa.debian.org/doc/schroot/ But I am afraid that the hard part is to isolate the com

Bug#827383: RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0.1+ds-2 [RC] -- Factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method

2016-06-15 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Le 15/06/2016 à 23:12, Jerome BENOIT a écrit : > Hello Eric, > > On 15/06/16 20:57, Eric Heintzmann wrote: > > > > Le 15/06/2016 à 16:41, Jerome Benoit a écrit : > >> Package: sponsorship-requests > >> Severity: serious > >> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully > in t

Bug#827383: RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0.1+ds-2 [RC] -- Factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method

2016-06-15 Thread Jerome BENOIT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Eric, On 15/06/16 20:57, Eric Heintzmann wrote: > > > Le 15/06/2016 à 16:41, Jerome Benoit a écrit : >> Package: sponsorship-requests >> Severity: serious >> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the >> past)

Bug#827383: RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0.1+ds-2 [RC] -- Factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method

2016-06-15 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Le 15/06/2016 à 16:41, Jerome Benoit a écrit : > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > > Dear Sponsors, > > I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian package gmp-ecm [1], a > mathematical packa

Re: how to build packages with a specific complier ?

2016-06-15 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Le 15/06/2016 à 14:16, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > Hi, > >> It appears that some tests fail for one of my package (gmp-ecm) on one >> architecture (s390x): >> after some investigation, it appears that it is a compiler issue: building >> with gcc-6 (instead of gcc-5) >> causes no issue. So

Bug#827400: RFS: kadu/3.0-1.1 [NMU, RC]

2016-06-15 Thread Mateusz Łukasik
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kadu" * Package name: kadu Version : 3.0-1.1 Upstream Author : Kadu Team * URL : http://kadu.net * License : GPL-3 Section : net It

Bug#827398: RFS: pkg-kde-tools/0.15.21~bpo8+1

2016-06-15 Thread Mateusz Łukasik
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pkg-kde-tools" * Package name: pkg-kde-tools Version : 0.15.21~bpo8+1 Upstream Author : Copyright © 2007-2008 Sune Vuorela Copyright © 2007-2011 Modestas Vaini

Bug#827397: RFS: vlc/2.0.3-5+deb7u3

2016-06-15 Thread Mateusz Łukasik
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vlc" * Package name: vlc Version : 2.0.3-5+deb7u3 Upstream Author : 1996-2016 the VideoLAN Team * URL : videolan.org * License : LGPL 2.1 Section

Bug#827394: RFS: spacefm/1.0.5-2 [RC]

2016-06-15 Thread Mateusz Łukasik
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "spacefm" * Package name: spacefm Version : 1.0.5-2 Upstream Author : IgnorantGuru * URL : https://github.com/IgnorantGuru/spacefm * License : GPL-

Bug#827082: RFS: libredjackipset/1.1.1+20150311-1 [ITP] -- C library to store sets/maps of IP address

2016-06-15 Thread Roger Shimizu
Dear mentors, I just updated a bit, and here's the change: - remove useless build dependency: pandoc - add README.markdown as install target for both lib and lib-dev package All changes are pushed to branch pkg-test3 of my github: https://github.com/rogers0/libredjackipset Thank you and look

Bug#827383: marked as done (RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0.1+ds-2 [RC] -- Factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method)

2016-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Jun 2016 14:52:05 + (UTC) with message-id <669543560.6241828.1466002325552.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#827383: RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0.1+ds-2 [RC] -- Factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method has caused the Debian Bug report #827383, regard

Bug#820644: marked as done (RFS: libretro-snes9x [ITP])

2016-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Jun 2016 14:46:01 + (UTC) with message-id <579426058.6295644.1466001961429.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#820644: RFS: libretro-snes9x [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #820644, regarding RFS: libretro-snes9x [ITP] to be marked as done.

Bug#827383: RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0.1+ds-2 [RC] -- Factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method

2016-06-15 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Sponsors, I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian package gmp-ecm [1], a mathematical package. This release mainly works around an unisolated gc

Re: Restore Iceweasel branding

2016-06-15 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >Why do you think it would be useless? the "bug" is introduce with a stable-release-update, and should be fixed with another s-p-u fixing it with a backport means the user should be aware of the fix in another pocket, enable it, install it, and so on. I guess having both "issue" and "fix"

Bug#826169: marked as done (RFS: gpxsee/2.14 [ITP] -- GPX viewer and analyser)

2016-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Jun 2016 12:36:30 + (UTC) with message-id <1865871429.6093905.1465994190465.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#826169: RFS: gpxsee/2.14 [ITP] -- GPX viewer and analyser has caused the Debian Bug report #826169, regarding RFS: gpxsee/2.14 [ITP] --

Bug#827037: RFS: xpad/4.8.0-1 [ITA]

2016-06-15 Thread JCF Ploemen
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:01:19 +0900 Sean Whitton wrote: > I suggest that you continue installing AUTHORS and THANKS (if they > contain what I guess they contain) -- it's nice to include credits for > upstream's hard work. Thanks for your comment. As much as I understand the sentiment, I don't th

Re: how to build packages with a specific complier ?

2016-06-15 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >It appears that some tests fail for one of my package (gmp-ecm) on one >architecture (s390x): >after some investigation, it appears that it is a compiler issue: building >with gcc-6 (instead of gcc-5) >causes no issue. So now I want to impose the gcc-6 to d/rules ? What is the >best way to

how to build packages with a specific complier ?

2016-06-15 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Dear Forum: It appears that some tests fail for one of my package (gmp-ecm) on one architecture (s390x): after some investigation, it appears that it is a compiler issue: building with gcc-6 (instead of gcc-5) causes no issue. So now I want to impose the gcc-6 to d/rules ? What is the best way

Bug#827355: RFS: burp/1.4.40-1 [QA] -- Simple cross-platform network BackUp and Restore Program

2016-06-15 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! continuing over IRC :) On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 06:36:20PM +0900, Sean Whitton wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a QA upload of burp. > > * Package name: burp > Version : 1.

Bug#827355: RFS: burp/1.4.40-1 [QA] -- Simple cross-platform network BackUp and Restore Program

2016-06-15 Thread Sean Whitton
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a QA upload of burp. * Package name: burp Version : 1.4.40-1 Upstream Author : Graham Keeling * URL : http://burp.grke.net/ * License : AGPL-3 Section : utils Changes sin

Re: Bug#826169: RFS: gpxsee/2.14 [ITP] -- GPX viewer and analyser

2016-06-15 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:22:27AM +0200, Martin Tůma wrote: > Ok, thanks for the info. However as OBS does not provide Debian source > packages > and doing it extra manually is beyond my scope Please also note that maintaining a package in the official Debian archive means much more than writing