Bug#830885: marked as done (RFS: skiboot/5.2.4-1 update)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2016 04:26:41 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: skiboot/5.2.4-1 update has caused the Debian Bug report #830885, regarding RFS: skiboot/5.2.4-1 update to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#829151: marked as done (RFS: setcolortemperature/1.3-1 ITP)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2016 04:26:41 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: setcolortemperature/1.3-1 ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #829151, regarding RFS: setcolortemperature/1.3-1 ITP to be marked as done. This means that you

Re: more recent version with python3 support

Hi Herbert, On 12 July 2016 at 16:46, Herbert Fortes wrote: > This new version has support for python3, as > said in setup.py, so I created debian/*.install > files and edited debian/control and debian/rules. What are the contents of "debian/*.install" files? I have packaged a

libgdbm transition

Hello! Some time ago I made gdbm_1.12-3 into experimental, and since it is incompatible with gdbm-1.8 (new soname, separated compat library) I rebuilt all reverse depedencies. Here is my report: FAIL camldbm_1.0-2.dsc | PATCH FAIL courier_0.73.1-1.6.dsc FAIL

Re: more recent version with python3 support

Hi people, I am doing a QA (do not need a sponsor) and packaging a more recent version of the app. This new version has support for python3, as said in setup.py, so I created debian/*.install files and edited debian/control and debian/rules. cat debian/rules: #!/usr/bin/make -f %: dh

Bug#830885: RFS: skiboot/5.2.4-1 update

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, Gianfranco, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "skiboot". This is a packaging update : skiboot (5.2.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release * Disabled PIE build as this makes opal-prd segfault and there is

Bug#830569: RFS: z3/4.4.1-0.1 [NMU] [4xRC]

Any reason why your .orig.tar is different than the one uscan downloads? $ md5sum z3_4.4.1.orig.tar.gz* 94e21f86056f986c320653912be53f8a z3_4.4.1.orig.tar.gz 4336a9df24f090e711c6d42fd4e2b1fc z3_4.4.1.orig.tar.gz.github * Fabian Wolff , 2016-07-10, 00:56: * Install shared

Bug#830893: RFS: kismon/0.8.1-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kismon" * Package name: kismon Version : 0.8.1-1 Upstream Author : Patrick Salecker * URL : https://www.salecker.org/software/kismon.html

Bug#830908: RFS: libu2f-server/1.0.1-1.3 [NMU]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libu2f-server" * Package name: libu2f-server Version : 1.0.1-1.3 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web

Bug#830907: RFS: pam-u2f/1.0.4-0.1 [NMU]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pam-u2f" * Package name: pam-u2f Version : 1.0.4-0.1 Upstream Author : Yubico AG * URL : https://developers.yubico.com/pam-u2f/ * License : BSD

Bug#830569: RFS: z3/4.4.1-0.1 [NMU] [4xRC]

Hi (please cc the bug) >I removed it, but does it do any harm? no, I guess not >Might have something to do with -fPIE vs. -fPIC, but one would have to >investigate further to be sure. This is definitely not a regression, >though, since the z3 version currently in the archive has no hardening

Bug#830845: RFS: fatx/1.11-1 [ITP] -- Complete XBOX filesystem support

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/fatx Regards, Christophe Duverger - Mail original - De: "Christophe Duverger" À: "Debian Bug Tracking System" Envoyé: Mardi

Re: Bug#830569: RFS: z3/4.4.1-0.1 [NMU] [4xRC]

It looks like my last email was not forwarded to the debian-mentors mailing list. Since I am still looking for a sponsor, here it is: Hi Jakub, thanks for the review! On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 08:33:21PM +0200, Jakub

Bug#830870: marked as done (RFS: python-qtawesome/0.3.3-3 [RC])

Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:56:56 + (UTC) with message-id <1089617967.2696349.1468328216336.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#830870: RFS: python-qtawesome/0.3.3-3 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #830870, regarding RFS: python-qtawesome/0.3.3-3 [RC] to be

Bug#830845: RFS: fatx/1.11-1 [ITP] -- Complete XBOX filesystem support

"dput -f" Il Martedì 12 Luglio 2016 14:51, "christophe.duver...@free.fr" ha scritto: Thank's. I've uploaded my public key on mentors.debian.net dput refuses to re-upload my package (says that it's already done), so how can I tell the system to reload my package ?

