Your message dated Sat, 02 Jul 2016 04:28:57 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: pkg-kde-tools/0.15.21~bpo8+1
has caused the Debian Bug report #827398,
regarding RFS: pkg-kde-tools/0.15.21~bpo8+1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 03:06:41AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> > 2. evil-paredit.el declares a dependency on paredit version "25beta".
> >But we have version 24 in Debian.[1] Have you tested that it works with
> >paredit 24? I have noticed that the current generation of Elisp
>
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 01:03:01AM +, Felix Krull wrote:
> I must say I'm a bit confused about how the Developer Reference
> suggests to "concentrate on describing significant and user-visible
> changes," but the informal advice I've heard on changelog entries was
> always to be very de
Thanks for the reviews!
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 at 15:23 Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> please try to be more verbose in changelog:
> >bump std-version (maybe extract in a new changelog entry)
>
>
> copyright in machine readable format
>
I'm not sure what you mean by that? But I extended the change
On 07/02/2016 02:45 AM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> I need pause utility to keep gpg-agent in foreground:
> gpg-agent --use-standard-socket --daemon ./pause
>
> Something like following C program:
>
> #include
>
> int main (void)
> {
> return pause();
> }
>
>
Hello!
I need pause utility to keep gpg-agent in foreground:
gpg-agent --use-standard-socket --daemon ./pause
Something like following C program:
#include
int main (void)
{
return pause();
}
Is there any standard utility for it?
`apt-file find
On Friday, July 01 2016, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>> 1. In d/copyright, the license should be called "Expat" not "MIT" since
>>"MIT" is ambiguous between several different licenses.
>
> Is it true? AFAIC, there are 3 versions of BSD (2,3,4 clauses) and only
> one MIT.
Debian uses Expat instead o
> 1. In d/copyright, the license should be called "Expat" not "MIT" since
>"MIT" is ambiguous between several different licenses.
Is it true? AFAIC, there are 3 versions of BSD (2,3,4 clauses) and only
one MIT.
> 2. evil-paredit.el declares a dependency on paredit version "25beta".
>But
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'd like to get a few changes I've made to newlisp uploaded. They
basically fix two bugs: 828805 and 828806.
The changes are:
- Support GNU/kFreeBSD builds (by creating the necessary makefiles and
adjusting source files accordingly), and
-
control: owner -1 !
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Hello Dmitry,
Here is a preliminary review (haven't tried installing and using yet,
due to item (2) below).
1. In d/copyright, the license should be called "Expat" not "MIT" since
"MIT" is ambiguous between several different licenses.
2. evil-par
Hi Gianfranco
Thanks for the mail ( and sorry for not replying sooner).
--I have fixed the pedantic issues
-- I have not yet found a clear solution to the embedded jquery issue. I
found information on
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736360 which seems to
suggest the problem
Your message dated Fri, 1 Jul 2016 17:37:00 + (UTC)
with message-id <220108816.781479.1467394620547.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#829256: RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-2 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #829256,
regarding RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-2 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC:
locutusofb...@debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "caffe"
* Package name: caffe
Version : 1.0.0~rc3-2
Upstream Author :
Berkeley Vision and Learning Center
* URL
Your message dated Fri, 1 Jul 2016 16:16:26 + (UTC)
with message-id <348257725.761398.1467389786284.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#829253: RFS: pyzo/4.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #829253,
regarding RFS: pyzo/4.2.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyzo"
* Package name: pyzo
Version : 4.2.1-1
Upstream Author : Almar Klein
* URL : http://www.pyzo.org/
* License : BSD
Section : science
It bu
this shouldn't be a big issue, just introduce a python3 package, gets it in new
queue
and ask a removal of the old python2 cruft package.
Until this is only in experimental we can just don't care.
G.
Il Venerdì 1 Luglio 2016 17:30, Lumin ha scritto:
Control: close -1
OK, I'm checking the
Control: close -1
OK, I'm checking the difference between -1 and HEAD now.
Will open another RFS for -2.
It's my fault that I didn't perform any mentors upload after
I started the python3 transition ... So the mentors package
keeps old ...
On 1 July 2016 at 15:19, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
we can't as said before.
Il Venerdì 1 Luglio 2016 17:12, Lumin ha scritto:
Control: reopen -1
Give me five minutes and about 5 minutes to mentors,
Can we overwrite the -1 version ...
There are too many changes between -1 and -2 ...
On 1 July 2016 at 15:06, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote
Control: reopen -1
Give me five minutes and about 5 minutes to mentors,
Can we overwrite the -1 version ...
There are too many changes between -1 and -2 ...
On 1 July 2016 at 15:06, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> ETOOLATE
>
> >Well ... I'm somewhat confused by how old the uploaded package is
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "open-isns"
* Package name: open-isns
Version : 0.96-1
Upstream Author : Lee Duncan
* URL : https://github.com/open-iscsi/ope
ETOOLATE
>Well ... I'm somewhat confused by how old the uploaded package is ... it still
>builds python2 ...
