Bug#830827: RFS: wvstreams/4.6.1-9 [QA, RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "wvstreams"  * Package name: wvstreams    Version : 4.6.1-9    Upstream Author : Net Integration Technologies Inc. et al.   * URL :

Bug#829151: RFS: setcolortemperature/1.1-1 ITP

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 05:13:22PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > src:setcolortemperature > binary: sct > > please choose one, and use the same, you can't usually expect users to install > a package and expect a binary called in another way. > > I seem to be pedantic, but I really like to

Bug#829151: RFS: setcolortemperature/1.1-1 ITP

Hi, >K == Kelvin, not kilo. this is what happens when one person is not using google :) thanks you all! G.

Bug#829151: RFS: setcolortemperature/1.1-1 ITP

* Gianfranco Costamagna , 2016-07-11, 17:13: are you sure it is 6500K? 6500K should be equal to "650" K == Kelvin, not kilo. -- Jakub Wilk

Bug#829151: RFS: setcolortemperature/1.1-1 ITP

On 11 Jul 2016 19:18, "Gianfranco Costamagna" wrote: > > Hi, > > >This has been fixed. Now when -h is passed usage is printed and if the > > >temperature passed is wrong usage will also be printed. > > > I still see nothing when called with no parameters :) > > (well you

Bug#829151: RFS: setcolortemperature/1.1-1 ITP

Hi, >This has been fixed. Now when -h is passed usage is printed and if the >temperature passed is wrong usage will also be printed. I still see nothing when called with no parameters :) (well you might print something like "temperature reset to the default value (65K) or similar) BTW If no

Re: How to upgrade my gpg key to debian standards?

On Sun, 2016-07-10 at 18:39 -0400, Paul Elliott wrote: > I am looking at upgrading my gpg key. > > What parameters should I use? [1] has a guide which options to use to make sure that you use strong hashes for the (self-)signatures on your key.  I'm not sure if GnuPG upstream has changed their

Bug#830682: marked as done (RFS: engauge-digitizer/8.3-1)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:43:14 + (UTC) with message-id <486149716.1690997.1468248194305.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#830682: RFS: engauge-digitizer/8.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #830682, regarding RFS: engauge-digitizer/8.3-1 to be marked as

Re: Call for review: Improving RFS template for mentors.debian.net

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 10:23 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: >>> Collect 'QA upload.' information by debianqa plugin >>> https://github.com/debexpo/debexpo/pull/42 > > Um, that's... unusual way to search for a string. Have you tried using regular expressions? :) > > Or alternatively,

Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ifstat" here we are sir >More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com. interesting website, indeed! > * Update to debhelper version 9 (Closes: #817499, #828348). > * Add

Re: pbuilder error

Hi, >H. I see your fixbadproxy config being copied, so I wonder whats up, >but its quite obvious that the options didn't take effect at all as, as >mentioned (in the quote), the first two are very noisy. interestingly enough, it works on my machine, but it doesn't under pbuilder chroots,

Re: Call for review: Improving RFS template for mentors.debian.net

HI, >>Thank you for feedback. >>But I hadn't ever seen such tag. >>https://mentors.debian.net/sponsor/rfs-howto > >There's no standard tag for this, and I don't think we need one. > >If there's no tag in the subject, then the upload is supposed to be >"regular". I bet to disagree sir :) I

Bug#830788: RFS: ifstat/1.1-9

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ifstat" Package name: ifstat Version : 1.1-9 Upstream Author : Gal Roualland URL : http://gael.roualland.free.fr/ifstat/ License

Re: How to upgrade my gpg key to debian standards?

Hi, >I am looking at upgrading my gpg key. > >What parameters should I use? > >Is there a standard way to get all the people that signed >the old key to sign the new key? some general answering should tell that it is up to the developers to sign the new one, or ask you to meet in person.

Bug#830711: marked as done (RFS: adabrowse/4.0.3-7)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:23:46 +0200 with message-id <20160711092346.GA4264@pegase> and subject line RFS: adabrowse/4.0.3-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #830711, regarding RFS: adabrowse/4.0.3-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Re: How to upgrade my gpg key to debian standards?

On 2016-07-10 at 22:53:46 +, Sean Whitton wrote: > - https://debian-administration.org/users/dkg/weblog/48 > - https://help.riseup.net/en/security/message-security/openpgp/best-practices > - the hopenpgp-tools package to check your key -- very useful! I would also recommend:

Bug#830756: RFS: minetest-mod-animals (ITP)

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "minetest-mod-animals" * Package name: minetest-mod-animals Version : 2.5.0-1 Upstream Author : sapier * URL : https://github.com/sapier/animals_modpack

Bug#830753: RFS: minetest-mod-animalmaterials (ITP)

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "minetest-mod-animalmaterials" * Package name: minetest-mod-animalmaterials Version : 0.1.3-1 Upstream Author : sapier * URL :