Bug#830845: RFS: fatx/1.11-1 [ITP] -- Complete XBOX filesystem support

Thank's. I've uploaded my public key on mentors.debian.net dput refuses to re-upload my package (says that it's already done), so how can I tell the system to reload my package ? Regards, CD - Mail original - De: "Gianfranco Costamagna" À: "christophe

Bug#830870: RFS: python-qtawesome/0.3.3-3 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-qtawesome" * Package name: python-qtawesome Version : 0.3.3-3 Upstream Author : The Spyder Development Team * URL :

Bug#830845: RFS: fatx/1.11-1 [ITP] -- Complete XBOX filesystem support

>AI have sent it to p80.pool.sks-keyservers.net and keys.gnupg.net according to >"https://wiki.debian.org/Keysigning#Step_7:_Send_your_signed_key_to_the_server; nope, you have to add it to your account IIRC mentors.debian.org, login and add it. G.

Re: Bug#797280: Please help porting cufflinks to latest libboost

Hi Jakub, On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 01:10:44PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > For some reason Eigen thinks that v.colwise().sum() cannot be treated as a > one-dimensional vector, which smells like a bug in Eigen. Changing the last > line to > > m = v.colwise().sum()(0, 0); > > seems to do

Bug#824967: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.2.5-1 [ITP]

Hi >Ok - TL;DR; from stuff I was discussing with Paul Wise. Budgie-Desktop is >definitely not Debian deb-helper friendly. With a standard v9 debhelper - >even with a >override_autoreconf, override_autoreconfigure etc, it appears >from first glance that the compilation works. However on

Bug#829151: RFS: setcolortemperature/1.1-1 ITP

Hi, > >Aren't there different rationales for source and binary package names? >This is what I have been thinking: > >- source package name should be upstream's name, because it's the > *source* >- binary package name is whatever makes most sense for someone typing > apt-get Indeed, I didn't

Re: Please help porting cufflinks to latest libboost

* Andreas Tille , 2016-07-12, 11:12: In file included from /usr/include/eigen3/Eigen/Core:297:0, from /usr/include/eigen3/Eigen/Dense:1, from abundances.h:21, from abundances.cpp:16:

Bug#830827: marked as done (RFS: wvstreams/4.6.1-9 [QA, RC])

Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:35:47 + (UTC) with message-id <505318512.2547142.1468319747396.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#830827: RFS: wvstreams/4.6.1-9 [QA, RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #830827, regarding RFS: wvstreams/4.6.1-9 [QA, RC] to be marked

Bug#829208: marked as done (RFS: evil-paredit-el/0.0.2-1 ITP)

Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:29:33 + (UTC) with message-id <1681591465.2516746.1468319373770.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#829208: RFS: evil-paredit-el/0.0.2-1 ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #829208, regarding RFS: evil-paredit-el/0.0.2-1 ITP to be

Bug#829208: RFS: evil-paredit-el/0.0.2-1 ITP

> >In my view evil-paredit-el is ready to be uploaded, bar `dch -r`. Sorry, was out-of-networking. Done 'debchange -r' and pushed as 8d9c4d3. -- Accept: text/plain, text/x-diff Accept-Language: eo,en,ru X-Web-Site: sinsekvu.github.io

Please help porting cufflinks to latest libboost

Hi, in my last commit I tried to build cufflinks[1] against libboost 1.60 but failed. Since the failure does not seem to related to libboost I wonder whether somebody might be able to understand and fix this issue: ... In file included from /usr/include/eigen3/Eigen/Core:297:0,

Bug#830845: RFS: fatx/1.11-1 [ITP] -- Complete XBOX filesystem support

Hi, >I've uploaded it with dput on mentors.debian.net. and it got rejected it seems

Bug#830845: RFS: fatx/1.11-1 [ITP] -- Complete XBOX filesystem support

Hi, I've uploaded it with dput on mentors.debian.net. Regards, CD - Mail original - De: "Gianfranco Costamagna" À: "Christophe Duverger" , 830...@bugs.debian.org Envoyé: Mardi 12 Juillet 2016 10:15:15 Objet: Re: Bug#830845: RFS: fatx/1.11-1

Bug#830845: RFS: fatx/1.11-1 [ITP] -- Complete XBOX filesystem support

control: tags -1 moreinfo >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fatx": >http://sourceforge.net/projects/fatx there is no source of a debian directory to look at. we need the source, not the binary, and please upload it on mentors.debian.net (where you can find a lot of documentation and

Bug#830845: RFS: fatx/1.11-1 [ITP] -- Complete XBOX filesystem support

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fatx": Package name: fatx Version : 1.11-1 Upstream Author : Christophe Duverger URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/fatx License