Bug#814859: RFS: runescape/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Set in a fantasy world of war, landscapes and sinister powers

Hi, Added the "metadata" in d/upstream Made to create a makefile. :/ but why? Sorry, I do not have programming skills in C and makefile. The source code is on github for those who want to improve it in the future. Thanks! Em 20-06-2016 10:34, Gianfranco Costamagna escreveu: Hi,

Bug#827037: RFS: xpad/4.8.0-1 [ITA]

Hi, I didn't have time to thank you for your work on this :-) I done just a little maintenance on xpad, so I'm very happy to see a new maintainer for it :-) Regards, Julien Lavergne 2016-06-22 8:30 GMT+02:00 Gianfranco Costamagna : > control: tags -1 pending > >>

Re: Becoming a Debian Maintainer - and behavior of DDs

[tl;dr: Richard is disappointed that I didn't advocate him for DM, while I did advocate other team members shortly after.] Hi Richard, Re: Richard B Winters 2016-06-22 <204e2c0e01254a766699d615036d2...@mail.mmogp.com> > During that time I worked with Christoph Berg, he advised not to play with

Bug#827933: RFS: yabar/0.4.0-1 [ITP]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yabar" * Package name: yabar Version : 0.4.0-1 Upstream Author : George Badawi * URL :

Becoming a Debian Maintainer - and behavior of DDs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, About 1.5-2 years ago I started working on Debian-HA. The project had been abandoned by Martin (as he works on other packages, and mainly Ubuntu last I recall), and I pursued getting involved and getting things started. I quickly got

Bug#827924: RFS: cplay/1.50-1 [QA] [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cplay" * Package name: cplay Version : 1.50-1 Upstream Author : Tomi Pieviläinen * URL : https://github.com/hukka/cplay * License

Bug#827700: RFS: cplay/1.50-1 [NMU]

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:10:37AM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > > I'm ccing them both, and a member of MIA team, even if I'm unsure about the > > MIA process for non DD people, > > MIA Team is also handling non-DD, so I'm on it already. BTW, the maintianer *is* a DD (the comaintainer is not).

Bug#827082: RFS: libredjackipset/1.1.1+20150311-1 [ITP] -- C library to store sets/maps of IP address

Hi Roger >> cat debian/libcorkipset-doc.docs >> build-*/docs/html > >Debian builds obj- by default. >So it seems to specify "--builddirectory=build" safe for both debian and >ubuntu. yes, but useless... maybe you didn't get completely the hint, but my guess was: remove the --builddirectory

Bug#827913: RFS: goto-chg/1.6-1 ITP

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "goto-chg" * Package name: goto-chg Version : 1.6-1 Upstream Author : David Andersson * Url :

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] C++ help needed for libsmithwaterman

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 03:04:06PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote: > > I'll see what I can do to add these things, I expect to push this > > later today or tomorrow. > > Later as in: "I just did it" :)  Muchas gracias. Thanks for the very quick help Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] C++ help needed for libsmithwaterman

Am Mittwoch, den 22.06.2016, 14:54 +0200 schrieb Gert Wollny: > I'll see what I can do to add these things, I expect to push this > later today or tomorrow. Later as in: "I just did it" :) 

Bug#827082: RFS: libredjackipset/1.1.1+20150311-1 [ITP] -- C library to store sets/maps of IP address

Dear G, Thanks for your review! I updated the package. On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 1:28 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >>So I used the same way in libcork to generate docs. >>Actually the upstream was during the transition from sphinx to pandoc. >>They removed sphinx

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] C++ help needed for libsmithwaterman

Hello Andreas,  Am Mittwoch, den 22.06.2016, 14:22 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi, > > I need to package libsmithwaterman[1] as a pre-pre-dependency for > some Debian Med package.  The code comes with a manually crafted > Makefile that simply creates an executable while the pre-depencency >

Re: C++ help needed for libsmithwaterman

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Neutron Soutmun wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > [snip] >> [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-med/libsmithwaterman.git > > It's broken, did you forget to push this repository

