Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Control: block 818617 by -1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for an NMU of img2pdf, fixing a stretch RC
bug (older than 7 days and no maintainer activity, and maintainer is
LowNMU).
I have verified this NMU in the following ways:
- fixes
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "glances"
* Package name: glances
* Version : 2.6.2-2
* Upstream Author : Nicolas Hennion (aka) Nicolargo
* URL : https://github.com/nicolargo/glances
* License
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 11:27:06AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>
> > > Relaxed dependency. Works for me.
> > I had at upstream's commit history and it seems that they have added
> > compatibility code so that it works with various versions of paredit.
>
> Which commit?
86d8ab33c, 6eea86
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 11:27:06AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> > You should definitely forward the dependency relaxation upstream: they
> > shouldn't be declaring so tight a dependency if they have the
> > compatibility code.
>
> It is not problem for MELPA, melpa ships 25beta. Who woul
On Saturday, July 02 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> I agree with your POV, lets see Andrey's opinion, I'm fine with the changes
> now :)
Thanks for the review, Gianfranco. If I may, I'd like to propose that
you upload the package as-is by the end of tomorrow (Sunday) even if
Andrey doesn'
you were lucky I used deferred.
dcutting and reuploading.
G.
On Saturday 02 July 2016 19:51:07 Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Hi, the package looks good.
>
> uploaded, now that stormlib-listfiles is on its way for unstable (new
> queue)
>
> G.
Now I'm just updated smpq package on mentors.debian.net. I moved
libstorm-listfiles from Depends: to Reco
Hi,
>Hm, this is actually only needed for GNU/kFreeBSD, which uses -lncurses
>on the linking phase. I updated Build-Depends to reflect that.
wonderful
>Yeah, it was just a simple sed command to remove things from all
>Makefiles. But it seems I did not specify the right set of files to
>appl
Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2016 19:46:03 +0200
with message-id <5777fddb.2030...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#819396: RFS: smpq/1.5-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #819396,
regarding RFS: smpq/1.5-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2016 19:42:28 +0200
with message-id <5777fd04.6040...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#814865: RFS: helm-synth/0.6.2-3 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #814865,
regarding RFS: helm-synth/0.6.6-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2016 19:43:01 +0200
with message-id <5777fd25.9020...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#818227: RFS: kawa/2.1-1 [ITP] -- Scheme implementation
for the JVM
has caused the Debian Bug report #818227,
regarding RFS: kawa/2.1-1 [ITP] -- Scheme implementation for the JVM
Hi,
gpvdm ping
(I wrote a review on the bug, months ago)
G.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2016 19:40:44 +0200
with message-id <5777fc9c.6040...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#816880: RFS: ctmg/1.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #816880,
regarding RFS: ctmg/1.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Saturday, July 02 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>I'd like to get a few changes I've made to newlisp uploaded. They
>
>>basically fix two bugs: 828805 and 828806.
>>
>>The changes are:
>>
>>- Support GNU/kFreeBSD builds (by creating the necessary makefiles and
control: tags -1 moreinfo
control: owner -1 !
Hi,
lets see
>found information on
>https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736360 which seems to
>suggest the problem was still contentious two years ago. Should I keep
>overriding this warning?
I suggest to leave things as is
1) apt i
Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2016 17:04:29 + (UTC)
with message-id <376828262.1366648.1467479069949.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#828166: RFS: speedcrunch/0.11-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #828166,
regarding RFS: speedcrunch/0.11-1 [ITA]
to be marked as do
Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2016 16:51:45 + (UTC)
with message-id <732265313.1345310.1467478305420.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#819395: RFS: stormlib-listfiles/2015-04-20-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #819395,
regarding RFS: stormlib-listfiles/0~20150420-
Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2016 16:44:26 + (UTC)
with message-id <747722351.1323338.1467477866277.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#825532: RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.6+20160526+ds-1
[ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #825532,
regarding RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.7
Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2016 16:31:45 + (UTC)
with message-id <1723375344.1329501.1467477105362.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#829012: RFS: udftools/1.2-0.1 [NMU] [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #829012,
regarding RFS: udftools/1.2-1 [NMU] [RC]
to be marked
Control: retitle -1 RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.7+20160630+ds-1 [ITP]
Dear G,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
>
>>Way 1:
>>Since all manpages is created by Max (co-maintainer of this package,
>>and in CC list), we can ask him to relicense, according to [2]
>>
>>[2] h
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gntp-send"
* Package name: gntp-send
Version : 0.3.4-1
Upstream Author : Yasuhiro Matsumoto
Peter Sinnott
Dither
* URL
- This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. -
We have a Customer Service Survey Assignment in your location.We will pay $200
per assignment which would come in the form of a cashiers check along with
comprehensive details in regards to your assignment. Kindly
CLICK HERE
Ok, I added description about generation of files in README.source file.
New package is uploaded on mentors.debian.net
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I updated udftools package, new version is on mentors.debian.net. Let me
know if it is OK now.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
* Dmitry Bogatov , 2016-07-02, 03:45:
#include
int main (void)
{
return pause();
}
Is there any standard utility for it?
$ perl -MPOSIX -e pause
--
Jakub Wilk
> >I expect tail -f /dev/null to be close enough in behavior to
> >pause(3), even though it does something else internally.
> yes, indeed even if it might be not the best in efficiency [1]
> somebody suggested "sleep inf" or "sleep infinity".
Also great. But some implementations of sleep do not
> > I need pause utility to keep gpg-agent in foreground:
> > gpg-agent --use-standard-socket --daemon ./pause
> >=20
> > Something like following C program:
> >=20
> > #include
> >=20
> > int main (void)
> > {
> > return pause();
> > }
> >=20
> > Is there any standard
> >> 1. In d/copyright, the license should be called "Expat" not "MIT" since
> >>"MIT" is ambiguous between several different licenses.
> >
> > Is it true? AFAIC, there are 3 versions of BSD (2,3,4 clauses) and only
> > one MIT.
> Debian uses Expat instead of MIT. There are unfortunately man
Hi,
>I expect tail -f /dev/null to be close enough in behavior to
>pause(3), even though it does something else internally.
yes, indeed even if it might be not the best in efficiency [1]
somebody suggested "sleep inf" or "sleep infinity".
[1]
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/42901/ho
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I'd like to get a few changes I've made to newlisp uploaded. They
>basically fix two bugs: 828805 and 828806.
>
>The changes are:
>
>- Support GNU/kFreeBSD builds (by creating the necessary makefiles and
> adjusting source files accordingly), and
>
>- Do not use -m32
> > Relaxed dependency. Works for me.
> I had at upstream's commit history and it seems that they have added
> compatibility code so that it works with various versions of paredit.
Which commit?
> You should definitely forward the dependency relaxation upstream: they
> shouldn't be declaring so
31 matches
Mail list logo