>I'll comment octave package out and do a quick build, the package lying in NEW
>should be overwriten by the coming updated package.
please give me a fixed -2, and I'll upload it on ex
Your message dated Fri, 1 Jul 2016 14:56:25 + (UTC)
with message-id <1528960795.673644.1467384985948.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#829233: RFS: mailfilter/0.8.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #829233,
regarding RFS: mailfilter/0.8.4-2
to be marked as done.
This me
Well ... I'm somewhat confused by how old the uploaded package is ... it
still builds python2 ...
I'll comment octave package out and do a quick build, the package lying in
NEW should be overwriten by the coming updated package.
binary:caffe-cpu is NEW.
binary:caffe-doc is NEW.
binary:libcaffe-cpu
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mailfilter"
Package name: mailfilter
Version : 0.8.4-2
Upstream Author : Andreas Bauer
URL : http://mailfilter.sourceforge.net
License : GPL-2+ with OpenSSL ex
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "evil-paredit-el"
* Package name: evil-paredit-el
Version : 0.0.2-1
Upstream Author : Roman Gonzalez
* Url : https://github.com/roman/evil-paredit
* Licenses
Your message dated Fri, 1 Jul 2016 12:54:59 + (UTC)
with message-id <1005726574.511456.1467377699970.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line caffe: sponsored
has caused the Debian Bug report #823140,
regarding RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- a deep learning framework [ITP]
to be marked as don
Hi,
>Is experimental available for this purpose?
it is, I'm uploading shortly, I did a dget
changed unstable to experimental in changelog, and if everything is good I'll
upload
BTW skimage didn't migrate
https://packages.qa.debian.org/s/skimage.html
I would prefer to avoid overriding of the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for this update of "btrfs-progs". I have
chosen to update to v4.5.3, because this version does not trigger a
bug when combined with linux-4.6.x as discussed in the following
email:
https://www.spinics.net/lis
Your message dated Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:53:14 + (UTC)
with message-id <1127550484.432496.1467373994051.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#827907: RFS: evil/1.2.12-1 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #827907,
regarding RFS: evil/1.2.12-1 ITP
to be marked as done.
This mean
* Sean Whitton , 2016-07-01, 08:13:
I would be grateful, Jakub, if you could try the build on your sbuild
config before I file a bug against sbuild suggesting this be the
default. The repo, for your convenience:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/evil-el
Why .orig.tar from pristi
On Fri, 2016-07-01 at 08:13 +, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:24:51PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > * Dmitry Bogatov , 2016-06-30, 22:28:
> > > * default configuration of pbuilder do not provide possibility to
> > > allocate
> > > pty
> >
> > Sounds like a bug in pbuilder.
> >
Your message dated Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:46:51 + (UTC)
with message-id <1978861479.428643.1467373611140.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#828889: RFS: elisp-slime-nav-el/0.9-1 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #828889,
regarding RFS: elisp-slime-nav-el/0.9-1 ITP
to be mark
control: tag -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
control: noowner -1
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 12:11:35PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> Added Forwarded: header at bootom of description. It works. If I add it at
> top,
> it will be lost during patch->commit->patch conversion.
Okay. I think that fails
control: owner -1 !
Hi,
>You might consider re-running dch -r to refresh the timestamp in the
>changelog so it lies after all our changes.
and ping when ready :)
G.
control: noowner -1
control: tag -1 +confirmed -moreinfo
Hello Dmitry,
My apologies for wasting your time -- I can't reproduce it now.
I added a "Forwarded: not-needed" header and I think we're done here :)
Thank you for your time. The only thing I couldn't test is a clean
build in pbuilder/sbu
> > > Thanks for your response. I think this package is almost ready. Please
> > > add Forwarded: headers to the patches based on our discussion.
> > Is it any wat to get best of 'gbp pq' and dep3?
> I generally resort to using quilt :(
Added Forwarded: header at bootom of description. It works.
> > > > > Nice work. Have you forwarded the fix upstream?
> > > > Too much trouble. To fix it upstream, they have to deal with either:
> > > > * evil mode is autoloaded, interactive and with sane description.
> > > > Ugliness
> > > >in code.
> >
> > > Do you know whether the problem if Deb
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:28:13PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> I elaborated this solution and pushed to master. Following is true:
>
> * `make test < /dev/null' fails
> * `dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc < /dev/null' is success now. (see 16d89)
> * 'dtach' uses pty(7)
> * default configur
Your message dated Fri, 1 Jul 2016 07:05:31 + (UTC)
with message-id <208950607.170393.1467356731173.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#829120: RFS: python-hdf5storage/0.1.13-2 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #829120,
regarding RFS: python-hdf5storage/0.1.13-2 [RC]
to
Your message dated Fri, 1 Jul 2016 07:04:32 + (UTC)
with message-id <1905066908.151340.1467356672971.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#829117: RFS: groonga/6.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #829117,
regarding RFS: groonga/6.0.5-1
to be marked as done.
This means th
40 matches
Mail list logo