Re: C++ help needed for libsmithwaterman

Hi, On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: [snip] > [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-med/libsmithwaterman.git It's broken, did you forget to push this repository ? Best regards, Neutron Soutmun

C++ help needed for libsmithwaterman

Hi, I need to package libsmithwaterman[1] as a pre-pre-dependency for some Debian Med package. The code comes with a manually crafted Makefile that simply creates an executable while the pre-depencency of my package[2] needs a devel package (tries to include one of the contained headers

Bug#827907: RFS: evil/1.2.12-1 ITP

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "evil" * Package name: evil Version : 1.2.12-1 Upstream Author : Vegard Øye * Url : https://bitbucket.org/lyro/evil/wiki/Home *

Bug#827037: marked as done (RFS: xpad/4.8.0-1 [ITA])

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:59:22 + (UTC) with message-id <1133882683.12649633.1466589562925.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#827037: RFS: xpad/4.8.0-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #827037, regarding RFS: xpad/4.8.0-1 [ITA] to be marked as done.

Bug#827037: RFS: xpad/4.8.0-1 [ITA]

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:30:23AM +0200, JCF Ploemen wrote: > ps: please do cc me on replies, as the bts doesn't keep bug submitters > in the loop automagically. If you subscribe to debian-mentors@lists.debian.org you'll get all the messages. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP

Bug#827037: RFS: xpad/4.8.0-1 [ITA]

> imagemagick and libmagickcore-extra, can you please provide a > rationale for their removal? these were only there because of 'convert' in d/rules, used for creating an xpm (in turn needed for menu support) out of the upstream svg icon. With all that gone, the build-deps had become useless,

Bug#827895: RFS: lua-torch-nn/0~20160604-gd23a8f5+dfsg-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-torch-nn" * Package name: lua-torch-nn Version : 0~20160604-gd23a8f5+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Torch devs * URL

Bug#827700: RFS: cplay/1.50-1 [NMU]

Hi Gianfranco, On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 06:54:38AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > well, the package hasn't been touched in over a decade, so I presume > it might be fine to upload the fixes in deferred/15, even as NMU. > I guess they had *all* the time to refactor the package, and update

Re: Bug#827700: RFS: cplay/1.50-1 [NMU]

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 06:54:38AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > >The changes I have quoted above are not usually appropriate for NMUs. > > > >In this case, it looks like those package maintainers are inactive (no > >uploads since 2005). You should contact the MIA team to have the >

Bug#827887: marked as done (RFS: burp/1.4.40-2 [QA] -- Simple cross-platform network BackUp and Restore Program)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Jun 2016 07:06:52 + (UTC) with message-id <306714397.12316497.1466579212677.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#827887: RFS: burp/1.4.40-2 [QA] -- Simple cross-platform network BackUp and Restore Program has caused the Debian Bug report #827887,

Bug#827700: RFS: cplay/1.50-1 [NMU]

Hi, >The changes I have quoted above are not usually appropriate for NMUs. >In particular, changing from a version 1.0 to a 3.0 source package could >annoy the current package maintainers a great deal. > >In this case, it looks like those package maintainers are inactive (no >uploads since 2005).

Re: Bug#827487: bytes-circle_2.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Sean, >I think that we should avoid thinking that one purpose of source-only >uploads is to deal with DDs and DMs intentionally subverting security by >means of dodgy binaries. We already place a great deal of trust in >those who can upload packages, and it doesn't make sense to say that,

Bug#827037: RFS: xpad/4.8.0-1 [ITA]

control: tags -1 pending > control: tag -1 +confirmed Hi Sean, thanks for the really nice review! I did sponsor on deferred/5, because I would like to have a feedback about the following >+ remove build-depends on libgtk2.0-dev, libmagickcore-extra, > autotools-dev, imagemagick.

Bug#827887: RFS: burp/1.4.40-2 [QA] -- Simple cross-platform network BackUp and Restore Program

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload of burp. * Package name: burp Version : 1.4.40-2 Upstream Author : Graham Keeling * URL : http://burp.grke.net/ * License : AGPL-3