Bug#830160: marked as done (RFS: arc-theme/20160605-2)

Your message dated Thu, 7 Jul 2016 04:32:04 +0200 with message-id <20160707023204.ga12...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#830160: RFS: arc-theme/20160605-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #830160, regarding RFS: arc-theme/20160605-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Re: pbuilder error

Hi Christian >On actual package files or just the "Packages" / "Contents" >files while pbuilder is doing "apt-get update"? If it's the >latter, that problem should not exist anymore for stretch >and/or sid (search "by-hash" in that email): >

Bug#815791: RFS: gtranscribe/0.3-1 [ITP] -- simple GTK+ tool focussed on easy transcription of spoken words

Hi Paul, thanks for your patience and all your testing effort! On 06.07.2016 at 15:17, Paul Wise wrpte: > On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Philip Rinn wrote: > >> http://mentors.debian.net/package/gtranscribe > > I'm still finding it easy to cause segfaults. If I try to play a file > a second

Re: pbuilder error

ok. thanks for your valuable help. I could solve this issue running. pbuilder clean and the error is gone. Best regards, Elías Alejandro On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 07/06/2016 06:55 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Sometimes I'm

Bug#830160: RFS: arc-theme/20160605-2

package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arc-theme" * Package name: arc-theme Version : 20160605-2 Upstream Author : horst3180 * URL : https://github.com/horst3180/arc-theme * License

Re: pbuilder error

On 07/06/2016 06:55 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Sometimes I'm behind a proxy, and I get a *lot* of hash sum mismatches > when using pbuilder/sbuild. On actual package files or just the "Packages" / "Contents" files while pbuilder is doing "apt-get update"? If it's the latter, that problem

Re: Bug#829605: RFS: aspell-sk/2.02-0-0.1 [RC, NMU]

Am Mittwoch, den 06.07.2016, 09:33 +0200 schrieb Tobias Frost: > Some time ago a dh extension has Bern made for aspell dictinaries > which should help. Take a look at aspell-it. (Im currently on the > road so I cannot check if this also applies to this package and it > was Quote long ago Ehen I

Re: pbuilder error

Hi, >It appears your libfakeroot_1.21-1_i386.deb is corrupt, the >download somehow didn't work properly. Try deleting >$APTCACHE/libfakeroot_1.21-1_i386.deb, where $APTCACHE is the >value of the variable in your pbuilderrc (defaults to >/var/cache/pbuilder/aptcache) and trying again. (It should

Re: pbuilder error

On 07/06/2016 06:25 PM, Elías Alejandro wrote: > Unpacking libfakeroot:i386 (1.21-1) ... > dpkg-deb (subprocess): decompressing archive member: lzma error: > compressed data is corrupt > dpkg-deb: error: subprocess returned error exit status 2 > dpkg: error processing archive >

pbuilder error

Hi all, Yesterday and today I was trying to build my package however I get an error. I've updated pbuilder tarball with 'update' but it seems no works. Package: pbuilder Version: 0.225.1 If you know any answer please cc'me. Thanks in advance. Best regards. Elías Alejandro

Bug#829456: RFS: jquery-throttle-debounce/1.1+dfsg.1-1

On 05-Jul-2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > ping back when happy with your changes :) I have uploaded a new release, still named “1.1+dfsg.1-1”, to . This removes the non-source file you found. Please let me know whether this

Bug#815791: RFS: gtranscribe/0.3-1 [ITP] -- simple GTK+ tool focussed on easy transcription of spoken words

On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Philip Rinn wrote: > http://mentors.debian.net/package/gtranscribe I'm still finding it easy to cause segfaults. If I try to play a file a second time I always get a segfault. Some other things. I get a GTK+ error when starting it on the command-line: $

Bug#829692: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor

* Gianfranco Costamagna , 2016-07-06, 10:27: As per Developer's Reference §5.11.1 this should have been uploaded to DELAYED/10 at least. Also, the NMU diff should be sent to BTS before the package is uploaded. In general you are right, but in this case upstream and

Bug#829605: RFS: aspell-sk/2.02-0-0.1 [RC, NMU]

* Pali Rohár , 2016-07-05, 14:28: debian/copyright says that the package "was downloaded from ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/sk/;, but there is no 2.02-0 at this location. I mentioned this because it's a serious violation of Policy §12.5: “the copyright file must say

Bug#829692: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor

Hi, >As per Developer's Reference §5.11.1 this should have been uploaded to >DELAYED/10 at least. In general you are right, but in this case upstream and Debian maintainers seems to be the same people, and they acked the other NMUs in a matter of minutes.

Re: symbols file handling Was: Bug#829692: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor

Hi >So yes, I believe that's ABI compatible as well. thanks for confirming! >(Also, the fact that upstream uses symbol versioning, and uses >it correctly, indicates to me that they understand this, and this >gives me confidence in that they are unlikely to screw up when it >comes to

Re: symbols file handling Was: Bug#829692: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor

On 07/06/2016 11:30 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Basically, the debdiff is not showing ABI incompatible changes > (please double check, I'm really far from being expert) Changes in the header files: - u2fh_rc (return code for lots of functions) got an additional enum value, but the

Re: symbols file handling Was: Bug#829692: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor

* Gianfranco Costamagna , 2016-07-06, 08:36: - u2fh_check_version@U2F_HOST_0.0 0.0 + u2fh_check_version@U2F_HOST_0.0 1.0 The changelog for this package didn't help me understand what's going on, so I'll answer in general: A change like this does look suspicious,

Bug#829692: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor

The full changelog was: * Non-maintainer upload. * New upstream version 1.1.2 (2016-06-22) * Use compile-time hardening * Use HTTPS for Vcs-Git * Update and fix the symbols file. * Fix the copyright file. On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 01:59:59PM +0200, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: The proper

Re: symbols file handling Was: Bug#829692: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor

Hi Christian, thanks for the help and answer! I admit it looked wrong to me too, but your explanation is perfect! so, I would have changed the symbols file in this way: libu2f-host.so.0 libu2f-host0 #MINVER# U2F_HOST_0.0@U2F_HOST_0.0 0.0 + U2F_HOST_1.1@U2F_HOST_1.1 1.1.2

Bug#829205: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.5.3-0.1

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, >Have you coordinated with Dimitri? When the regular maintainer is active, >NMUs are appropriate for urgent changes, not for regular work. Ie, instead >of random sponsors, I'd suggest letting him do uploads. > >As you've helped with this

Re: symbols file handling Was: Bug#829692: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor

On 07/06/2016 10:36 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > all the symbols have been updated: > e.g. > > [snip] > > - u2fh_check_version@U2F_HOST_0.0 0.0 > > + u2fh_check_version@U2F_HOST_0.0 1.0 That's a change in the minimum version of the symbol, but not the symbol name itself (that's still the

Bug#829454: RFS: xkcdpass/1.6.3-1

Hi, >> your package doesn't support arch:all builds... "dpkg-buildpackage -A" <-- this is broken, and your package didn't build on debian buildd systems https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=xkcdpass=unstable this requires a fix or a new binary upload (I'm a fan of source only

Bug#829692: marked as done (RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor)

Your message dated Wed, 6 Jul 2016 08:36:39 + (UTC) with message-id <170559703.4473042.1467794199458.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line symbols file handling Was: Bug#829692: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor has caused the Debian Bug report

symbols file handling Was: Bug#829692: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor

Hi, >Appears to be good, uploaded. >Thanks for your work! thanks for sponsoring, I looked at the package, but I didn't have time to look properly at it and reply here :) I admit I'm a little bit lost on this change (my fault! to be clear, this is why I'm redirecting to -mentors mail list)

Bug#830100: marked as done (RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.7+20160630+ds-2 [RC])

Your message dated Wed, 6 Jul 2016 08:30:29 + (UTC) with message-id <971443200.4431193.1467793829343.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#830100: RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.7+20160630+ds-2 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #830100, regarding RFS:

Bug#824967: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.2.5-1 [ITP]

Hi Gianfranco, good to hear from you! Many thanks for your feedback. control: > description should be extended a lot Have made the descriptions more meaningful > some build-dependencies might be useless, did you check that? e.g. dh-buildinfo > intltool (note: I'm not checking the above) >

Re: Bug#829605: RFS: aspell-sk/2.02-0-0.1 [RC, NMU]

Some time ago a dh extension has Bern made for aspell dictinaries which should help. Take a look at aspell-it. (Im currently on the road so I cannot check if this also applies to this package and it was Quote long ago Ehen I worked aspell-it) Am 6. Juli 2016 01:21:32 GMT+02:00, schrieb Adam

Bug#829205: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.5.3-0.1

Hi! On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 08:16:14AM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for this update of "btrfs-progs". Have you coordinated with Dimitri? When the regular maintainer is active, NMUs are appropriate for urgent changes, not for regular work. Ie, instead of random

Bug#829151: RFS: setcolortemperature/1.1-1 ITP

On 07/05/2016 08:02 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tag -1 +moreinfo > > Dear Jacob, > > This looks like a nice alternative to redshift-gtk. Thanks for > packaging it. I can't sponsor the upload, but I hope this review is > useful to you. Thanks! The review definitely

Bug#829454: RFS: xkcdpass/1.6.3-1

On Tue, 2016-07-05 18:14 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > your package doesn't support arch:all builds... I'm not sure what you mean. The ‘debian/control’ file declares , in the only binary

Bug#829151: RFS: setcolortemperature/1.1-1 ITP

Hello Peter and Jacob, On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 11:19:55PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Actually I don't see a problem with the machine-readable copyright > specification here; if you're referring to the fact that the contents > of the "Copyright" field is not in the usual "list of " > format,

Bug#829151: RFS: setcolortemperature/1.1-1 ITP

On 07/05/2016 07:46 PM, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello Peter and Jacob, > > On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 11:19:55PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: >> Actually I don't see a problem with the machine-readable copyright >> specification here; if you're referring to the fact that the contents >> of the

Bug#829692: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 01:59:59PM +0200, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for a NMU to the package libu2f-host. > > * Package name: libu2f-host >Version : 1.1.2-0.1 > The proper maintainer of the package seems unresponsive, and 2 RC bugs > (FTBFS)

Bug#830100: RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.7+20160630+ds-2 [RC]

package: sponsorship-requests severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: rogershim...@gmail.com, max.c...@gmail.com, 073p...@gmail.com Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shadowsocks-libev" * Package name: shadowsocks-libev Version : 2.4.7+20160630+ds-2 Upstream

Bug#829151: RFS: setcolortemperature/1.1-1 ITP

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 12:02:53PM +, Sean Whitton wrote: [snip] > 8. This doesn't make sense (doesn't follow DEP-5 machine-readable >copyright file format) -- please check: > > Files: sct.c > Copyright: 2016 Ted Unangst >whitepoints data copyright